1. How does your self-reflection compare with the 360-degree evaluation of others (that is, is there a coherence between how you see yourself and how you are seen by others)? In addition, what does that tell you about your leadership style?

2. Reflect on the information derived from the instruments and discuss the extent to which they match with your experience, including the feedback you may have received from others.

Leadership

Order Description

write a case analysis by answering these five questions.

You will be provided with a series of questions to guide your case analysis. The duration of the response should be no longer than 2 pages. Please do not add irrelevant material to get to page 2.

These are the questions:
1. What are the relevant facts of the case?
2. What are the ethical issues involved in this case?
3. Who are the Primary Stakeholders?
4. Who are the Secondary Stakeholders?
5. What are the practical constraints in this situation?
6. What would you do to resolve the matter?

This is the case:
A Good Team Player

Topic: Leadership

Characters: Steven, Assistant Department Manager

Kristin, Newly appointed supervisor of Steven’s work section

Having done well as a staff accountant in the accounts payable section of a major industrial firm for several years since his graduation from college, Steven felt that he had learned much about the “ins” and “outs” of survival in an intensely bureaucratic organization. It is thus not surprising that he was relaxed and unconcerned about his circumstances at the company as he entered the employee lounge to attend the late-afternoon welcoming reception for his new supervisor.
The new manager of accounts payable, Kristin, had been transferred to Steven’s division from a similar position in another subsidiary of the company because of her proven talent for organizing and improving the efficiency of operations there. A no-nonsense type of manager, Kristin was experienced and determined to perform her new assignment with the same vigor that had brought her so much success throughout her career.

At the reception, Kristin circulated through the room, introducing herself to her new subordinates and asking each of them if they had any suggestions that would help make the payables section a better place to work. When she approached Steven, he told her about something that had been on his mind lately: that people seemed to him to gain promotions and be given opportunities to work overtime based on who liked them, and not on the quality of their work. In reply, Kristin politely stated that she would do everything that she could to see that whatever it was he was referring to would have no place in the team she would lead.

Upon his arrival at work the next day, Steven received a phone call from Kristin’s secretary asking that he meet with his new boss later that morning. He had barely entered her office for the meeting when she looked him straight in the eye and said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not good team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe that there are people in this office who are not acting in the best interests of the company, and I want to know who. I want you to tell me the names of the managers you were referring to note, and keep me informed if you see anyone hurting this company, or
I’ve got to think that maybe you’re part of the problems around here.” Stunned by both the tone and content of her statement, Steven quickly tried to think of a way to respond.

Leadership

Order Description

write a case analysis by answering these five questions.

You will be provided with a series of questions to guide your case analysis. The duration of the response should be no longer than 2 pages. Please do not add irrelevant material to get to page 2.

These are the questions:
1. What are the relevant facts of the case?
2. What are the ethical issues involved in this case?
3. Who are the Primary Stakeholders?
4. Who are the Secondary Stakeholders?
5. What are the practical constraints in this situation?
6. What would you do to resolve the matter?

This is the case:
A Good Team Player

Topic: Leadership

Characters: Steven, Assistant Department Manager

Kristin, Newly appointed supervisor of Steven’s work section

Having done well as a staff accountant in the accounts payable section of a major industrial firm for several years since his graduation from college, Steven felt that he had learned much about the “ins” and “outs” of survival in an intensely bureaucratic organization. It is thus not surprising that he was relaxed and unconcerned about his circumstances at the company as he entered the employee lounge to attend the late-afternoon welcoming reception for his new supervisor.
The new manager of accounts payable, Kristin, had been transferred to Steven’s division from a similar position in another subsidiary of the company because of her proven talent for organizing and improving the efficiency of operations there. A no-nonsense type of manager, Kristin was experienced and determined to perform her new assignment with the same vigor that had brought her so much success throughout her career.

At the reception, Kristin circulated through the room, introducing herself to her new subordinates and asking each of them if they had any suggestions that would help make the payables section a better place to work. When she approached Steven, he told her about something that had been on his mind lately: that people seemed to him to gain promotions and be given opportunities to work overtime based on who liked them, and not on the quality of their work. In reply, Kristin politely stated that she would do everything that she could to see that whatever it was he was referring to would have no place in the team she would lead.

Upon his arrival at work the next day, Steven received a phone call from Kristin’s secretary asking that he meet with his new boss later that morning. He had barely entered her office for the meeting when she looked him straight in the eye and said, “I will not tolerate individuals in this organization who are not good team players. Yesterday afternoon you led me to believe that there are people in this office who are not acting in the best interests of the company, and I want to know who. I want you to tell me the names of the managers you were referring to note, and keep me informed if you see anyone hurting this company, or
I’ve got to think that maybe you’re part of the problems around here.” Stunned by both the tone and content of her statement, Steven quickly tried to think of a way to respond.