Translational Research For Practice & Population

Order Description
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH FOR PRACTICE & POPULATIONS

Competency 7000.1.1: Evaluating Comprehensive Literature Reviews – The graduate evaluates comprehensive literature reviews for historical context, completeness, applicability, reliability, organization, and quality of information sources.
Competency 7000.1.7: Translation of Research in Evidence-Based Practice – The graduate interprets evidence and evaluates its applicability to nursing practice.

Introduction:
One of the key roles of the master’s-prepared nurse is to lead practice change across the full spectrum of healthcare settings. Master’s-prepared nurses must be able to translate the existing body of knowledge around a phenomenon of interest (accessible through published research studies) to inform decision making related to nursing practice.

Requirements:

A. Identify a current nursing practice within your healthcare setting that requires change.
Note: This may be your current work setting or a setting you wish to work in.
1. Describe the current nursing practice.

2. Discuss why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Identify the key stakeholders within your healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

1. Describe the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
C. Evaluate five sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

1. Create an evidence critique table (see “Sample Evidence Critique Table”) by identifying the evidence strength and evidence hierarchy of each chosen source.
D. Develop an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of five sources used (suggested length of 1–2 pages for all sources).
E. Recommend a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

1. Justify why you chose the practice change model.

2. Explain how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
G. Discuss possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
H. Discuss any possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assesment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.
File Attachments:
1. Sample Evidence Critique Table link opens in new window

Click to Show/Hide Method
Evaluation Method
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
The candidate provides limited articulation of response.
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

A. Nursing Practice Identification

The candidate does not identify a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.

A1. Nursing Practice Description

The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the current nursing practice.

A2. Why Nursing Practice Needs to Change
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Key Stakeholders
The candidate does not identify the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

B1. Stakeholders’ Roles
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.

C. Evidence Critique Table

The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation of 1–4 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with limited detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with adequate detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A,
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with substantial detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

D. Evidence Summary

The candidate does not provide an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with no detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with limited detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with adequate detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with substantial detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.

E. Recommend Best Practice

The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation for a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with no detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with limited detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with adequate detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with substantial detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Practice Change Model

The candidate does not identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

F1. Model Justification

The candidate does not provide a logical justification of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with no support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with substantial support, of why the practice change model was chosen.

F2. Model to Guide Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.

G. Barriers to Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.

H. Ethical Implications

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.

Order Description
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH FOR PRACTICE & POPULATIONS

Competency 7000.1.1: Evaluating Comprehensive Literature Reviews – The graduate evaluates comprehensive literature reviews for historical context, completeness, applicability, reliability, organization, and quality of information sources.
Competency 7000.1.7: Translation of Research in Evidence-Based Practice – The graduate interprets evidence and evaluates its applicability to nursing practice.

Introduction:
One of the key roles of the master’s-prepared nurse is to lead practice change across the full spectrum of healthcare settings. Master’s-prepared nurses must be able to translate the existing body of knowledge around a phenomenon of interest (accessible through published research studies) to inform decision making related to nursing practice.

Requirements:

A. Identify a current nursing practice within your healthcare setting that requires change.
Note: This may be your current work setting or a setting you wish to work in.
1. Describe the current nursing practice.

2. Discuss why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Identify the key stakeholders within your healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

1. Describe the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
C. Evaluate five sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

1. Create an evidence critique table (see “Sample Evidence Critique Table”) by identifying the evidence strength and evidence hierarchy of each chosen source.
D. Develop an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of five sources used (suggested length of 1–2 pages for all sources).
E. Recommend a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

1. Justify why you chose the practice change model.

2. Explain how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
G. Discuss possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
H. Discuss any possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assesment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.
File Attachments:
1. Sample Evidence Critique Table link opens in new window

Click to Show/Hide Method
Evaluation Method
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
The candidate provides limited articulation of response.
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

A. Nursing Practice Identification

The candidate does not identify a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.

A1. Nursing Practice Description

The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the current nursing practice.

A2. Why Nursing Practice Needs to Change
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Key Stakeholders
The candidate does not identify the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

B1. Stakeholders’ Roles
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.

C. Evidence Critique Table

The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation of 1–4 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with limited detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with adequate detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A,
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with substantial detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

D. Evidence Summary

The candidate does not provide an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with no detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with limited detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with adequate detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with substantial detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.

E. Recommend Best Practice

The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation for a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with no detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with limited detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with adequate detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with substantial detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Practice Change Model

The candidate does not identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

F1. Model Justification

The candidate does not provide a logical justification of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with no support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with substantial support, of why the practice change model was chosen.

F2. Model to Guide Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.

G. Barriers to Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.

H. Ethical Implications

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.

Order Description
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH FOR PRACTICE & POPULATIONS

Competency 7000.1.1: Evaluating Comprehensive Literature Reviews – The graduate evaluates comprehensive literature reviews for historical context, completeness, applicability, reliability, organization, and quality of information sources.
Competency 7000.1.7: Translation of Research in Evidence-Based Practice – The graduate interprets evidence and evaluates its applicability to nursing practice.

Introduction:
One of the key roles of the master’s-prepared nurse is to lead practice change across the full spectrum of healthcare settings. Master’s-prepared nurses must be able to translate the existing body of knowledge around a phenomenon of interest (accessible through published research studies) to inform decision making related to nursing practice.

Requirements:

A. Identify a current nursing practice within your healthcare setting that requires change.
Note: This may be your current work setting or a setting you wish to work in.
1. Describe the current nursing practice.

2. Discuss why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Identify the key stakeholders within your healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

1. Describe the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
C. Evaluate five sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

1. Create an evidence critique table (see “Sample Evidence Critique Table”) by identifying the evidence strength and evidence hierarchy of each chosen source.
D. Develop an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of five sources used (suggested length of 1–2 pages for all sources).
E. Recommend a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

1. Justify why you chose the practice change model.

2. Explain how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
G. Discuss possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
H. Discuss any possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assesment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.
File Attachments:
1. Sample Evidence Critique Table link opens in new window

Click to Show/Hide Method
Evaluation Method
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)

The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.
The candidate provides weak articulation of response.
The candidate provides limited articulation of response.
The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.

A. Nursing Practice Identification

The candidate does not identify a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a current nursing practice within the candidate’s healthcare setting that requires change.

A1. Nursing Practice Description

The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the current nursing practice.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the current nursing practice.

A2. Why Nursing Practice Needs to Change
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of why the current nursing practice needs to be changed.

B. Key Stakeholders
The candidate does not identify the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies the key stakeholders within the healthcare setting who are part of the current nursing practice.

B1. Stakeholders’ Roles
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with no detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with limited detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with adequate detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides an appropriate description, with substantial detail, of the role each identified key stakeholder will play to support the proposed practice change.

C. Evidence Critique Table

The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation of 1–4 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with limited detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with adequate detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A,
The candidate provide a logical evaluation, with substantial detail, of 5 sources from scholarly peer-reviewed journals, published within the past five years, that relate to the change identified in part A.

D. Evidence Summary

The candidate does not provide an evidence summary based on the findings from part C that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with no detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with limited detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with adequate detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.
The candidate provides an evidence summary based on the findings from part C, with substantial detail, that includes each of the 5 sources used.

E. Recommend Best Practice

The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation for a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with no detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with limited detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with adequate detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.
The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with substantial detail, of a specific best practice based on the evidence summary developed in part D.

F. Practice Change Model

The candidate does not identify a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The candidate identifies a practice change model that is appropriate to apply to the proposed practice change.

F1. Model Justification

The candidate does not provide a logical justification of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with no support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of why the practice change model was chosen.
The candidate provides a logical justification, with substantial support, of why the practice change model was chosen.

F2. Model to Guide Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of how to apply the identified model to guide the implementation of the proposed practice change.

G. Barriers to Implementation

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of possible barriers to successful implementation of the proposed practice change.

H. Ethical Implications

The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial support, of possible ethical implications that may arise while planning or implementing the proposed practice change.