investment presentation

Do 6 speech for out presentation, you need to do 1800words for 6 people.
300words each. Download doc at : http://pan.baidu.com/s/1jGKgHQQ?qq-pf-to=pcqq.c2c#path=%252F

Our presentation is in small groups, there are six people, lily is the customer, the other five are consultants the Britain group mate is talk about our product diversification and employment review, in our presentation, the important point is the customer raise this issue needs to be well designed, our presentation comes from her to raise this issue,

you need to do the background and references too

GROUP PRESENTATION  2014/ 2015

Module Title:
Investment and Portfolio Management    Module No:    BHA0019

LEARNING OUTCOMES

This assignment assesses the following learning outcomes:

Knowledge Outcomes

On completion of this module students will:

4.     Be able to contrast the theoretical approaches to portfolio management with reported practice and their own experience from participation in the ‘Portfolio Game’.
5.   Be aware of the opportunities and dangers offered by international diversification, and to explain some of the available hedging techniques.
6.     Explain the issues involved in managing investment portfolios and the impact of performance data on investors and portfolio managers.

Ability Outcomes

7.     Recognise the main characteristics of various types of investment and to apply them in         scenarios considering various investment alternatives and or combinations.
8.     Manage a portfolio of securities and be aware of the difficulties associated with portfolio         management.
9.     Present information, analysis and recommendations in a clear, concise and professional         manner.

Presentation Requirement:

As part of the assessment for this module you are required to make a presentation as part of a group, this represents 50% of the module mark.

Groups
Groups will consist of a maximum of six people and must be formed by week four at the very latest.  Any students not in a group will be put together to form one. Previous experience suggests that groups with a range of pathways, nationalities and a mixture of male/female are able to call upon a greater range of abilities for this exercise. Your group should meet regularly to participate in the Portfolio Game to comply with the strict regulatory requirements – it is suggested that you regularly consider and discuss your ideas for the presentation and must keep a record of each meeting in the form of minutes.

If there are any problems within the groups you should firstly try to resolve them yourselves, if this fails then make an appointment to discuss it with John English the module leader.  Peer review of the assessment will be available to any group that requests it otherwise all group members will receive the same mark.

Dates
Presentations will take place in the last two weeks of term two and will be organised after the Xmas break once you have had the opportunity to watch and consider 2 x DVDs of previous A-graded presentations from previous years.

Theories and research
For the presentations I expect you to discuss and explain relevant theories and to back up your discussion with academic references.  I suggest that if you have not done so yet you explore Summon on the library computer system. You must cite from academic refereed journals.

The actual presentation
Your presentation should last between 17 and 22 minutes.
You will be stopped and not allowed to continue if you reach 22 minutes.
A question and answer session will follow the presentation lasting up to 15 minutes.
Some form of visual aids should be used, PowerPoint will be available.
You must produce a group handout of your presentation which should include useful supporting material that adds value to your presentation; these should incorporate consideration of the individual’s personal development whilst participating in the learning experience provided by the “Portfolio Game” as a minimum.

You will receive your mark and written feedback within three weeks of the presentation date, however every effort will be made to give this sooner as Google Documents will be used to capture the data at the time of the assessment.  This may be delayed if a group decide they want to peer review assessment mark.

Topics
Presentation topics are to be determined by each group although experience suggests that most teams at this level perform better when they create a role play scenario using the learning experiences that are gained by their active involvement in the “Portfolio Game” as demonstrated by the two DVDs that will be shown during the early tutorials in term two.

At various times during term two you will be asked to discuss your presentation ideas with the tutor and appropriate guidance will be offered at that time. At any time a group can decide to produce a more traditional “academic” style presentation based on a suitable question which must be approved by the module leader/tutor.

A proportion of marks between 5/10% will be determined from a number of innovative practices that have been developed to enhance your personal development, employability and potential final presentation mark. Credit will be given for:-

1.    Completing an initial, interim and final review of your employability competences that will be used to support your presentation.
2.    Completing a number of formative presentations during the module tutorial sessions, these will be used as formative exercises to develop and enhance your presentation skills for this assignment.
3.    Completing a number of peer reviews of the formative presentations delivered by the other teams within your tutorial group. These reviews will provide feedback to the presenting team and to allow the reviewer to become more critically aware of the requirements for the final presentation by comparing and contrasting these tutorial presentations and also participating in the question and answer sessions that follow each formative presentation.

You are advised to:

•    Avoid mere description of the content of material referred to – critical evaluation is required where specified
•    Read widely from textbooks, journals and authoritative financial press commentaries in forming your views.
•    Pay close attention to the Assessment Criteria at the end of this document – this lists the specific criteria to the requirements of this assignment.  These specific criteria will be used to provide feedback on your marked assignment.
•    Use the new APA 6th referencing guide – badly referenced material will lose you marks (make sure you consult the Learning Development Group Tutors (BS building level 1) for any additional help needed)
•    Do not exceed the time limit (22 minutes); you will be stopped at 22minutes and will therefore only be marked on your presentation up to that point
•    Be fully prepared for the question and answer session that immediately follows your presentation that will last 15 minutes

Time Limit:    35 minutes maximum, you will be stopped at 22 minutes for your presentation to allow for the Q and A session.

Submission Date:
Last two weeks of term two. Feedback will be given within three weeks if not sooner

Time:    Presentation times will be agreed during tutorials and will be displayed during the lectures in term two.

Notes:    Referencing your work:

Referencing your work is a crucial part of a final year module so the following links have
been provided regarding the correct use of the new University referencing system APA 6th

Please note the APA 6th referencing system has replaced the Harvard system from
September 2013

http://hud.libguides.com/referencing/guides

http://www.hud.ac.uk/library/finding-info/apa-referencing/

BHA 0019 –    Presentation Descriptors
90 – 100    80 – 89    70 – 79    60 – 69    50 – 59    40 – 49    30 – 39    20 – 29    <20
Structure 5% including:-
Appropriate introduction, logical flow, adequate conclusion.
Superbly structured with clear logical progression through the topic and conclusion    Excellently structured with clear logical progression through the topic and conclusion    Excellent structure with clear logical progression through the topic    Very good structure with progression through the topic    Good structure with some progression through the topic    Average structure with little progression through the topic    Insufficient structure with little or no progression through the topic    Poor structure with no progression through the topic    Very poor structure with no progression through the topic
Content 20% considering:-
Just lecture based, evidence of own learning and criticality, current content supported with good examples, creativity?    Superbly presented and creative content which is used in a critical way throughout the presentation    Excellently presented and creative content used in a critical way throughout the presentation    Excellent content with evidence of critical analysis throughout the presentation    Very good content with evidence of analysis throughout the presentation    Good  content with some evidence of analysis during the presentation    Average content and occasional evidence of critical analysis during the presentation    Insufficient content with no real evidence of critical analysis during the presentation    Poor content with no evidence of critical analysis during the presentation    Extremely poor content with no evidence of critical analysis.
Demonstration of Understanding 25% including:-
Do the group really understand their material or is it just a surface approach
Superb demonstration of understand-ing by all members throughout the presentation    Understand-ing excellently demonstrated by all members throughout the presentation    Excellent demonstration of understanding by most members throughout the presentation    Very good demonstr-ation of understand-ing by most members throughout the presentation    Good  demonstr-ation of understand-ing by some members during the presentation    Understand-ing tended to be a surface approach by most members during the presentation    Insufficient understanding and clearly just a surface approach adopted during the presentation    Poor understanding of the materials discussed during the presentation    Little or no understand- ing demonstrated at all.
Use of Literature 5% :- Including
Are all data and sources fully acknowledged, does the material demonstrate depth, breadth and quality of research
Superb use of academic literature with both critical analysis and application throughout the presentation    Excellently used academic literature with both critical analysis and application throughout the presentation    Excellent use of academic literature with evidence of both critical analysis and application throughout the presentation.    Very good use of academic literature with evidence of both analysis and application throughout the presentation    Good use of academic literature with some evidence of both analysis and application during the presentation    Average use of academic literature with occasional evidence of  analysis and application during the presentation.    Insufficient use of academic literature with very little evidence of analysis and application.    Poor use of academic literature with no evidence of analysis and application.    Extremely poor use of academic literature with no evidence of analysis and application
Ability to answer questions 30% including :-
Confident, assured, comfortable with the material, all involved?

Questions dealt with superbly by all members of group and evidence of support to each other    Questions dealt with excellently by all members of group and evidence of support to each other    Questions dealt with very well by all members of group and evidence of support to each other    Questions dealt with very well by some members of group and evidence of support to each other    Questions dealt with adequately by some members of group some evidence of support to each other    Questions dealt with uncertainty by most members of group and little evidence of support to each other    Answers provided are mainly inadequate by most members of group with little evidence of group support     Inability to answer questions and little or no support within group    Inability to answer questions and no support within group
Overall Presentation 5% including :-
Consider the holistic viewpoint and experience (including slides).

Superb professional presentation with very clear evidence of having practiced    Excellent and professional presentation with very clear evidence of having practiced    Excellent presentation with clear evidence of having practiced    Very good  presentation with  evidence of having practiced    Good presentation but lacking professionalism with some evidence of having practiced    Average presentation that lacks professionalism and little evidence of having practiced    Inadequate presentation that lacks professionalism and no evidence of having practiced    Poor presentation lacking professionalism and no evidence of having practiced    Extremely poor presentation
Supporting documentation 10% including :-
Slides, personal development, does it add value to the presentation

Superb documents that add real value to the experience and demonstrates real personal development     Excellent documents that add real value to the experience and demonstrates real personal development    Excellent documents that add  value to the experience which shows real personal development    Very good documents that   real value to the experience with evidence of  personal development    Good documents that  add some value to the experience with some evidence of  personal development    Average documents that do not add  value to the experience with some evidence of  personal development    Inadequate documents that  fail to add  value to the experience with little evidence of  personal development    Poor documents that   add no value to the experience with little or no evidence of  personal development    No documents