icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

review the tasks and desired dates and prepare a report on the feasibility of the time line

Please see the attachment
The Project Manager has been requested to review the tasks and desired dates and prepare a report on the feasibility of the
time line. As part of the report to management concerning the scheduling of activities, consider including visual aids and
discussing specific probabilities and the excel sheet u going to use it for solving this problem. also, you would want to
include:
1. executive summary
2. Problem statement
3. A Gantt chart for the activities and explanation of its use.
4. The network (PERT) diagram.
5. Explanation of the time it will take to complete the project with the normal times given (i.e., establish a baseline
time).
6. Based upon the baseline projections and alternatives, discuss the probabilities of completing the project at various
times and the cost consequences.
7. Use the expected time activities time you calculate as the normal times and the crash times as shown in Table 2.
8. Prepare a cash flow chart for your recommended alternative. If the cost of money is 10%, what would you recommend
with respect to early-start versus late-start?
9. Suggest other factors which might influence your decision.

Note: Please watch for plagiarism
4 marking criteria for both the assignment are as follows:

Criteria Grade descriptors
Literature Review (30% weighting) A++ to A-
Clear demonstration of a sophisticated, critical and thorough understanding of the role and nature of branding and its
diverse elements with several appropriate references B+ to B-
Clear demonstration of a well-developed, critical and comprehensive understanding of the role and nature of branding and its
diverse elements with some appropriate references.
C+ to C-Demonstration of a critical and substantial understanding of the role and nature of branding and its diverse
elements with a few references.
D+ to D-
Provides evidence of some critical understanding of the role and nature of branding and its diverse elements with at least
one reference or few inappropriate references.
E+ to E-
Work does demonstrate evidence a partial but uncritical understanding of the role and nature of branding and its diverse
elements with no references.
F
Work does not demonstrate understanding of the role and nature of branding and its diverse elements and there is absence of
references

Evidence of secondary research and analysis(30% weighting) A++ to A-
Clear evidence of extensive research on the industry, market and chosen company. Critical analysis of market and information
B+ to B-
Clear evidence of research on the industry, market and chosen company. Some analysis of market and information C+ to C-
Some evidence of research on the industry, market and chosen company. Mostly descriptive discussion, limited evidence of
analysis. D+ to D-
Limited evidence of research, descriptive and hypothetical discussion, weak interpretation E+ to E-
Limited evidence of research, descriptive and hypothetical discussion, no interpretation F
No evidence of research or analysis
Analytical Skills including campaign Goals and Social Responsibility (30% weighting) A++ to A-
The assignment demonstrates excellence in the analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of the assignment have been
critically analyzed B+ to B-
The assignment demonstrates a high degree of competence in the analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of the
assignment have been analyzed C+ to C-
The assignment demonstrates a significant degree of competence in the analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of
the assignment have been adequately analyzed D+ to D-
The assignment demonstrates a degree of competence in the analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of the assignment
have been adequately analyzed E+ to E-
The assignment demonstrates a limited competence in the analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of the assignment
have been analyzed, but rather weakly F
The assignment does not demonstrate achievement of analysis and synthesis of the issues. Both parts of the assignment have
been presented in a weak manner
Overall Structure (10% weighting) A++ to A-
The assignment is presented in a professional format, meeting all the requirements identified in the guidelines; there is a
logical flow between the sections, making it very easy to follow the arguments. The level of grammar and spelling is
excellent B* to B-
The assignment is presented in the appropriate format, meeting all the requirements identified in the guidelines; there is a
fairly logical flow between the sections, making it quite easy to follow the arguments. The level of grammar and spelling is
very good C* to C-
The assignment is presented in a report format, meeting all the requirements identified in the guidelines; there maybe a few
limitations in the logical flow between the sections, making parts of the arguments less easy to follow. The level of
grammar and spelling is acceptable D* to D-
The assignment is presented in a basic format, meeting some of the requirements identified in the guidelines; there are
limitations in the logical flow between the sections, making parts of the arguments less easy to follow. The level of
grammar and spelling is compromised E* to E-
The assignment is presented in a basic format, failing to meet the requirements identified in the guidelines; the are strong
limitations in the logical flow between the sections, making several parts of the arguments less easy to follow. The level
of grammar and spelling is seriously compromised F
The assignment is not presented in a report format and does not meet most or all of the requirements identified in the
guidelines; there are serious flaws in terms of its structure and logical flow between the sections, making it very difficult
to follow the arguments. The level of grammar and spelling is unacceptable

PG grades and marks bands are given below following Senate Regulation 3.47:

SR 3.47
Each element of assessment (other than those assessed on a pass/fail basis) shall be assessed as follows:

Indicative Mark Band Grade Grade Point
90 and above A++ 17
80-89 A+ 16
73-79 A 15
70-72 A- 14
68-69 B+ 13
63-67 B 12
60-62 B- 11
58-59 C+ 10
53-57 C 9
50-52 C- 8
48-49 D+ 7
43-47 D 6
40-42 D- 5
38-39 E+ 4
33-37 E 3
30-32 E- 2
29 and below F 1

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes