Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Topic: Ethics Case Analysis

Order Description
Read the Ethics Case Scenario below and answer the questions associated with it. At least two (2) peer-reviewed sources other than the textbook must be used to support your opinion. List and cite your references. Your analysis should be at least 2 pages in length, in addition to a title and a reference page. APA formatting is required.
Scenario
Two principles are often at odds when healthcare practitioners must deal with health issues: The autonomy of each patient and beneficence. Autonomy refers to the individual’s right to make his or her own decisions. Beneficence refers to the moral obligating to act in ways that promote the health and welfare of others. As stated in Merman’s Ethical Challenges in the Management of Health Information, “Beneficence and the closely allied principle of nonmaleficence (first do no harm) are among the primary justification supporting public policies that interfere with the autonomy of individuals.”
Ethics Issue:
Andre Speaker, a personal injury attorney flew via public transportation from Atlanta, Georgia to Paris to get married. Speaker was thought to have an extremely contagious and untreatable form of multidrug resistant tuberculosis. Upon Speaker’s return to the United States, the Centers for Disease Control used provision of the Public Health Service Act to involuntarily hospitalize and isolate him. Speaker’s diagnosis was later corrected. He had a treatable form of tuberculosis. At least nine individual who were passengers on the flights Speaker took later filed civil suits against him for knowingly exposing them to the disease.
1. Thinking as health care practitioners, in your opinion should Mr. Speaker’s autonomy as a person have taken precedence over the CDC’s desire to enforce public health law? Explain you answer.
2. In your opinion, did the CDC act ethically in involuntarily quarantine Mr. Speaker? Explain you answer.
3. Support your answers with facts/sources of reference.

Assignment Pointers: Answer Q1 and Q2 from the viewp01oint of your professional code of ethics (as a future health care administrator). Do not forget to tell me why you have these views and support your statements with facts and sources (Q3).

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Topic: Ethics Case Analysis

Order Description
Read the Ethics Case Scenario below and answer the questions associated with it. At least two (2) peer-reviewed sources other than the textbook must be used to support your opinion. List and cite your references. Your analysis should be at least 2 pages in length, in addition to a title and a reference page. APA formatting is required.
Scenario
Two principles are often at odds when healthcare practitioners must deal with health issues: The autonomy of each patient and beneficence. Autonomy refers to the individual’s right to make his or her own decisions. Beneficence refers to the moral obligating to act in ways that promote the health and welfare of others. As stated in Merman’s Ethical Challenges in the Management of Health Information, “Beneficence and the closely allied principle of nonmaleficence (first do no harm) are among the primary justification supporting public policies that interfere with the autonomy of individuals.”
Ethics Issue:
Andre Speaker, a personal injury attorney flew via public transportation from Atlanta, Georgia to Paris to get married. Speaker was thought to have an extremely contagious and untreatable form of multidrug resistant tuberculosis. Upon Speaker’s return to the United States, the Centers for Disease Control used provision of the Public Health Service Act to involuntarily hospitalize and isolate him. Speaker’s diagnosis was later corrected. He had a treatable form of tuberculosis. At least nine individual who were passengers on the flights Speaker took later filed civil suits against him for knowingly exposing them to the disease.
1. Thinking as health care practitioners, in your opinion should Mr. Speaker’s autonomy as a person have taken precedence over the CDC’s desire to enforce public health law? Explain you answer.
2. In your opinion, did the CDC act ethically in involuntarily quarantine Mr. Speaker? Explain you answer.
3. Support your answers with facts/sources of reference.

Assignment Pointers: Answer Q1 and Q2 from the viewpoint of your professional code of ethics (as a future health care administrator). Do not forget to tell me why you have these views and support your statements with facts and sources (Q3).

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes