From the late Middle Ages through the Enlightenment and sometime after, mathematics was increasingly seen as a way to describe natural phenomenon precisely. Up to the end of the 19th century the universe was seen as mechanical, all of the observed, complex motion and forces seen in nature were thought to be deterministic. How does the modern, scientific world view differ?Discussion Question #1
Responses should be 300-500 words and include a citations. Use at least two sources of information to document your work.
From the late Middle Ages through the Enlightenment and sometime after, mathematics was increasingly seen as a way to describe natural phenomenon precisely. Up to the end of the 19th century the universe was seen as mechanical, all of the observed, complex motion and forces seen in nature were thought to be deterministic. How does the modern, scientific world view differ?
Discussion Question #2
What 20th-century developments in science and mathematics led to such a radical change in outlook on nature?
· Based on your readings and discussions during the course, do you think the level of prosperity of a given society influences the development of mathematics and scientific knowledge in that society? Provide examples of how these issues might be connected. Do you think that the prosperity enjoyed in the developed world endows a responsibility to share knowledge with developing nations?
Assignment
Create a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with presenter’s notes of a biography for your selected mathematician Leonardo da Vinci
Include the following information about the mathematician you chose for whichever assignment option you select:Leonardo da Vinci
Place of birth
Brief overview of family life and upbringing
Education
Countries in which he or she lived and worked
Specific examples of his or her contributions, not limited to mathematics
Most important work and results: What do you most remember the person for?
Place and cause of death, if known
Format any citations in your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.