Professors Comments (RED part of paper needs editing)

***You were expected to complete a search for the best available evidence and critically appraise the evidence.

***You were to write a very clear, descriptive and in-depth narrative synthesis 4-8 pages of evidence so they reveal the current state of knowledge on the topic.

***This was to include description of common themes found in the literature/sources.
Identification of consistencies and contradictions in the literature/sources.
Identification of gaps in the existing body of knowledge.

***The sources that were discussed in the summary were not in depth related to any studies. Two of the sources mentioned you discussed renal caths. You must do an in-depth and detailed description of the findings from the sources related to PIV caths. Please make sure that you include all sources from your table in your summary.

***Your table must be in alphabetical order, last name first of the author.

***Please include the conclusion on your table summary as well.

***WEAKNESS MISSING on one source of the table (Kimberly Morrison RN, MSN, PCCN  Karyn E. Holt PhD, CNM (2015)

ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS
You should develop both an evidence table (see EBP project proposal paper template) and narrative synthesis. You need to write a very clear, descriptive and in-depth narrative synthesis 4-8 pages) of evidence so they reveal the current state of knowledge on the topic (see sample integrative reviews). Include in the narrative the following:

-Description of common themes found in the literature/sources.

-Identification of consistencies and contradictions in the literature/sources.

-Identification of gaps in the existing body of knowledge.

Please review the readings, sample paper, and grading rubric for guidance. Use the EBP Project Paper Template and insert module writing requirements. Submit paper in entirety with each module assignment.

Criteria to address:

-Introduction to section:  PICO(T), keywords, and a minimum of three relevant databases searched

-Table which includes a minimum of 8 sources of evidence

-Narrative Synthesis