LAW 5206 –Corporations Law

Name:
Student number:
Word count (without footnotes) (maximum allowed 4000):
State any approved extension date and attach the course leader’s approval:

Question 1:        /30
Question 2:        /30
Total marks awarded:   /60
Criteria
F    C    B    A    HD
Quality of analysis and problem-solving skills:     Identifies legal issue/problem     Noclear identification of legal issues relevant tothe caseand/or issues identified arenotrelevant.    Identifiesat leastonelegal issuerelevant to the casebut moredetailis required.    Identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe casebutlacks clarity.    Correctly identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe case.    Correctly identifiesall legalissues relevanttothe case.
Evaluates relevant legal principles    Lack of relevant legal principles orthose identified are incorrect
Outlinessome relevantlegal principlesbut citationof applicablecases and/orstatutory provisionsneeds more detail.    Outlines some relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.    Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/or statutory provisions.    Outlinesall relevantlegal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.
Develops logical conclusion    Stated conclusionis
notalignedwith thequestion fails totie together legal arguments either foror againstthe application of legal principles.    Stated conclusionis broadlyaligned withthe question and ties together some legal argumentsfor the application oflegal principles.    Stated conclusion broadlyanswers thequestion, andties togethersome legal arguments forandagainst the application ofparticular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe questionand ties together mostthelegal arguments for andagainstthe application of particular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe question,and logicallyties togetherthe legalarguments for andagainst the application ofparticular legalprinciples.
20 Marks    0-9    10-12    13-15    16-17    18-20
Quality of research skills:

Research
Little or no evidence of original research
Evidence of some original research    Evidence of original research from a number of different sources    Evidence of a high level of original research    Evidence of a high level of original research which enhances application and analysis
Citation and referencing    Many errors and/or little or no attempt made at referencing    Mostly accurate – some minor errors    Consistently correct
5 Marks    0    1-2    3    4    5
Quality of communication skills:

Writing style, grammar and spelling
Inappropriate style, tone and/or choice of language or many errors of spelling and/or grammar.    Mostly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar mostly accurate.    Appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Accurate spelling and grammar.    Highly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar consistently accurate.
Structure – also including brief introduction, body and brief conclusion
Poor structure and/or use of paragraphs or headings    Mostly appropriate structure and/or some use of paragraphs or headings to enhance readability    Appropriate structure and use of paragraphs or headings
Excellent structure and use of paragraphs or headings

5 Marks    0-1    2-3    4    5
MARKING CRITERIA FOR LAW5206 ASSIGNMENT 2 Question 1

Question 1 (30 marks)
Write Maximum of 2000 word answer here:

MARKING CRITERIA FOR LAW5206 ASSIGNMENT 2 Question 2
Criteria
F    C    B    A    HD
Quality of analysis and problem-solving skills:     Identifies legal issue/problem     Noclear identification of legal issues relevant tothe caseand/or issues identified arenotrelevant.    Identifiesat leastonelegal issuerelevant to the casebut moredetailis required.    Identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe casebutlacks clarity.    Correctly identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe case.    Correctly identifiesall legalissues relevanttothe case.
Evaluates relevant legal principles    Lack of relevant legal principles orthose identified are incorrect
Outlinessome relevantlegal principlesbut citationof applicablecases and/orstatutory provisionsneeds more detail.    Outlines some relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.    Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/or statutory provisions.    Outlinesall relevantlegal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.
Develops logical conclusion    Stated conclusionis
notalignedwith thequestion fails totie together legal arguments either foror againstthe application of legal principles.    Stated conclusionis broadlyaligned withthe question and ties together some legal argumentsfor the application oflegal principles.    Stated conclusion broadlyanswers thequestion, andties togethersome legal arguments forandagainst the application ofparticular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe questionand ties together mostthelegal arguments for andagainstthe application of particular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe question,and logicallyties togetherthe legalarguments for andagainst the application ofparticular legalprinciples.
20 Marks    0-9    10-12    13-15    16-17    18-20
Quality of research skills:

Research
Little or no evidence of original research
Evidence of some original research    Evidence of original research from a number of different sources    Evidence of a high level of original research    Evidence of a high level of original research which enhances application and analysis
Citation and referencing    Many errors and/or little or no attempt made at referencing    Mostly accurate – some minor errors    Consistently correct
5 Marks    0    1-2    3    4    5
Quality of communication skills:

Letter format     Poor structure and/or miss formal letter elements     Mostly appropriate structure and/or some use of formal letter elements     Appropriate structure and use of most of the formal letter elements
Excellent structure and use all of the formal letter elements

Writing style, grammar and spelling
Inappropriate style, tone and/or choice of language or many errors of spelling and/or grammar.    Mostly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar mostly accurate.    Appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Accurate spelling and grammar.    Highly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar consistently accurate.
5 Marks    0-1    2-3    4    5

Question 2 (30 marks)
Write Maximum of 2000 word answer here:

LAW 5206 –Corporations Law

Name:
Student number:
Word count (without footnotes) (maximum allowed 4000):
State any approved extension date and attach the course leader’s approval:

Question 1:        /30
Question 2:        /30
Total marks awarded:   /60
Criteria
F    C    B    A    HD
Quality of analysis and problem-solving skills:     Identifies legal issue/problem     Noclear identification of legal issues relevant tothe caseand/or issues identified arenotrelevant.    Identifiesat leastonelegal issuerelevant to the casebut moredetailis required.    Identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe casebutlacks clarity.    Correctly identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe case.    Correctly identifiesall legalissues relevanttothe case.
Evaluates relevant legal principles    Lack of relevant legal principles orthose identified are incorrect
Outlinessome relevantlegal principlesbut citationof applicablecases and/orstatutory provisionsneeds more detail.    Outlines some relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.    Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/or statutory provisions.    Outlinesall relevantlegal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.
Develops logical conclusion    Stated conclusionis
notalignedwith thequestion fails totie together legal arguments either foror againstthe application of legal principles.    Stated conclusionis broadlyaligned withthe question and ties together some legal argumentsfor the application oflegal principles.    Stated conclusion broadlyanswers thequestion, andties togethersome legal arguments forandagainst the application ofparticular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe questionand ties together mostthelegal arguments for andagainstthe application of particular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe question,and logicallyties togetherthe legalarguments for andagainst the application ofparticular legalprinciples.
20 Marks    0-9    10-12    13-15    16-17    18-20
Quality of research skills:

Research
Little or no evidence of original research
Evidence of some original research    Evidence of original research from a number of different sources    Evidence of a high level of original research    Evidence of a high level of original research which enhances application and analysis
Citation and referencing    Many errors and/or little or no attempt made at referencing    Mostly accurate – some minor errors    Consistently correct
5 Marks    0    1-2    3    4    5
Quality of communication skills:

Writing style, grammar and spelling
Inappropriate style, tone and/or choice of language or many errors of spelling and/or grammar.    Mostly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar mostly accurate.    Appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Accurate spelling and grammar.    Highly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar consistently accurate.
Structure – also including brief introduction, body and brief conclusion
Poor structure and/or use of paragraphs or headings    Mostly appropriate structure and/or some use of paragraphs or headings to enhance readability    Appropriate structure and use of paragraphs or headings
Excellent structure and use of paragraphs or headings

5 Marks    0-1    2-3    4    5
MARKING CRITERIA FOR LAW5206 ASSIGNMENT 2 Question 1

Question 1 (30 marks)
Write Maximum of 2000 word answer here:

MARKING CRITERIA FOR LAW5206 ASSIGNMENT 2 Question 2
Criteria
F    C    B    A    HD
Quality of analysis and problem-solving skills:     Identifies legal issue/problem     Noclear identification of legal issues relevant tothe caseand/or issues identified arenotrelevant.    Identifiesat leastonelegal issuerelevant to the casebut moredetailis required.    Identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe casebutlacks clarity.    Correctly identifiesmost legal issues relevant tothe case.    Correctly identifiesall legalissues relevanttothe case.
Evaluates relevant legal principles    Lack of relevant legal principles orthose identified are incorrect
Outlinessome relevantlegal principlesbut citationof applicablecases and/orstatutory provisionsneeds more detail.    Outlines some relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.    Outlines all relevant legal principles, citing
applicablecases and/or statutory provisions.    Outlinesall relevantlegal principles, citing
applicablecases and/orstatutory provisions.
Develops logical conclusion    Stated conclusionis
notalignedwith thequestion fails totie together legal arguments either foror againstthe application of legal principles.    Stated conclusionis broadlyaligned withthe question and ties together some legal argumentsfor the application oflegal principles.    Stated conclusion broadlyanswers thequestion, andties togethersome legal arguments forandagainst the application ofparticular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe questionand ties together mostthelegal arguments for andagainstthe application of particular legal principles.    Stated conclusion answersthe question,and logicallyties togetherthe legalarguments for andagainst the application ofparticular legalprinciples.
20 Marks    0-9    10-12    13-15    16-17    18-20
Quality of research skills:

Research
Little or no evidence of original research
Evidence of some original research    Evidence of original research from a number of different sources    Evidence of a high level of original research    Evidence of a high level of original research which enhances application and analysis
Citation and referencing    Many errors and/or little or no attempt made at referencing    Mostly accurate – some minor errors    Consistently correct
5 Marks    0    1-2    3    4    5
Quality of communication skills:

Letter format     Poor structure and/or miss formal letter elements     Mostly appropriate structure and/or some use of formal letter elements     Appropriate structure and use of most of the formal letter elements
Excellent structure and use all of the formal letter elements

Writing style, grammar and spelling
Inappropriate style, tone and/or choice of language or many errors of spelling and/or grammar.    Mostly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar mostly accurate.    Appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Accurate spelling and grammar.    Highly appropriate style, tone and/or choice of language. Spelling and grammar consistently accurate.
5 Marks    0-1    2-3    4    5

Question 2 (30 marks)
Write Maximum of 2000 word answer here: