The research about the incentive policy of the wind power industry of China – a case study of CNR company
A4 and others based on model essay and study guide. from D to B

teacher’s feedback: D (C, C-, D-, E, E, C) Reserch questions and objectives are clearly stated but student does not justify why it is important to use a wind power industry case, and no contextualisation to this industry has been made. It is not clear which gaps in the literature the student is trying to address. Student was able to identify relevant literature but chapter 2 was very descriptive. It is not clear the relation between Caribbean section since research is undertaken in China and there is no attempt to find literature on relevant industries such as energy. Research methodology does not contain any justification of the chosen methods, for instance why only questionnaire in a case study? There is some confusion between qualitative and quantitative approaches particularly in the quotation of Myers (2008) p.32. There is no attempt at inferential analysis.Findings is presented in the wrong chapter and there is no analysis of the data and no attempt to link with the literature.The conclusions are very weak and the references are not in alphabetical order and contain several erros in style.

The research about the incentive policy of the wind power industry of China – a case study of CNR company
A4 and others based on model essay and study guide. from D to B

teacher’s feedback: D (C, C-, D-, E, E, C) Reserch questions and objectives are clearly stated but student does not justify why it is important to use a wind power industry case, and no contextualisation to this industry has been made. It is not clear which gaps in the literature the student is trying to address. Student was able to identify relevant literature but chapter 2 was very descriptive. It is not clear the relation between Caribbean section since research is undertaken in China and there is no attempt to find literature on relevant industries such as energy. Research methodology does not contain any justification of the chosen methods, for instance why only questionnaire in a case study? There is some confusion between qualitative and quantitative approaches particularly in the quotation of Myers (2008) p.32. There is no attempt at inferential analysis.Findings is presented in the wrong chapter and there is no analysis of the data and no attempt to link with the literature.The conclusions are very weak and the references are not in alphabetical order and contain several erros in style.