Hypothesis 5: For a board of directors choosing a CEO, a transactional leader would be a bad hire.

Order Description

Each week every student will submit a paper of at least 2 full pages (double-spaced, APA formatted) in which they discuss a hypothesis that will be provided. The student will use the textbook, any assigned articles, plus at least three other academic sources to explain why the assigned hypothesis should be accepted or rejected.

Students should work on these projects without the assistance of classmates. The student should adopt a concise and succinct writing style for these assignments. The first paragraph should be a topic paragraph saying whether the hypothesis should by accepted or rejected. The rest of the two pages should be justification. These papers will have no room for “fluff” or opinion unsupported by academic literature. Must be peer reviewed sources and no older than twenty years. You can accept or reject this hypothesis based on your personal opinion. Make sure it states whether it is rejected or accepted in the first sentence at the start pf the paper. I will send you any information that you may need, please just contact me. The preferred sources are “The Academy of” or The Journal of” etc.

Hypothesis 5: For a board of directors choosing a CEO, a transactional leader would be a bad hire.

Order Description

Each week every student will submit a paper of at least 2 full pages (double-spaced, APA formatted) in which they discuss a hypothesis that will be provided. The student will use the textbook, any assigned articles, plus at least three other academic sources to explain why the assigned hypothesis should be accepted or rejected.

Students should work on these projects without the assistance of classmates. The student should adopt a concise and succinct writing style for these assignments. The first paragraph should be a topic paragraph saying whether the hypothesis should by accepted or rejected. The rest of the two pages should be justification. These papers will have no room for “fluff” or opinion unsupported by academic literature. Must be peer reviewed sources and no older than twenty years. You can accept or reject this hypothesis based on your personal opinion. Make sure it states whether it is rejected or accepted in the first sentence at the start pf the paper. I will send you any information that you may need, please just contact me. The preferred sources are “The Academy of” or The Journal of” etc.