icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN NURSING

 

Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)

Writing Style: APA

Number of sources: 3

 

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN NURSING

 

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:
1. The purpose of the program or project.
2. The target population or audience.
3. The benefits of the program or project
4. The cost or budget justification.
5. The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.
Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:
1. Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?
2. What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?
Submit the written proposal along with the “Executive Summary Feedback Form.”
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Leadership and management in nursing

Leadership and management in nursing

Read Chapter 3  In Grohar-Murray, M.E., & Langan, J. C. (2011). Leadership and management in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Please note that I currently work as the Assistant director of Nursing in a rehabilitation center ( Nursing home)  please refer to this in this paper wherever it fits

Please use the Assignment 5 Rubric (below) to create an outline of the  assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of  the  final paper and could become the headings.
Answer the questions on the Communication Style Evaluation in your text (page  76) of , and appraise the list of communication skills that follow the questions. In a 3 page paper in APA format, write a summary of your communication style
Read Chapter 3  In Grohar-Murray, M.E., & Langan, J. C. (2011). Leadership and management in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
.
o    Provide your answers to the Communication Style Evaluation questions
o    Summarize your communication style
o    What areas would you like to develop and why?
o    What resources would you use and why? Include a minimum of two scholarly references
Include a minimum of 3  APA scholarly references in total (THE REFERENCES  MUST BE LESS THAN 5 YEARS)- ONE REFERENCE FROM THE ABOVE TEXTBOOK FROM CHAPTER 2  PLUS ADDITIONAL 2 OTHER REFERENCES
Assignment 5 Rubric
Competency    18—16 points    15—7 points    6—1 points    0 points    Points Earned
Answers all of the questions on the communication style evaluation with detail.    Answers al 5l of the questions on the communication style evaluation with detail.    Answers all 5 of questions on the communication style evaluation, lacks detail.    Answers less than 5 questions on the communication style evaluation.    Does not answer questions on the communication style evaluation.    /18
Summarizes communication style    Summarizes communication style with detail.    Summarizes communication style with little detail.    Inadequate summary of communication style.    Does not summarize communication style    /18
Identifies areas requiring development with good detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with good detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with little detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with no detail.    Does not identify areas requiring development.    /18
Explains why these areas need development.    Explains why these areas need development with good detail.    Explains why these areas need development with little detail    Inadequate explanation of  why these areas need development    Does not explain why these areas need development.    /18
Supports selection of resources for these areas of development.    Supports selection of resources for these areas of development.    Identifies 3 or more resources for areas of development but does not support selection    Identifies less than 3 resources for areas of development    Does not identify resources for areas of development    /18
Competency    10–8 points    7–5 points    4—1 points    Points Earned    Points Earned
Organization
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, usage, and typing
Sources
APA    Organization is logical, ideas are clear, and transitions are smooth.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage correct and consistent with Standard American English.
No typographical errors.
References are relevant, scholarly and contemporary.
Correct APA format.    Organization good, ideas usually clear and transitions usually smooth.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good and consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding.
There are a few minor typographical errors.
Minimum two references are relevant, scholarly and contemporary
Minimal APA format errors.    Organization minimally effective problems with clarity and/or transitions.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage distracting and could interfere with meaning or understanding.
There are multiple typographical errors
One reference is relevant, scholarly and contemporary.
Poor use of APA format    Organization does not meet requirements.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics and/or usage interfere with understanding and do not reflect scholarly writing. There are major typographical errors.
Poor use and/or selection of references, or no references.
No use of APA format.    /10
Total    /100

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Leadership and management in nursing

Leadership and management in nursing

Read Chapter 3  In Grohar-Murray, M.E., & Langan, J. C. (2011). Leadership and management in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Please note that I currently work as the Assistant director of Nursing in a rehabilitation center ( Nursing home)  please refer to this in this paper wherever it fits

Please use the Assignment 5 Rubric (below) to create an outline of the  assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of  the  final paper and could become the headings.
Answer the questions on the Communication Style Evaluation in your text (page  76) of , and appraise the list of communication skills that follow the questions. In a 3 page paper in APA format, write a summary of your communication style
Read Chapter 3  In Grohar-Murray, M.E., & Langan, J. C. (2011). Leadership and management in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
.
o    Provide your answers to the Communication Style Evaluation questions
o    Summarize your communication style
o    What areas would you like to develop and why?
o    What resources would you use and why? Include a minimum of two scholarly references
Include a minimum of 3  APA scholarly references in total (THE REFERENCES  MUST BE LESS THAN 5 YEARS)- ONE REFERENCE FROM THE ABOVE TEXTBOOK FROM CHAPTER 2  PLUS ADDITIONAL 2 OTHER REFERENCES
Assignment 5 Rubric
Competency    18—16 points    15—7 points    6—1 points    0 points    Points Earned
Answers all of the questions on the communication style evaluation with detail.    Answers al 5l of the questions on the communication style evaluation with detail.    Answers all 5 of questions on the communication style evaluation, lacks detail.    Answers less than 5 questions on the communication style evaluation.    Does not answer questions on the communication style evaluation.    /18
Summarizes communication style    Summarizes communication style with detail.    Summarizes communication style with little detail.    Inadequate summary of communication style.    Does not summarize communication style    /18
Identifies areas requiring development with good detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with good detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with little detail.    Identifies areas requiring development with no detail.    Does not identify areas requiring development.    /18
Explains why these areas need development.    Explains why these areas need development with good detail.    Explains why these areas need development with little detail    Inadequate explanation of  why these areas need development    Does not explain why these areas need development.    /18
Supports selection of resources for these areas of development.    Supports selection of resources for these areas of development.    Identifies 3 or more resources for areas of development but does not support selection    Identifies less than 3 resources for areas of development    Does not identify resources for areas of development    /18
Competency    10–8 points    7–5 points    4—1 points    Points Earned    Points Earned
Organization
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, usage, and typing
Sources
APA    Organization is logical, ideas are clear, and transitions are smooth.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage correct and consistent with Standard American English.
No typographical errors.
References are relevant, scholarly and contemporary.
Correct APA format.    Organization good, ideas usually clear and transitions usually smooth.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good and consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding.
There are a few minor typographical errors.
Minimum two references are relevant, scholarly and contemporary
Minimal APA format errors.    Organization minimally effective problems with clarity and/or transitions.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage distracting and could interfere with meaning or understanding.
There are multiple typographical errors
One reference is relevant, scholarly and contemporary.
Poor use of APA format    Organization does not meet requirements.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics and/or usage interfere with understanding and do not reflect scholarly writing. There are major typographical errors.
Poor use and/or selection of references, or no references.
No use of APA format.    /10
Total    /100

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes