Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

topic in the paper instructions

topic in the paper instructions
Balancing the confidentiality of individual health information with the need to protect public health, the HIPAA Privacy Rule expressly permits certain disclosures of
protected health information (PHI) to public health authorities without an individual’s knowledge or authorization. For example, a healthcare provider may disclose to
public health officials PHI about a person who is diagnosed with a communicable disease. How would you feel about a doctor disclosing this type of information about
you or a loved one? Discuss arguments on both sides of the issue referencing at least one outside source to support your position.

For additional details, please refer to the Journal Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.

Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Journals in this course are private and between you and the instructor only. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn
each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and
professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to
further develop these skills. Review this tutorial for information on creating a Blackboard journal entry.. Each journal entry will be graded individually.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Critical Thinking and Reflection Almost all entries support claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Most of
the entries support claims with a relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Some of the entries support claims with
a relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process None of the entries support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples
25
Integration and Application Almost all entries show excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibit careful consideration of the topic Most of the
entries show good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrate that the student has read the module content Some of the entries show limited depth of
knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further None of the entries address the prompts and reflect that the
student has not read the module content 25
Voice Almost all of the entries are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout
Most of the entries are written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice Some of the
entries are written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and difficult to identify None of the entries attempt to use a
style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice 25

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

topic in the paper instructions

topic in the paper instructions
Balancing the confidentiality of individual health information with the need to protect public health, the HIPAA Privacy Rule expressly permits certain disclosures of
protected health information (PHI) to public health authorities without an individual’s knowledge or authorization. For example, a healthcare provider may disclose to
public health officials PHI about a person who is diagnosed with a communicable disease. How would you feel about a doctor disclosing this type of information about
you or a loved one? Discuss arguments on both sides of the issue referencing at least one outside source to support your position.

For additional details, please refer to the Journal Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.

Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Journals in this course are private and between you and the instructor only. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn
each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and
professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to
further develop these skills. Review this tutorial for information on creating a Blackboard journal entry.. Each journal entry will be graded individually.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Critical Thinking and Reflection Almost all entries support claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Most of
the entries support claims with a relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Some of the entries support claims with
a relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process None of the entries support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples
25
Integration and Application Almost all entries show excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibit careful consideration of the topic Most of the
entries show good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrate that the student has read the module content Some of the entries show limited depth of
knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further None of the entries address the prompts and reflect that the
student has not read the module content 25
Voice Almost all of the entries are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout
Most of the entries are written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice Some of the
entries are written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and difficult to identify None of the entries attempt to use a
style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice 25

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

topic in the paper instructions

topic in the paper instructions
Balancing the confidentiality of individual health information with the need to protect public health, the HIPAA Privacy Rule expressly permits certain disclosures of
protected health information (PHI) to public health authorities without an individual’s knowledge or authorization. For example, a healthcare provider may disclose to
public health officials PHI about a person who is diagnosed with a communicable disease. How would you feel about a doctor disclosing this type of information about
you or a loved one? Discuss arguments on both sides of the issue referencing at least one outside source to support your position.

For additional details, please refer to the Journal Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.

Journal Guidelines and Rubric

Journals in this course are private and between you and the instructor only. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply what you learn
each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on your educational and
professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you the opportunity to
further develop these skills. Review this tutorial for information on creating a Blackboard journal entry.. Each journal entry will be graded individually.

Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Critical Thinking and Reflection Almost all entries support claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Most of
the entries support claims with a relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process Some of the entries support claims with
a relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process None of the entries support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples
25
Integration and Application Almost all entries show excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibit careful consideration of the topic Most of the
entries show good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrate that the student has read the module content Some of the entries show limited depth of
knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further None of the entries address the prompts and reflect that the
student has not read the module content 25
Voice Almost all of the entries are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience, and a consistent voice is evident throughout
Most of the entries are written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience, and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice Some of the
entries are written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and difficult to identify None of the entries attempt to use a
style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice 25

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes