icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

MicroEconomics

Order Description
EVALUATE THE FOLLOWING:
Although taxpayers foot the bill for federal water sold to farmers at subsidized prices, they also eat the crops grown with that water. Because the crops are cheaper due to the subsidized water, taxpayers get back exactly what they put in, so there is no waste from having subsidized water for farmers.
Use references (if any) according to the Chicago Manual of Style, author-year (aka APA style).
clear structure: Introduction, Main Body, Conclusion
??? Introduction
?? (Well motivated topic?)
?? Is there a hypothesis / research question?
?? Is it clear what will follow?
?? Do I want to read this?
?? Main Body
?? Is the structure supporting the thesis?
?? Do claims follow logically from the reasoning?
?? Are all claims supported?
?? Are there factual errors?
?? Are technical terms (correctly) defined?
?? Is everything relevant for the hypothesis / research question?
?? Is it clear why something is mentioned?
?? Conclusion
?? Is it clear what this was about?
?? Is there a conclusion / bottom line?

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Microeconomics

Topic: Microeconomics

Order Description
Demonstrate, using economic theory, the special characteristics of agricultural markets that have prompted government interventions (price support and stabilisation, quota restrictions, subsidies, import quotas etc.) within the european union or the united states. Demonstrate the direct and indirect impact of at least 2 of these interventions on consumers, producers and taxpayers. are these policies achieving what the were designed to do in the first place?

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes