icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Philosophy 

August 14th, 2017 admin




Directions: Please provide detailed and elaborate responses to the following questions.  Your response should include examples from the reading assignments.

 

1.Which of the following issues would you classify as personal moral issues, and which would you classify as social issues: pornography, war, nuclear weapons, abortion, pre-marital sex, racial discrimination, civil disobedience, labor unions, AIDS, environmentalism, drugs, homelessness, gang violence?  Your response should be at least one page in length.

 

2.Should small groups of experts make any of the major decisions for society, or should all major decisions be made by majority rule?  Explain.  Your response should be at least one half of one page in length.

 

3.Do you think that every American has the right to a college education?  Your response should be at least one half of one page in length.

 

 

4.What laws, if any, do you regard as unjust?  Why?  Your response should be at least one half of one page in length.

 

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Philosophy

November 24th, 2015 admin

Philosophy
1. Descartes affirms a metaphysical dulaism. That is he makes an ontological distinction between minds and bodies, with the former characterized as being non-spatial, and non-temporal, while the latter is characterized as being, in essence, three dimensional. He arrives at this conclusion by affirming methodical doubt such that he can conclude that he exists as a thinking thing. Please offer your assessment of his arguments for his position, and offer a critique of the view.

2. Leibniz offers an image of the universe which affirms that no two entities are identical (i.e the Identity of Indiscernables), which are structured via his notion of Pre-established harmony, which includes the relationships between minds and bodies, as well as all individual “monads.” What might one make of such a notion? Please offer a critique and analysis of this unique and elegant view.

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Philosophy

November 24th, 2015 admin

Philosophy
1. Descartes affirms a metaphysical dulaism. That is he makes an ontological distinction between minds and bodies, with the former characterized as being non-spatial, and non-temporal, while the latter is characterized as being, in essence, three dimensional. He arrives at this conclusion by affirming methodical doubt such that he can conclude that he exists as a thinking thing. Please offer your assessment of his arguments for his position, and offer a critique of the view.

2. Leibniz offers an image of the universe which affirms that no two entities are identical (i.e the Identity of Indiscernables), which are structured via his notion of Pre-established harmony, which includes the relationships between minds and bodies, as well as all individual “monads.” What might one make of such a notion? Please offer a critique and analysis of this unique and elegant view.

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

  • FREE FEATURES

    • FREE Revisions
    • FREE Title Page
    • FREE Bibliography
    • FREE Formatting
    • FREE Plagiarism Check
  • paypal