How effective are strategies of coercive diplomacy in pursuing international security? Answer with reference to recent examples.

In the introduction you must write what example will be used in answering the question! Main body: In the theories of coercive diplomacy section, you need to provide a critical discussion and answer the main question which are these theories effective in achieving international security? How these theories can be effective? To what extend? Practical Aspects of Coercive Diplomacy In most cases and in most circumstances, coercive diplomacy is implemented by a group of nations who act as a bloc united by a common ideological inclination€¦ Are there any examples? The same applies for this section you need to be critical? Does these methods achieve international security and stability? Does compliance means automatically International security and stability? Despite the fact that these strategies might be effective, do they make the things better or worse? Does economic damage and halted development in a nation contributes to international security? However, in most situations, some aspects of coercive diplomacy does not take into account the features and aspects of the bigger picture. This is because in some nations in the developing world, pursuing coercive diplomacy leads to problems that isolate the ruling class who hardly feel the impact of these coercive processes and methodologies€¦ More discussion and in doing so critically answer the question! Also with the north korea example, you are not answering the question! Was coercive diplomacy effective in this case in achieving international security? Also with the Iran example, the fact that Iran came to an agreement with the USA was a result of coercive diplomacy? If so to what extent does it achieve international security and stability? The conclusion does not answer the question! You need to answer the question and be critical about it! It is not enough to present what is coercive diplomacy! You need to explore all the possibilities: (a) Does coercive diplomacy contributes to international security and stability? Yes why and how? (b) Even if coercive diplomacy strategies can be effective and achieve their aim does it necessary mean that they contribute to international security? The main problem with this essay is that it does not answer the question effectively and there is no critical discussion! It is not enough just to say what is coercive diplomacy and some examples! You need to answer the question with critical discussion and use examples to back up your argument! This is an international security essay and needs to answer the question from an international security perspective