Review of Action Research StudiesOrder Description
write a summary and critique on two articles. The format is different than how it was written.The overall format that the professor wants for the action research is as follows
1.Summary of Article 1
2. Summary of Article 2
3. Critique of both articles (Using the handout as the guide)
all in APA format.I did get a 70% percent on the last paper. I attached last weeks article comparison with the professors suggestions included. Thank you so much and please email me if
you have any questions.-
Guidelines and Grading Rubric for Review of Action Research StudiesThe overall format that the professor wants for the action research is as follows
1.Summary of Article 1
2. Summary of Article 2
3. Critique of both articles (Using the handout as the guide)
all in APA format.1. Review two peer-reviewed action research studies of closely related topics;2. the review of each study includes two parts: a summary and a critique;3. In the summary, students will summarize a) the purpose (or research questions), b) the connection between the purpose and the literature, c) the design and methods,
and d) the findings of each study, with an emphasis on the findings;4. When critique, students will analyze the strengths and weakness of the each study focusing on their designs and findings, and explain how the studies inform your
own action research topics;5. APA style (6th edition) of referencing is required; APA format of levels (tiers) organization is preferred. Each Review paper will be of 3-5 pages.includes two peer-reviewed sources of literature that is related to and inform own action research interest.provides an in-depth description of empirical research that includes the following: a) question or purpose of study; b) the connection between the purpose and the
literature, c) the design and methods, and d) the findings of each study, with an emphasis on the findings.Critique of each study is highly analytical and evidence based, revealing the (in)coherence of the research elements, comparing/contrasting the designs and findings of
the two studies, and pointing out the significance of each study to own action research interest.Writing reflects depth of content and perceptiveness of the author at the graduate level. The paper is cogent, coherent, and well organized. Adheres to standard
writing conventions and appearance is professional. Contains few or no spelling and grammatical errors. Writing is essentially error-free in terms of mechanics. APA
style of referencing and coherent format of levels (tiers) are followed.