Address all of the following questions to compose your reaction paper (600-800 words for the body of the paper):

How do the key assertions of Grande, Spring, and Hancock support Pinar’s discussions of “anti-intellectualism” and the need for a “complicated conversation”?  How do the approaches advocated by Posner & Rudnitsky, Jacobs (article & video), and Villegas & Lucas support arguments for a “complicated conversation” in curricula?

Support all of your positions throughout the reaction paper. An APA reference page must be included.

Use specific (APA) citations throughout your paper from all attachments. Be sure to run a spell check and grammar check before posting.