Siegfried Giedion text how does Giedion characterize Le Corbusiers design methodology? What are its roots? What are some parallels?Then you should read the Passanti text How does Passanti use the concept of the vernacular to offer a different reading of Le Corbusier? What is the vernacular aesthetic sensibility? How does it differ from Giedions discussion of Le Corbuiser? You should also examine the three short excerpts from 3 Le Corbusier texts, considering how they support or contradict Giedion and Passantis arguments.
2-Please be specific to the article and dont be general.
3-please use only my resources. Also the main thing that you need to look for is the main argument. what you think is important that the author think is important? This is not a summary paper.

Siegfried Giedion text – how does Giedion characterize Le Corbusier’s design methodology? What are its roots? What are some parallels?

Then you should read the Passanti text – How does Passanti use the concept of the vernacular to offer a different reading of Le Corbusier? What is the “vernacular” aesthetic sensibility? How does it differ from Giedion’s discussion of Le Corbuiser? You should also examine the three short excerpts from 3 Le Corbusier texts, considering how they support or contradict Giedion and Passanti’s arguments.
2-Please be specific to the article and don’t be general.
3-please use only my resources. Also the main thing that you need to look for is the main argument. what you think is important that the author think is important? This is not a summary paper.

Siegfried Giedion text – how does Giedion characterize Le Corbusier’s design methodology? What are its roots? What are some parallels?

Then you should read the Passanti text – How does Passanti use the concept of the vernacular to offer a different reading of Le Corbusier? What is the “vernacular” aesthetic sensibility? How does it differ from Giedion’s discussion of Le Corbuiser? You should also examine the three short excerpts from 3 Le Corbusier texts, considering how they support or contradict Giedion and Passanti’s arguments.
2-Please be specific to the article and don’t be general.
3-please use only my resources. Also the main thing that you need to look for is the main argument. what you think is important that the author think is important? This is not a summary paper.