Task:
Analyze the arguments, evidence, and writing style of Michio Kaku ‘s The Future of the Mind with special attention to sections or aspects of the book that are less convincing or flawed in some way. Make sure you anchor your critique of the book to specific passages, either directly quoted or closely paraphrased. 

< p >

< pstyle=" ">

< p >

< p >

< p >

< p >

< p >

Your introduction should provide a general broad context, full biblio info about the book, and a short (1-5 sentence) summary. After the summary you should convey some kind of overall judgment, generally positive, of the book and its value. It should end with a clear thesis that advances a claim or set of claims about the problems with the book, problems that will be fully explained, illustrated and defended in the body paragraphs.

NOTE: Most, if not all, body paragraphs (you should have 3-6 of them), should contain at least two citations–either directly quoted or closely paraphrased.

< p >

< pstyle=" ">

< p >

< p >

< p >

< p >

< p >