Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Philosophy – Utilitarianism

Topic: Philosophy – Utilitarianism

Order Description
Description: Using Henry Sidgwick’s “The Methods of Ethics,” which can be found for free online: Explain the argument Sidgwick treats as a proof of utilitarianism against egoism and why, according to Sidgwick, that proof of utilitarianism against egoism fails (see esp. Methods pp. 379-384, 419-21, and 497-8). This failure helps lead to the “dualism of the practical reason”. Explain how the dualism might be interpreted as involving (a) an immediate contradiction, (b) a mediate contradiction, and (c) something less than a contradiction. What sort of evidence can be offered in favor of each of these interpretations? Which interpretation should we accept? (For this topic the key parts of the Methods are Chapters III XIII, IV II, the Concluding Chapter, and pp. xvii-xxiii; see also Some Fundamental Ethical Controversies, pp. 473-474 and 483-487)

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Philosophy – Utilitarianism

Topic: Philosophy – Utilitarianism

Order Description
Description: Using Henry Sidgwick’s “The Methods of Ethics,” which can be found for free online: Explain the argument Sidgwick treats as a proof of utilitarianism against egoism and why, according to Sidgwick, that proof of utilitarianism against egoism fails (see esp. Methods pp. 379-384, 419-21, and 497-8). This failure helps lead to the “dualism of the practical reason”. Explain how the dualism might be interpreted as involving (a) an immediate contradiction, (b) a mediate contradiction, and (c) something less than a contradiction. What sort of evidence can be offered in favor of each of these interpretations? Which interpretation should we accept? (For this topic the key parts of the Methods are Chapters III XIII, IV II, the Concluding Chapter, and pp. xvii-xxiii; see also Some Fundamental Ethical Controversies, pp. 473-474 and 483-487)

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes