Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Topic: Mandela’s position.

Order Description
Nelson Mandela argued that apartheid was unjust but also argued that reconciliation between whites and blacks in post-apartheid South Africa took priority over (a) punishing wrongdoers who acknowledged what they had done and (b) paying full compensation to the black victims of apartheid. He thus placed greater weight on national reconciliation than on corrective justice or retribution.

In evaluating the soundness of Mandela’s position, outline (a) the considerations that might favor rejection of compensation for victims of wrongdoing and punishment of wrongdoers and (b) the considerations that might make it appropriate to deemphasize corrective justice and retribution. Finally, defend your own conclusion about Mandela’s position.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Topic: Mandela’s position.

Order Description
Nelson Mandela argued that apartheid was unjust but also argued that reconciliation between whites and blacks in post-apartheid South Africa took priority over (a) punishing wrongdoers who acknowledged what they had done and (b) paying full compensation to the black victims of apartheid. He thus placed greater weight on national reconciliation than on corrective justice or retribution.

In evaluating the soundness of Mandela’s position, outline (a) the considerations that might favor rejection of compensation for victims of wrongdoing and punishment of wrongdoers and (b) the considerations that might make it appropriate to deemphasize corrective justice and retribution. Finally, defend your own conclusion about Mandela’s position.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes