icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Whitehouse Street (in Bristol)Masterplan, The Section of Design and heritage. This is a group work, I need writer two part, design and heritage. Please according the following result for our group result to do this job.

MSC Urban planning
Was gibt s alles für Dokumente?

Neighbourhood plan?
Transport plan
– Local

– City council
– Joint plan
Joint Local Transport Plan 3 (JLTP3) Strategy
“In a nutshell we want an affordable, low carbon, accessible, integrated, efficient and reliable transport network to achieve a more competitive economy and better connected, more active and healthy communities” (West of England Partnership, 2011, p. 5).
Key transport goals of:
• Reduce carbon emissions
• Support economic growth
• Promote accessibility
• Contribute to better safety, security and health
• Improve quality of life and a healthy natural environment (p.6)
A transport system that recognises the whole journey. Where cycle routes and footways feed in to the public transport network; A transport system where both bus and rail play their part. Where buses serve the movements around and within towns, cities and rural communities. Where rail serves both short and longer journeys; Where marketing, through ticketing, timetable coordination and interchanges make public transport more desirable than the private car; Where customer satisfaction is the driver behind encouraging public transport use; Whilst recognising the car will still provide personal mobility for many
(p.9)

Greater Bedminster Community Partnership
(Bristol City Council, 2015, p. www)
(City of Bristol, 2015, p. www) (Pucher & Buehler, 2008)

Know Your Place map
Health in Bristol

(Bristol City Council, 2015, p. www)
Literaturverzeichnis
Bristol City Council, 2015. Greater bedminster community partnership. [Online]
Available at: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/people-communities/greater-bedminster-community-partnership
[Zugriff am 25 11 2015].
Bristol City Council, 2015. Indices of Deprivation 2015. [Online]
Available at: http://ias.bristol.gov.uk/IAS/dataviews/report?reportId=1346&viewId=1066&geoReportId=5295&geoId=408&geoSubsetId=
[Zugriff am 11 25 2015].
City of Bristol, 2015. Traffic Choices_Cycling Improvements. [Online]
Available at: https://www.trafficchoices.co.uk/cycling.shtml
[Zugriff am 25 11 2015].
Pucher, J. & Buehler, R., 2008. Making Cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), pp. 495-528.
West of England Partnership, 2011. Joint Local Transport Plan 3 – 2011-2026, s.l.: West of England Partnership: Bath&North East Somerset Council_Bristol City Council_North Somerset Council_South Gloucestershire Council.
Strength
– Close to city center
– Good rail link to the wider region
– Surrounded by “richer” neighbourhoods
– Schools, retail, work, doctors in walking distance
– Long history
– Bus links
– Light industrial use providing work (for skilled and low skilled workers)
– Windmill Hill city farm providing food, education, green space, community involvement
– Walkways through the building line (?!)
– Victoria park
Weaknesses
– One of the most deprived neighbourhoods
– Industrial site
– Unattractive cycle links
– Big roundabout is unattractive for pedestrians when walking to the city center
– Closed by major roads/rail from other neighborhoods
– Mostly cheap retail
– Unattractive design
– “in between” different neighbourhoods
– Close to the “noisy” rail
– Besides the farm not much/attractive green space
– Unattractive rail crossing
– Flood plain (3/4) zone 2 and 3
– Uneven use between high street and the park/residential/industrial areas
Opportunities
– Open up to the surroundings
– New development could stimulate people to climb up the social ladder
– Nice old buildings
– Interested developers
– “walk through” for people (to the station, to the city center, etc.)
– New BRT stop nearby
– “stepping stone” between the different communities – provide attractive links for pedestrians/cyclists; Improve access to Victoria park and city farm
– Sustainable high density development close to public transport links
Threats
– Floods
– Gentrification (deprived people losing out on the new development)
– Losing the “character” of the area
– Becoming a pure residential area
– High rise residential – views

Goals/Objectives
Sustainability

Environment green infrastructure (adaption to climate change), access to public transport, more cycling/walking (preventing climate change)
economic keep industrial use, provide space for shops, Local Enterprise Center, etc.
social new school, meeting space (community center, green space, sport, city farm), improve health through outdoor activities
local heritage (conservation area, listed buildings)
employment
Integrated – Connected – Liveable – Character
– Provide attractive/safe links for pedestrians
– Stop through traffic
– Strengthen community life – vitality
– Enhance mixed-use and dense development
– Provide opportunities for sport/community life
– Provide a backbone for future-development
– Keep industrial use

“PROMENADE”
Cycling
Walking
Green infrastructure
Community buildings
Sports grounds?!
Shops
Café
Better crossing of rail (TWICE)

NDPS
‘light touch’
Address/include:
– Directly or indirectly spatial issues
– Strong evidence base
– Clear objectives
– Precise policies
– Link to community engagement
Must be ‘in general conformity’ with local plan
Can allocate sites
Must include no less than any allocated development, can be more than
May require and environmental assessment and/or sustainability appraisal
NDPs not subject to the ‘duty to cooperate’
Für Masterarbeit: schau nochmal die presentation über neigbourhood plans auf blackboard an – 26.11.2015

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Whitehouse Street (in Bristol)Masterplan, The Section of Design and heritage. This is a group work, I need writer two part, design and heritage. Please according the following result for our group result to do this job.

MSC Urban planning
Was gibt s alles für Dokumente?

Neighbourhood plan?
Transport plan
– Local

– City council
– Joint plan
Joint Local Transport Plan 3 (JLTP3) Strategy
“In a nutshell we want an affordable, low carbon, accessible, integrated, efficient and reliable transport network to achieve a more competitive economy and better connected, more active and healthy communities” (West of England Partnership, 2011, p. 5).
Key transport goals of:
• Reduce carbon emissions
• Support economic growth
• Promote accessibility
• Contribute to better safety, security and health
• Improve quality of life and a healthy natural environment (p.6)
A transport system that recognises the whole journey. Where cycle routes and footways feed in to the public transport network; A transport system where both bus and rail play their part. Where buses serve the movements around and within towns, cities and rural communities. Where rail serves both short and longer journeys; Where marketing, through ticketing, timetable coordination and interchanges make public transport more desirable than the private car; Where customer satisfaction is the driver behind encouraging public transport use; Whilst recognising the car will still provide personal mobility for many
(p.9)

Greater Bedminster Community Partnership
(Bristol City Council, 2015, p. www)
(City of Bristol, 2015, p. www) (Pucher & Buehler, 2008)

Know Your Place map
Health in Bristol

(Bristol City Council, 2015, p. www)
Literaturverzeichnis
Bristol City Council, 2015. Greater bedminster community partnership. [Online]
Available at: https://www.bristol.gov.uk/people-communities/greater-bedminster-community-partnership
[Zugriff am 25 11 2015].
Bristol City Council, 2015. Indices of Deprivation 2015. [Online]
Available at: http://ias.bristol.gov.uk/IAS/dataviews/report?reportId=1346&viewId=1066&geoReportId=5295&geoId=408&geoSubsetId=
[Zugriff am 11 25 2015].
City of Bristol, 2015. Traffic Choices_Cycling Improvements. [Online]
Available at: https://www.trafficchoices.co.uk/cycling.shtml
[Zugriff am 25 11 2015].
Pucher, J. & Buehler, R., 2008. Making Cycling irresistible: lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), pp. 495-528.
West of England Partnership, 2011. Joint Local Transport Plan 3 – 2011-2026, s.l.: West of England Partnership: Bath&North East Somerset Council_Bristol City Council_North Somerset Council_South Gloucestershire Council.
Strength
– Close to city center
– Good rail link to the wider region
– Surrounded by “richer” neighbourhoods
– Schools, retail, work, doctors in walking distance
– Long history
– Bus links
– Light industrial use providing work (for skilled and low skilled workers)
– Windmill Hill city farm providing food, education, green space, community involvement
– Walkways through the building line (?!)
– Victoria park
Weaknesses
– One of the most deprived neighbourhoods
– Industrial site
– Unattractive cycle links
– Big roundabout is unattractive for pedestrians when walking to the city center
– Closed by major roads/rail from other neighborhoods
– Mostly cheap retail
– Unattractive design
– “in between” different neighbourhoods
– Close to the “noisy” rail
– Besides the farm not much/attractive green space
– Unattractive rail crossing
– Flood plain (3/4) zone 2 and 3
– Uneven use between high street and the park/residential/industrial areas
Opportunities
– Open up to the surroundings
– New development could stimulate people to climb up the social ladder
– Nice old buildings
– Interested developers
– “walk through” for people (to the station, to the city center, etc.)
– New BRT stop nearby
– “stepping stone” between the different communities – provide attractive links for pedestrians/cyclists; Improve access to Victoria park and city farm
– Sustainable high density development close to public transport links
Threats
– Floods
– Gentrification (deprived people losing out on the new development)
– Losing the “character” of the area
– Becoming a pure residential area
– High rise residential – views

Goals/Objectives
Sustainability

Environment green infrastructure (adaption to climate change), access to public transport, more cycling/walking (preventing climate change)
economic keep industrial use, provide space for shops, Local Enterprise Center, etc.
social new school, meeting space (community center, green space, sport, city farm), improve health through outdoor activities
local heritage (conservation area, listed buildings)
employment
Integrated – Connected – Liveable – Character
– Provide attractive/safe links for pedestrians
– Stop through traffic
– Strengthen community life – vitality
– Enhance mixed-use and dense development
– Provide opportunities for sport/community life
– Provide a backbone for future-development
– Keep industrial use

“PROMENADE”
Cycling
Walking
Green infrastructure
Community buildings
Sports grounds?!
Shops
Café
Better crossing of rail (TWICE)

NDPS
‘light touch’
Address/include:
– Directly or indirectly spatial issues
– Strong evidence base
– Clear objectives
– Precise policies
– Link to community engagement
Must be ‘in general conformity’ with local plan
Can allocate sites
Must include no less than any allocated development, can be more than
May require and environmental assessment and/or sustainability appraisal
NDPs not subject to the ‘duty to cooperate’
Für Masterarbeit: schau nochmal die presentation über neigbourhood plans auf blackboard an – 26.11.2015

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes