24/7 online - 
1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
Login
March 31st, 2017 
admin You are required to keep written status reports on your project. Each status report will keep track of everything you did with the project for a given week (what you did, problems, planning, etc). You will submit each weekly status report on Saturday of every week during the course. Using MS-Word, write your Status Report for Week 5.
| FORMAL WRITING ASSESSMENT RUBRIC | ||||
| Exceptional
(1.5 Points) |
Meets Expectation
(1.0 Point) |
Needs Improvement
(.5 Points) |
Failure
(0 Points) |
|
| Develop an unplagiarized focus / thesis / idea / viewp01oint | Writing is very clear and focused on a central idea; well developed with relevant details | Writing suitably focused on a central idea; developed with acceptable details | Writing is unclear; ideas are not developed nor connected | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Support the focus / thesis / idea / viewp01oint with materials appropriate to discipline, purpose, and audience | Very effective use of appropriate materials to address the original focus / thesis / idea / viewp01oint | Acceptable use of appropriate materials to address the original focus / thesis / idea / viewp01oint | Did not use appropriate materials to address the original focus / thesis / idea / viewp01oint | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Write formally | Formal writing very clear with no (or minimal) errors | Formal writing acceptable with few errors | Errors make the formal writing difficult to understand | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Use Standard Academic English | Very effective use of Standard Academic English with no (or minimal) errors | Acceptable use of Standard Academic English with few errors | Poor use of Standard Academic English with many errors | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Employ American Psychological Association (APA) conventions | Very effective use of APA conventions with no (or minimal) errors | Acceptable use of APA conventions with few errors | Poor use of APA conventions with many errors | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Communicate learning through writing | Writing displays excellent comprehension of subject matter | Writing displays acceptable comprehension of subject matter | Writing indicates minimal comprehension of subject matter | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Use appropriate skills and tools to revise writing | Very effective use of multiple skills and tools such as drafts, revision, and editing | Acceptable use of multiple skills and tools such as drafts, revision, and editing | Poor use of multiple skills and tools such as drafts, revision, and editing | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Reflect on work through writing | Writing indicates clear reflection on work | Writing indicates acceptable reflection on work | Writing indicates little reflection on work | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| INFORMAL WRITING ASSESSMENT RUBRIC | ||||
| Exceptional
(.5 Points) |
Meets Expectation
(.375 Points) |
Needs Improvement
(.25 Points) |
Failure
(0 Points) |
|
| Communicate Comprehension of Content | Excellent comprehension of subject matter | Acceptable comprehension of subject matter | Minimal comprehension of subject matter | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Write Informally using Standard Academic English | Very clear informal writing and very effective use of Standard Academic English with no (or minimal) errors | Informal writing and use of Standard Academic English are both acceptable with few errors | Many errors and poor use of Standard Academic English make the informal writing difficult to understand | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| CAPSTONE PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC | |||||
| Superior
(4.0 Points) |
Good
(3.0 Points) |
Fair
(2.0 Points) |
Minimal
(1.0 Point) |
Inadequate
(0 Points) |
|
| Solves the Problem | And more! | Fulfills requirements | Not completely | Minimal progress | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Identify, Integrate, and Apply Knowledge | Optimal selection and creative adaptation of concepts from CSIT courses | Integrates concepts from CSIT courses | Limited integration of CSIT concepts | No integration of CSIT concepts; Doesn’t correlate CSIT concepts to project | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Adaptability | Systematically researches, designs, makes progress, and masters the new stimuli | Relates to similar concepts; Does initial research on unfamiliar concepts; Explores and experiments with new stimuli | “Don’t know where to start” “I am lost” Initially needs to be told where to look for information; Unable to identify similar concepts | “Tell me what next” | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Self Management | Keeps concentration instructor informed; Forward thinking/planning; Thinks of extensions | Little guidance; Independent; Knows (when, where, who, what) to ask; Manages timeline; Steady progress | Considerable guidance; Handed information; Must be given milestones (assignments); Doesn’t seek guidance when necessary | Unable to progress independently | Fails to fulfill requirement |
| Robust/Useable | Fully reliable; Helpful, consistent, “production quality” interface | Mostly reliable; Understandable interface | Minimally reliable; Inadequate interface | Unreliable; Confusing interface | |
Posted in Uncategorized 
Free revisions
Free title page
Free Bibliography and Reference Pages
Free Formatting (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard and Others)