he work should be on all the 17 Fallacies and for each one, a paragraph must be taken from the news, TV show, or a movie also youtube videos work as long as the paragraph (4-6 sentences) is an example of using one of the Fallacies

Philosophy

Order Description
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS: write 1-3 sentences OR answer true or false or yes or no. (Each question is worth 2 points, except question 16 is worth 9 points and questions 30 – 36 are worth 5 points each.)

Moral Relativism is a meta-ethical theory. True or False?
What is the key method in philosophy?
Is an ethical theory normative or descriptive?
What is a Meta-ethical view (as opposed to an ethical view)?
What are the two Meta-ethical views we examined?
Write a sentence that captures the Euthyphro Dilemma.
Which ‘side’ of the Dilemma do you agree with if you are an Ethical Relativist?
If you are an Ethical Realist, you believe that Right and Wrong are objective and independent of anyone’s say-so. True or False?
What is the difference between a ‘teleological’ ethical theory and a ‘deontological’ ethical theory?
For the Egoist, it is wrong to do anything that will not serve one’s own interests. True or False?
Is Glaucon right that we only behave morally well because we are afraid of punishment?
Is Utilitarianism a teleological or deontological theory?
Describe the Utilitarian ‘Principle of Utility’.
Aristotle believes that virtue is something that is learned, not something one is either born with or without. True or false?
Describe the difference between the Categorical Imperative and the Hypothetical Imperative.

This question is worth 9 points. Here is an ethical ‘thought experiment’, originally invented by philosopher Philippa Foot. It has 2 versions: version A and version B. Read both and answer briefly for both what a Kantian would do, what a Utilitarian would do:

VERSION A: You see that a runway train is hurtling down a track, and that it is going to hit a group of 5 people standing in its path and will certainly kill them all. However, you happen to be standing next to a switch that can divert the train down another track where only a single person is standing. There is no way to alert the people on the track as they are too far away, and there is no time to call for help – you must act immediately. Answer all of the following: a) What would Kant do? b) What would a Utilitarian do?

VERSION B: Now suppose that there is no switch, but that you are instead standing on a bridge over the railway track next to a very large man, and you are sure that if you pushed him onto the track his bulk (but not yours) would be sufficient to stop the train before it hit the group of people. There is no way to alert the people on the track as they are too far away, and there is no time to call for help – you must act immediately. What do you think now? Should one kill the large man? Answer all of the following: d) What would Kant do? e) What would a Utilitarian do?

Describe what is different about the cases above if you would act differently in Version A and Version B.
If you are a Virtue ethicist, you should practice virtuous acts because it will bring you money and power. True or False?
How does Aristotle suggest one work out what the right thing to do is in any given situation?
For Kant, it is rational to be immoral. True or false?
May one treat others as means to ends, according to Kant?
May one treat others as means to ends for the Utilitarian?
‘Eudaimonia’, for Aristotle, is a life full of only pleasure and doing as one pleases. True or false?
For Aristotle, we must aim our behavior at the ‘mean’ or middle. What does that involve?
Why would working on having a virtuous character make you happier than winning the lottery, according to Aristotle?
Why does Kant think that to be immoral is to be irrational?
Why does Kant think that we would follow self-imposed rules more consistently than we would follow rules imposed on us from external authorities?
Kant believes that morality is too important to trust to reason – we should base our behavior on our emotions. True or False?
If you are a Moral Relativist, can you condemn the practices of other cultures?

The following questions are worth 5 points each – more than 3 sentences may be required, but not more than a paragraph:
Should we base our morality on reason or on emotion? Explain and support your view, briefly, in terms of the ethical theories you have learned about in this course.

Do Right and Wrong exist independently of human ideas, practices, cultures and beliefs?

Read the following case study. Answer the following question, referring back to what you have learned about ethical theory in this course.
Joe is homeless. He lost his job after 20 years in the construction business, and at 50, found it difficult to find another. He slowly fell into a depression, poverty and ultimately lost everything.

Does society have a moral responsibility to do anything about people like Joe? Why or why not?

Consider the following scenario: Ava, who is very poor, is on her way to pay her rent when she drops her wallet along the way without noticing it. Bert is walking along some time later, and finds Ava’s wallet. Her contact information is printed clearly inside. The wallet contains a large sum of cash: Ava’s rent for one month. Bert works for a charity that helps homeless people. He knows that he could put 10 homeless people in a shelter for one month with Ava’s cash. What he does not know is that if Ava does not pay her rent, she, too will become homeless.

Give a Kantian analysis of what Bert should do here.
Give a Utilitarian analysis of what Bert should do.
Describe Kant’s ‘Kingdom of Ends’.
Do you believe we humans have made moral progress over time?

Philosophy

Order Description
SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS: write 1-3 sentences OR answer true or false or yes or no. (Each question is worth 2 points, except question 16 is worth 9 points and questions 30 – 36 are worth 5 points each.)

Moral Relativism is a meta-ethical theory. True or False?
What is the key method in philosophy?
Is an ethical theory normative or descriptive?
What is a Meta-ethical view (as opposed to an ethical view)?
What are the two Meta-ethical views we examined?
Write a sentence that captures the Euthyphro Dilemma.
Which ‘side’ of the Dilemma do you agree with if you are an Ethical Relativist?
If you are an Ethical Realist, you believe that Right and Wrong are objective and independent of anyone’s say-so. True or False?
What is the difference between a ‘teleological’ ethical theory and a ‘deontological’ ethical theory?
For the Egoist, it is wrong to do anything that will not serve one’s own interests. True or False?
Is Glaucon right that we only behave morally well because we are afraid of punishment?
Is Utilitarianism a teleological or deontological theory?
Describe the Utilitarian ‘Principle of Utility’.
Aristotle believes that virtue is something that is learned, not something one is either born with or without. True or false?
Describe the difference between the Categorical Imperative and the Hypothetical Imperative.

This question is worth 9 points. Here is an ethical ‘thought experiment’, originally invented by philosopher Philippa Foot. It has 2 versions: version A and version B. Read both and answer briefly for both what a Kantian would do, what a Utilitarian would do:

VERSION A: You see that a runway train is hurtling down a track, and that it is going to hit a group of 5 people standing in its path and will certainly kill them all. However, you happen to be standing next to a switch that can divert the train down another track where only a single person is standing. There is no way to alert the people on the track as they are too far away, and there is no time to call for help – you must act immediately. Answer all of the following: a) What would Kant do? b) What would a Utilitarian do?

VERSION B: Now suppose that there is no switch, but that you are instead standing on a bridge over the railway track next to a very large man, and you are sure that if you pushed him onto the track his bulk (but not yours) would be sufficient to stop the train before it hit the group of people. There is no way to alert the people on the track as they are too far away, and there is no time to call for help – you must act immediately. What do you think now? Should one kill the large man? Answer all of the following: d) What would Kant do? e) What would a Utilitarian do?

Describe what is different about the cases above if you would act differently in Version A and Version B.
If you are a Virtue ethicist, you should practice virtuous acts because it will bring you money and power. True or False?
How does Aristotle suggest one work out what the right thing to do is in any given situation?
For Kant, it is rational to be immoral. True or false?
May one treat others as means to ends, according to Kant?
May one treat others as means to ends for the Utilitarian?
‘Eudaimonia’, for Aristotle, is a life full of only pleasure and doing as one pleases. True or false?
For Aristotle, we must aim our behavior at the ‘mean’ or middle. What does that involve?
Why would working on having a virtuous character make you happier than winning the lottery, according to Aristotle?
Why does Kant think that to be immoral is to be irrational?
Why does Kant think that we would follow self-imposed rules more consistently than we would follow rules imposed on us from external authorities?
Kant believes that morality is too important to trust to reason – we should base our behavior on our emotions. True or False?
If you are a Moral Relativist, can you condemn the practices of other cultures?

The following questions are worth 5 points each – more than 3 sentences may be required, but not more than a paragraph:
Should we base our morality on reason or on emotion? Explain and support your view, briefly, in terms of the ethical theories you have learned about in this course.

Do Right and Wrong exist independently of human ideas, practices, cultures and beliefs?

Read the following case study. Answer the following question, referring back to what you have learned about ethical theory in this course.
Joe is homeless. He lost his job after 20 years in the construction business, and at 50, found it difficult to find another. He slowly fell into a depression, poverty and ultimately lost everything.

Does society have a moral responsibility to do anything about people like Joe? Why or why not?

Consider the following scenario: Ava, who is very poor, is on her way to pay her rent when she drops her wallet along the way without noticing it. Bert is walking along some time later, and finds Ava’s wallet. Her contact information is printed clearly inside. The wallet contains a large sum of cash: Ava’s rent for one month. Bert works for a charity that helps homeless people. He knows that he could put 10 homeless people in a shelter for one month with Ava’s cash. What he does not know is that if Ava does not pay her rent, she, too will become homeless.

Give a Kantian analysis of what Bert should do here.
Give a Utilitarian analysis of what Bert should do.
Describe Kant’s ‘Kingdom of Ends’.
Do you believe we humans have made moral progress over time?