Participation

Republic: 3 branches of gov limited power tyranny in gov distrusted democracy. –separation of powers
Democracy was enforced in the late 1960s
Progressive movement:
1: 1900-1920-corporation dominated congress-the political parties.
2: put pressure on the states to institute.
3: 23 states
Initiative-when the public designs and passes legislation
Referendum-does away with an old law
Recall-remove gov from power
Direct primary-

History of the franchise
1: founding of our country 1791-1850, white property holders.
2: white to vote.
3: 15th amendment, 1870, African American males acquire the right to vote.
4: 1920, 19th amendment, women.
5: 1971, 26th amendment to 18 year olds.
African Americans were still denied the right to vote in the south.
-registration was denied to African American.
-intimidation at the polls
-poll taxes, 1966, American voters had to pay a fee to vote.
-literacy test, 1965, had to pass a test.
-white primary, disallowed from voting in the primaries.
Voting qualifications are established by the states. National gov can intervene when discrimination is an issue. Supreme court repealed section of the voting rights act. Now the southern have regained the right to come up a new set of voting.

1: Voting right- as a form of participation is the most important one;
2: using the right- vote rates

Voting trends
1: presidential elections-voting was slightly higher 1950’s, 1960’s, dip in the 1970’s+1980’s
Reasons for low voting rates:
1: alienation (don’t feel part of system);
2: late habit (at age 25)
3: annual elections (frequency of elections)
4: total number of elected officials, initiative issues.
5: decline in political party influences.

participation

Listen to the Marshal calling the court to order: https://www.oyez.org/about

Review Article III of the Constitution. What appears to be missing in terms of specific powers? Watch the debate between Justice Scalia and Justice Brier on C-SPAN http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/id/221473 (You can skip the first ten minutes of introductions if you like.)

Then read the links related to the Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission case in the Supreme Court/Judiciary folder (in addition to the commentary read the decision itself – it is ok to skim). Discuss this case in light of the different judicial philosophies represented in the Justices’ debate. How do you think this case will impact the political process?

Visit the Supreme Court website at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/ check out the “About the Supreme Court link on the left side of the page. Review the biographies of the justices. How do their backgrounds reflect on the “representative” nature of the court?

The big debate, in terms of the court, is the idea of Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism. After reading your text and the readings in the Judiciary folder, discuss the concept of Judicial Review and whether restraint or activism are in the eye of the beholder.
may not need references

participation

Listen to the Marshal calling the court to order: https://www.oyez.org/about

Review Article III of the Constitution. What appears to be missing in terms of specific powers? Watch the debate between Justice Scalia and Justice Brier on C-SPAN http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/id/221473 (You can skip the first ten minutes of introductions if you like.)

Then read the links related to the Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission case in the Supreme Court/Judiciary folder (in addition to the commentary read the decision itself – it is ok to skim). Discuss this case in light of the different judicial philosophies represented in the Justices’ debate. How do you think this case will impact the political process?

Visit the Supreme Court website at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/ check out the “About the Supreme Court link on the left side of the page. Review the biographies of the justices. How do their backgrounds reflect on the “representative” nature of the court?

The big debate, in terms of the court, is the idea of Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism. After reading your text and the readings in the Judiciary folder, discuss the concept of Judicial Review and whether restraint or activism are in the eye of the beholder.
may not need references