windshied survey

Order Description
make the subtopics in order and strictly follow the guidelines
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA FOR CARE OF POPULATIONS ASSIGNMENT Category Points Description
Community Assessment (including team’s windshield surveys)
25 Provide a description of the community based on the team’s windshield survey, offering critical information about the community and a thorough description of the target population. Use data from databases, interviews, and the textbook to support the assessment.
Nursing Diagnoses 10 Assignment should include three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis.
Priority Health Issue 10 Issue is justified by the data findings and analysis. Issue is in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components.

NR442 Community Health
NR442 Care of Population.docx New 02/01/15 LLS/ DRL 6
Category Points Description
Community Health Intervention 30 The health promotion goals are in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components. Proposed interventions are appropriate to the health issue identified and are substantiated by findings in the literature as best practice. The evaluation plan includes structure, process, and outcome criteria. Identification of Community Resources 15 A minimum of two community partners or agencies that can serve as resources for carrying out the proposed intervention are identified. Identify websites or other electronic sources that provide support for the proposed intervention. Identify the specific resources found at the community partner or clinical agency that can be utilized to carry out the proposed intervention.
Presentation Style 10 Presentation is professional, using presentation software. References have proper use of APA sixth edition formatting. Presentation has proper use of APA format, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Total 100 A quality presentation will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 7
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance A (92–100%)
Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%)
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance F (0–75%)
Community Assessment (25 points)
Description of the community assessment is clear and complete; it presents a thorough community profile. (23–25 points)
Description of the community assessment is incomplete; it addresses most of the components of a community assessment adequately. (21–22 points)
Description of the community assessment situation is vague; multiple components of the community assessment are missing. (19–20 points)
Description of the community assessment is missing most of the components of the assessment. (0–18 points)
Nursing Diagnoses (10 points)
Three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis are identified. (10 points)
One of the four required diagnoses is missing. (9 points)
Two of the four required diagnoses are missing. (8 points)
Three or all four of the required diagnoses are missing. (0–7 points)
Priority Health Issue for Target Population (10 points)
Thorough description of the target population; provides two or more items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; all five elements of a SMART goal are present. (10 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one to two items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; three to four elements of a SMART goal are present. (9 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one item of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; zero to two of the SMART goal elements are present. (8 points)
Minimal or missing description of the target population; health issue not a priority for the target population; zero to one of the SMART goal elements are present. (0–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points Total Points Earned =
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 8
Community Health Intervention (30 points)
Intervention strategy reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan contains structure, process, and outcome measures. ( 28–30 points)
Intervention strategy partially reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan is missing one or more: structure, process, and outcome measures. (26–27 points)
Intervention strategy poorly reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is missing; description of the situation is mostly vague or missing. The evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (23–25 points)
Major elements of the intervention strategy are missing; level of prevention is missing; the evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (0–22 points)
Identification of Community Resources (15 points)
Identifies three or four relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies comprehensive resources that can be used by the community or population; addresses available resources not used; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (14–15 points)
Identifies two or three relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies two or three resources that can be used by the community or population; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (13 points)
Identifies one or two relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies one or two resources that can be used by the community or population; provides minimal evidence-based support for ideas. (12 points)
Missing relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; does not identify resources that can be used by the community or population; does not provide evidencebased support for ideas. (0–11 points)
Presentation Style (10 points)
Flow of presentation is logical and easy to follow; Ideas are presented clearly; no more than three errors in APA formatting in reference list and in-text citations; two or more evidence-based sources used; proper use of
Flow of presentation is logical and; ideas are presented clearly; no more than three to five errors in APA formatting; in reference list and in-text citations; two evidence-based sources cited; proper use of APA,
Presentation is difficult to follow; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; elements of reference list and in-text citations missing; fewer than two evidence-based sources cited; 5–10 spelling and
Presentation is difficult to follow; ideas vague or not clearly presented; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; reference list and/or in text citations missing; 10 or more spelling and grammar
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 9
APA, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. No more than three spelling and grammar errors combined. All team members consistently maintain professionalism. (10 points)
grammar, mechanics, and spelling; three to five spelling and grammar errors. All team members maintain professionalism.
(9 points)
grammar errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. ( 8 points)
errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. (1–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points

windshied survey

Order Description
make the subtopics in order and strictly follow the guidelines
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA FOR CARE OF POPULATIONS ASSIGNMENT Category Points Description
Community Assessment (including team’s windshield surveys)
25 Provide a description of the community based on the team’s windshield survey, offering critical information about the community and a thorough description of the target population. Use data from databases, interviews, and the textbook to support the assessment.
Nursing Diagnoses 10 Assignment should include three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis.
Priority Health Issue 10 Issue is justified by the data findings and analysis. Issue is in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components.

NR442 Community Health
NR442 Care of Population.docx New 02/01/15 LLS/ DRL 6
Category Points Description
Community Health Intervention 30 The health promotion goals are in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components. Proposed interventions are appropriate to the health issue identified and are substantiated by findings in the literature as best practice. The evaluation plan includes structure, process, and outcome criteria. Identification of Community Resources 15 A minimum of two community partners or agencies that can serve as resources for carrying out the proposed intervention are identified. Identify websites or other electronic sources that provide support for the proposed intervention. Identify the specific resources found at the community partner or clinical agency that can be utilized to carry out the proposed intervention.
Presentation Style 10 Presentation is professional, using presentation software. References have proper use of APA sixth edition formatting. Presentation has proper use of APA format, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Total 100 A quality presentation will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 7
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance A (92–100%)
Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%)
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance F (0–75%)
Community Assessment (25 points)
Description of the community assessment is clear and complete; it presents a thorough community profile. (23–25 points)
Description of the community assessment is incomplete; it addresses most of the components of a community assessment adequately. (21–22 points)
Description of the community assessment situation is vague; multiple components of the community assessment are missing. (19–20 points)
Description of the community assessment is missing most of the components of the assessment. (0–18 points)
Nursing Diagnoses (10 points)
Three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis are identified. (10 points)
One of the four required diagnoses is missing. (9 points)
Two of the four required diagnoses are missing. (8 points)
Three or all four of the required diagnoses are missing. (0–7 points)
Priority Health Issue for Target Population (10 points)
Thorough description of the target population; provides two or more items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; all five elements of a SMART goal are present. (10 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one to two items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; three to four elements of a SMART goal are present. (9 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one item of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; zero to two of the SMART goal elements are present. (8 points)
Minimal or missing description of the target population; health issue not a priority for the target population; zero to one of the SMART goal elements are present. (0–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points Total Points Earned =
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 8
Community Health Intervention (30 points)
Intervention strategy reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan contains structure, process, and outcome measures. ( 28–30 points)
Intervention strategy partially reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan is missing one or more: structure, process, and outcome measures. (26–27 points)
Intervention strategy poorly reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is missing; description of the situation is mostly vague or missing. The evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (23–25 points)
Major elements of the intervention strategy are missing; level of prevention is missing; the evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (0–22 points)
Identification of Community Resources (15 points)
Identifies three or four relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies comprehensive resources that can be used by the community or population; addresses available resources not used; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (14–15 points)
Identifies two or three relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies two or three resources that can be used by the community or population; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (13 points)
Identifies one or two relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies one or two resources that can be used by the community or population; provides minimal evidence-based support for ideas. (12 points)
Missing relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; does not identify resources that can be used by the community or population; does not provide evidencebased support for ideas. (0–11 points)
Presentation Style (10 points)
Flow of presentation is logical and easy to follow; Ideas are presented clearly; no more than three errors in APA formatting in reference list and in-text citations; two or more evidence-based sources used; proper use of
Flow of presentation is logical and; ideas are presented clearly; no more than three to five errors in APA formatting; in reference list and in-text citations; two evidence-based sources cited; proper use of APA,
Presentation is difficult to follow; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; elements of reference list and in-text citations missing; fewer than two evidence-based sources cited; 5–10 spelling and
Presentation is difficult to follow; ideas vague or not clearly presented; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; reference list and/or in text citations missing; 10 or more spelling and grammar
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 9
APA, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. No more than three spelling and grammar errors combined. All team members consistently maintain professionalism. (10 points)
grammar, mechanics, and spelling; three to five spelling and grammar errors. All team members maintain professionalism.
(9 points)
grammar errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. ( 8 points)
errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. (1–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points

windshied survey

Order Description
make the subtopics in order and strictly follow the guidelines
DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA FOR CARE OF POPULATIONS ASSIGNMENT Category Points Description
Community Assessment (including team’s windshield surveys)
25 Provide a description of the community based on the team’s windshield survey, offering critical information about the community and a thorough description of the target population. Use data from databases, interviews, and the textbook to support the assessment.
Nursing Diagnoses 10 Assignment should include three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis.
Priority Health Issue 10 Issue is justified by the data findings and analysis. Issue is in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components.

NR442 Community Health
NR442 Care of Population.docx New 02/01/15 LLS/ DRL 6
Category Points Description
Community Health Intervention 30 The health promotion goals are in SMART format to include specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound components. Proposed interventions are appropriate to the health issue identified and are substantiated by findings in the literature as best practice. The evaluation plan includes structure, process, and outcome criteria. Identification of Community Resources 15 A minimum of two community partners or agencies that can serve as resources for carrying out the proposed intervention are identified. Identify websites or other electronic sources that provide support for the proposed intervention. Identify the specific resources found at the community partner or clinical agency that can be utilized to carry out the proposed intervention.
Presentation Style 10 Presentation is professional, using presentation software. References have proper use of APA sixth edition formatting. Presentation has proper use of APA format, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Total 100 A quality presentation will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 7
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance A (92–100%)
Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%)
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance F (0–75%)
Community Assessment (25 points)
Description of the community assessment is clear and complete; it presents a thorough community profile. (23–25 points)
Description of the community assessment is incomplete; it addresses most of the components of a community assessment adequately. (21–22 points)
Description of the community assessment situation is vague; multiple components of the community assessment are missing. (19–20 points)
Description of the community assessment is missing most of the components of the assessment. (0–18 points)
Nursing Diagnoses (10 points)
Three community health diagnoses and one wellness diagnosis are identified. (10 points)
One of the four required diagnoses is missing. (9 points)
Two of the four required diagnoses are missing. (8 points)
Three or all four of the required diagnoses are missing. (0–7 points)
Priority Health Issue for Target Population (10 points)
Thorough description of the target population; provides two or more items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; all five elements of a SMART goal are present. (10 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one to two items of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; three to four elements of a SMART goal are present. (9 points)
Partial description of the target population; provides one item of data in support of the priority health issue for the target population; zero to two of the SMART goal elements are present. (8 points)
Minimal or missing description of the target population; health issue not a priority for the target population; zero to one of the SMART goal elements are present. (0–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points Total Points Earned =
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 8
Community Health Intervention (30 points)
Intervention strategy reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan contains structure, process, and outcome measures. ( 28–30 points)
Intervention strategy partially reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is identified; feasibility is addressed. The evaluation plan is missing one or more: structure, process, and outcome measures. (26–27 points)
Intervention strategy poorly reflects evidence and best practice; level of prevention is missing; description of the situation is mostly vague or missing. The evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (23–25 points)
Major elements of the intervention strategy are missing; level of prevention is missing; the evaluation plan is lacking structure, process, and/or outcome measures. (0–22 points)
Identification of Community Resources (15 points)
Identifies three or four relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies comprehensive resources that can be used by the community or population; addresses available resources not used; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (14–15 points)
Identifies two or three relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies two or three resources that can be used by the community or population; supports ideas with sound, evidence-based rationale. (13 points)
Identifies one or two relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; identifies one or two resources that can be used by the community or population; provides minimal evidence-based support for ideas. (12 points)
Missing relevant resources available to develop the intervention strategy; does not identify resources that can be used by the community or population; does not provide evidencebased support for ideas. (0–11 points)
Presentation Style (10 points)
Flow of presentation is logical and easy to follow; Ideas are presented clearly; no more than three errors in APA formatting in reference list and in-text citations; two or more evidence-based sources used; proper use of
Flow of presentation is logical and; ideas are presented clearly; no more than three to five errors in APA formatting; in reference list and in-text citations; two evidence-based sources cited; proper use of APA,
Presentation is difficult to follow; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; elements of reference list and in-text citations missing; fewer than two evidence-based sources cited; 5–10 spelling and
Presentation is difficult to follow; ideas vague or not clearly presented; APA formatting inconsistent with more than five errors; reference list and/or in text citations missing; 10 or more spelling and grammar
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR442 Community Health Nursing
NR442 Care of Populations Guidelines.docx New12/11/12 LLS/DRL 9
APA, grammar, mechanics, and spelling. No more than three spelling and grammar errors combined. All team members consistently maintain professionalism. (10 points)
grammar, mechanics, and spelling; three to five spelling and grammar errors. All team members maintain professionalism.
(9 points)
grammar errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. ( 8 points)
errors. Professionalism is not maintained by all team members at all times. (1–7 points)
Total Points Possible = 100 points