Political Ideas 2500 word Essay

Order Description
Essay Question:-
1. Evaluate Rawls’ Theory of Justice with reference to TWO of the following three critical responses: a) Norzick b) communitarianism c) Marxism. (Choose Only TWO 2)
-The essay will critically compare and contrast principal political ideas underpinning political debate in the UK political system. It should not exceed 2500 words.

Students will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Knowledge and understanding of the topic
2. The clarity of writing style
3. Ability to structure and communicate an argument
4. Use of relevant literature and quality of referencing (academic sources deployed appropriately)
5. Ability to critically engage with the ideas of others

Political Ideas 2500 word Essay

Order Description
Essay Question:-
1. Evaluate Rawls’ Theory of Justice with reference to TWO of the following three critical responses: a) Norzick b) communitarianism c) Marxism. (Choose Only TWO 2)
-The essay will critically compare and contrast principal political ideas underpinning political debate in the UK political system. It should not exceed 2500 words.

Students will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Knowledge and understanding of the topic
2. The clarity of writing style
3. Ability to structure and communicate an argument
4. Use of relevant literature and quality of referencing (academic sources deployed appropriately)
5. Ability to critically engage with the ideas of others

Political Ideas 2500 word Essay

Order Description
Essay Question:-
1. Evaluate Rawls’ Theory of Justice with reference to TWO of the following three critical responses: a) Norzick b) communitarianism c) Marxism. (Choose Only TWO 2)
-The essay will critically compare and contrast principal political ideas underpinning political debate in the UK political system. It should not exceed 2500 words.

Students will be assessed according to the following criteria:
1. Knowledge and understanding of the topic
2. The clarity of writing style
3. Ability to structure and communicate an argument
4. Use of relevant literature and quality of referencing (academic sources deployed appropriately)
5. Ability to critically engage with the ideas of others