Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

how different phrasing of questions can influence eyewitness testimony.

In the Preview section for Chapter 17, we discussed a study by Loftus and Palmer (1974) examining how different phrasing of questions can influence eyewitness testimony. In the study, students watched a video of an automobile accident and then were questioned about what they had seen. One group of participants was asked to estimate the speed of the cars when they â€ÂÂœsmashed into” each other. Another group of was asked to estimate the speed of the cars when they â€ÂÂœhit” each other. Suppose that the actual speed of the cars was 22 miles per hour.

a. For the 50 people in the â€ÂÂœsmashed-into” group, assume that 32 overestimated the actual speed, 17 underestimated the speed, and 1 was exactly right. Is this result significantly different from what would be expected by chance? Use a two-tailed test with .05.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes