Leading Knowledge Management for Organisational Learning

Order Description

1500 WORD,WRITE AS ESSAY
REQUIRED
Explaining Concepts—BA
1. Choose a knowledge management concept. “Ba” can be thought of as a shared space for emerging relationships.
This space can be physical (eg. office, dispersed business space), virtual (eg, email, teleconference), mental (eg. shared experiences, ideas, ideals) or any combination of them This space can be physical (eg. office, dispersed business space), virtual (eg, email, teleconference), mental (eg. shared experiences, ideas, ideals) or any combination of them
concept OF knowledge management theory.

It is important to scope this concept carefully. It should not be too large communities of practice, for example, is far too big. On the other hand, legitimate peripheral participation a concept that underpins communities of practice would be a good choice. Knowledge transfer is too large, but absorptive capacity would be another good choice. You will quickly find out if your chosen concept is too large when you undertake the next step.( make exampel of my school to explain How applied “BA” IN MY CONTEXT.
For information this is my context
High School for girls only, Duplexes, with school yard. And a small square in the upper floor with several classrooms, two special parameters “for each teacher has its own office,” administrative room, a conference room With computers and screen TV connected to a private education with telephone” and a small kitchen + dining room for workers at the school.

integrate this information in ESSAY as an example and speak ABOUT IT more extensively with the application of the concept of “BA” with the support of references

refrences
1    Alavi, Maryam & Tiwana, Amrit 2003, ‘Knowledge management: the information technology dimension’, in Easterby-Smith, Mark & Lyles, Marjorie A (eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, Blackwell, Malden, Mass., pp. 104-120.
2    Arnolds, CA & Boshoff, Christo 2002, ‘Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: an empirical assessment of Alderfer’s ERG theory’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 697-719.
3    Assmann, Jan & Czaplicka, John 1995, ‘Collective memory and cultural identity’, New German Critique, no. 65, pp. 125-133.
4    Ben-Peretz, Miriam & Schonmann, Shifra 1998, ‘Informal learning communities and their effects’, in Leithwood, Kenneth & Seashore Louis, Karen, Organizational learning in schools, Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse Netherlands, pp. 47-66.
5    Blackler, Frank 1995, ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation’, Organization Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1021-1046.
6    Brown, John Seely & Cook, Scott DN 1999, ‘Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing’, Organization Science: a Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 381-400.
7    Brown, John Seely & Duguid, Paul 1998, ‘Organising knowledge’, California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 90-111.
8    Casey, Catherine 2004, ‘Contested rationalities, contested organizations: feminist and postmodernist visions’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 302-314.
9    Cox, Andrew 2005, ‘What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works’, Journal of Information Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 527-540.
10    Cross, Rob & Prusak, Laurence 2002, ‘People who make organizations go – or stop’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, no. 6, June, pp. 105-112.
11    Davenport, Thomas H, Eccles, Robert G & Prusak, Laurence 1998, ‘Information politics’, in Klein, David A (ed.), The strategic management of intellectual capital, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 101-120.
12    Debowski, Shelda 2005, ‘Supporting knowledge management through technology’, in Debowski, Shelda, Knowledge management, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Milton, Qld., pp. 140-166.
13    Drucker, Peter F 1999, ‘Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge’, California Management Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79-94.
14    Earl, Michael 2001, ‘Knowledge management strategies: towards a taxonomy’, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 215-233.
15    Fairholm, Matthew R 2004, ‘A new sciences outline for leadership development’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 25, no. 3/4, pp. 369-386.
16    Glasser, William 1994, ‘Supervising noncoercively’, in Glasser, William HD, The Control Theory Manager: combining the control theory of William Glasser with the wisdom of W. Edwards Deming to explain both what quality is and what lead-managers do to achieve it, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, N.S.W, pp. 100-104.
17    Glasser, William HD 1994, ‘Criticism’, in Glasser, William HD, The Control Theory Manager: combining the control theory of William Glasser with the wisdom of W. Edwards Deming to explain both what quality is and what lead-managers do to achieve it, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, N.S.W, pp. 94-99.
18    Greenleaf, Robert K, Frick, Don M & Spears, Larry C 1996, ‘Coercion, manipulation, and persuasion: reflections on a strategy for change’, in Greenleaf, Robert K, Spears, Larry C & Frick, Don M (eds.), On becoming a servant-leader, 1st edn, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp. 127-148.

19    Hellstrom, Tomas & Raman, Sujatha 2001, ‘Commodification of knowledge about knowledge: knowledge management and the reification of epistemology’, Social Epistemology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 139-154.
20    Kim, Daniel H 1993, ‘Link between individual and organizational learning’, Sloan Management Review, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 37-49.
21    León, Juan Pablo Aljure 2008, ‘Systems thinking: the key for the creation of truly desired futures’, International Journal of Reality Therapy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15-20.
22    Leonard-Barton, Dorothy 1992, ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development’,Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, no. Summer , pp. 111-125.
23    Levinthal, Daniel A & March, James G 1993, ‘The myopia of learning’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 95-112.
24    Liebowitz, Jay 2005, ‘Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations’, Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76-86.
25    March, James G 1996, ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, in Cohen, Michael D & Sproull, Lee,Organizational learning, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 101-123.
26    Nonaka, Ikujiro & Konno, Noboru 1998, ‘The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation’, California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 40-54.
27    Nonaka, Ikujiro & Reinmoeller, Patrick 2000, ‘Dynamic business systems for knowledge creation and utilization’, in Chauvel, Daniele & Despres, Charles, Knowledge horizons: the present and the promise of knowledge management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 89-112.
28    O’Toole, P 2004, ‘Managing knowledge retention structures’, in Flinders University. Institute of International Education & O’Toole, Paddy, Retaining knowledge through organizational action, Flinders University Institute of International Education, Adelaide, pp. 90-113.
29    O’Toole, Kathleen Margaret (Paddy) 2001, ‘Learning through the physical environment in the workplace’, International Education Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-19.
30    Pan, Shan L & Leidner, Dorothy E 2003, ‘Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71-88.
31    Schein, Edgar H 1996, ‘Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning’, Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 9-19.

32    Seymen, Oya Aytemiz 2006, ‘The cultural diversity phenomenon in organisations and different approaches for effective cultural diversity management: a literary review’, Cross Cultural Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 296-315.
33    Szulanski, Gabriel 1996, ‘Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firms’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. Winter special issue, pp. 27-43.
34    Tsoukas, Hardidimos 1996, ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. Winter special issue, pp. 11-25.

35    Tushman, Michael L & Scanlan, Thomas J 1981, ‘Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals’,Academy of Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 83-98.

36    Vaughan, Diane 1999, ‘The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 25, pp. 271-305.

37    von Hippel, Eric 1994, ‘”Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation’, Management Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 429-439.

38    Walsh, James P & Ungson, Gerardo Rivera 1991, ‘Organizational memory’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57-91.

39    Weick, Karl E 1993, ‘Collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 628-652.

40    Zack, Michael H 2002, ‘Developing a knowledge strategy’, in Choo, Chun Wei, Bontis, Nick & ebrary, Inc, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 255-276.

Leading Knowledge Management for Organisational Learning

Order Description

1500 WORD,WRITE AS ESSAY
REQUIRED
Explaining Concepts—BA
1. Choose a knowledge management concept. “Ba” can be thought of as a shared space for emerging relationships.
This space can be physical (eg. office, dispersed business space), virtual (eg, email, teleconference), mental (eg. shared experiences, ideas, ideals) or any combination of them This space can be physical (eg. office, dispersed business space), virtual (eg, email, teleconference), mental (eg. shared experiences, ideas, ideals) or any combination of them
concept OF knowledge management theory.

It is important to scope this concept carefully. It should not be too large communities of practice, for example, is far too big. On the other hand, legitimate peripheral participation a concept that underpins communities of practice would be a good choice. Knowledge transfer is too large, but absorptive capacity would be another good choice. You will quickly find out if your chosen concept is too large when you undertake the next step.( make exampel of my school to explain How applied “BA” IN MY CONTEXT.
For information this is my context
High School for girls only, Duplexes, with school yard. And a small square in the upper floor with several classrooms, two special parameters “for each teacher has its own office,” administrative room, a conference room With computers and screen TV connected to a private education with telephone” and a small kitchen + dining room for workers at the school.

integrate this information in ESSAY as an example and speak ABOUT IT more extensively with the application of the concept of “BA” with the support of references

refrences
1    Alavi, Maryam & Tiwana, Amrit 2003, ‘Knowledge management: the information technology dimension’, in Easterby-Smith, Mark & Lyles, Marjorie A (eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, Blackwell, Malden, Mass., pp. 104-120.
2    Arnolds, CA & Boshoff, Christo 2002, ‘Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: an empirical assessment of Alderfer’s ERG theory’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 697-719.
3    Assmann, Jan & Czaplicka, John 1995, ‘Collective memory and cultural identity’, New German Critique, no. 65, pp. 125-133.
4    Ben-Peretz, Miriam & Schonmann, Shifra 1998, ‘Informal learning communities and their effects’, in Leithwood, Kenneth & Seashore Louis, Karen, Organizational learning in schools, Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse Netherlands, pp. 47-66.
5    Blackler, Frank 1995, ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation’, Organization Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1021-1046.
6    Brown, John Seely & Cook, Scott DN 1999, ‘Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing’, Organization Science: a Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 381-400.
7    Brown, John Seely & Duguid, Paul 1998, ‘Organising knowledge’, California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 90-111.
8    Casey, Catherine 2004, ‘Contested rationalities, contested organizations: feminist and postmodernist visions’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 302-314.
9    Cox, Andrew 2005, ‘What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works’, Journal of Information Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 527-540.
10    Cross, Rob & Prusak, Laurence 2002, ‘People who make organizations go – or stop’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 80, no. 6, June, pp. 105-112.
11    Davenport, Thomas H, Eccles, Robert G & Prusak, Laurence 1998, ‘Information politics’, in Klein, David A (ed.), The strategic management of intellectual capital, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 101-120.
12    Debowski, Shelda 2005, ‘Supporting knowledge management through technology’, in Debowski, Shelda, Knowledge management, John Wiley & Sons Australia, Milton, Qld., pp. 140-166.
13    Drucker, Peter F 1999, ‘Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge’, California Management Review, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79-94.
14    Earl, Michael 2001, ‘Knowledge management strategies: towards a taxonomy’, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 215-233.
15    Fairholm, Matthew R 2004, ‘A new sciences outline for leadership development’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 25, no. 3/4, pp. 369-386.
16    Glasser, William 1994, ‘Supervising noncoercively’, in Glasser, William HD, The Control Theory Manager: combining the control theory of William Glasser with the wisdom of W. Edwards Deming to explain both what quality is and what lead-managers do to achieve it, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, N.S.W, pp. 100-104.
17    Glasser, William HD 1994, ‘Criticism’, in Glasser, William HD, The Control Theory Manager: combining the control theory of William Glasser with the wisdom of W. Edwards Deming to explain both what quality is and what lead-managers do to achieve it, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, N.S.W, pp. 94-99.
18    Greenleaf, Robert K, Frick, Don M & Spears, Larry C 1996, ‘Coercion, manipulation, and persuasion: reflections on a strategy for change’, in Greenleaf, Robert K, Spears, Larry C & Frick, Don M (eds.), On becoming a servant-leader, 1st edn, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, pp. 127-148.

19    Hellstrom, Tomas & Raman, Sujatha 2001, ‘Commodification of knowledge about knowledge: knowledge management and the reification of epistemology’, Social Epistemology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 139-154.
20    Kim, Daniel H 1993, ‘Link between individual and organizational learning’, Sloan Management Review, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 37-49.
21    León, Juan Pablo Aljure 2008, ‘Systems thinking: the key for the creation of truly desired futures’, International Journal of Reality Therapy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15-20.
22    Leonard-Barton, Dorothy 1992, ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development’,Strategic Management Journal, vol. 13, no. Summer , pp. 111-125.
23    Levinthal, Daniel A & March, James G 1993, ‘The myopia of learning’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 95-112.
24    Liebowitz, Jay 2005, ‘Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations’, Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76-86.
25    March, James G 1996, ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, in Cohen, Michael D & Sproull, Lee,Organizational learning, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 101-123.
26    Nonaka, Ikujiro & Konno, Noboru 1998, ‘The concept of “ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation’, California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 40-54.
27    Nonaka, Ikujiro & Reinmoeller, Patrick 2000, ‘Dynamic business systems for knowledge creation and utilization’, in Chauvel, Daniele & Despres, Charles, Knowledge horizons: the present and the promise of knowledge management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 89-112.
28    O’Toole, P 2004, ‘Managing knowledge retention structures’, in Flinders University. Institute of International Education & O’Toole, Paddy, Retaining knowledge through organizational action, Flinders University Institute of International Education, Adelaide, pp. 90-113.
29    O’Toole, Kathleen Margaret (Paddy) 2001, ‘Learning through the physical environment in the workplace’, International Education Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10-19.
30    Pan, Shan L & Leidner, Dorothy E 2003, ‘Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71-88.
31    Schein, Edgar H 1996, ‘Three cultures of management: the key to organizational learning’, Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 9-19.

32    Seymen, Oya Aytemiz 2006, ‘The cultural diversity phenomenon in organisations and different approaches for effective cultural diversity management: a literary review’, Cross Cultural Management, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 296-315.
33    Szulanski, Gabriel 1996, ‘Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firms’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. Winter special issue, pp. 27-43.
34    Tsoukas, Hardidimos 1996, ‘The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. Winter special issue, pp. 11-25.

35    Tushman, Michael L & Scanlan, Thomas J 1981, ‘Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals’,Academy of Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 83-98.

36    Vaughan, Diane 1999, ‘The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 25, pp. 271-305.

37    von Hippel, Eric 1994, ‘”Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation’, Management Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 429-439.

38    Walsh, James P & Ungson, Gerardo Rivera 1991, ‘Organizational memory’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57-91.

39    Weick, Karl E 1993, ‘Collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 628-652.

40    Zack, Michael H 2002, ‘Developing a knowledge strategy’, in Choo, Chun Wei, Bontis, Nick & ebrary, Inc, The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 255-276.