icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Review Fooled by Randomness, by Nicholas Nassim Taleb.

Review Fooled by Randomness, by Nicholas Nassim Taleb.

Order Description

Reviewing (Fooled by Randomness), by Nicholas Nassim Taleb. You can use any explicit reference and evidence to support the review, Pick at least one arguments and pull it apart in detail, what is good about it, what is bad about it etc. in doing this you also need to provide evidence and examples.

last review I didn’t get good marks 56 only and here is my teacher comments

“Ali you demonstrate that you have a broad understanding of Easterly’s key arguments, and you are able to provide evidence within the book to support this. More evidence (and explicit references) would have helped support your discussion. Where your review is lacking is primarily in the critical analysis of Easterly’s key ideas. You need to pick (at least) one of Easterly’s arguments and pull it apart in detail, what is good about it, what is bad about it etc. in doing this you also need to provide evidence and examples. Finally some parts of your review are tough to read make sure you proof read before you submit and i would suggest getting someone else to was well”.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Review Fooled by Randomness, by Nicholas Nassim Taleb.

Review Fooled by Randomness, by Nicholas Nassim Taleb.

Order Description

Reviewing (Fooled by Randomness), by Nicholas Nassim Taleb. You can use any explicit reference and evidence to support the review, Pick at least one arguments and pull it apart in detail, what is good about it, what is bad about it etc. in doing this you also need to provide evidence and examples.

last review I didn’t get good marks 56 only and here is my teacher comments

“Ali you demonstrate that you have a broad understanding of Easterly’s key arguments, and you are able to provide evidence within the book to support this. More evidence (and explicit references) would have helped support your discussion. Where your review is lacking is primarily in the critical analysis of Easterly’s key ideas. You need to pick (at least) one of Easterly’s arguments and pull it apart in detail, what is good about it, what is bad about it etc. in doing this you also need to provide evidence and examples. Finally some parts of your review are tough to read make sure you proof read before you submit and i would suggest getting someone else to was well”.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes