Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

evaluation

To prepare for this assignment:

-Think about a public/non profit organization (Use the Final Project Organization)
-Select a program within that organization that would benefit from evaluation.
-Think about (a) research question(s) related to the purpose of the evaluation for the organization that is the subject of your Final Project.
-Consider a hypothesis or hypotheses related to the research question(s).

The assignment:

1. Briefly describe the organization that would benefit from evaluation that you will use for your Final Project.
2. Briefly describe the program within the organization that will benefit from evaluation.
3. Justify the selection of the program by explaining why it would benefit from evaluation.
4. Develop and explain a research question(s) related to the purpose of the evaluation.
5. Develop and explain a hypothesis or hypotheses related to the research question(s).

This website should help as one reference

https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~palmquis/courses/3971_ppt/research_quest

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Evaluation

Evaluation
Paper instructions:

The writer who takes this work will have to know (Owen 2006) and do an action research on this assessment.

There are 2 parts to this paper, Assessment 1 = Part A and Part B, which will need to be submitted on the 20th September..

I have to resubmit this paper…. and I want at least a Distinction….

Assessment (1)

Evaluation: Improvement and Accountability

Part A: Description of a Program
The task for this part of the assignment is to write a comprehensive
description of the program, project or activity (the unit of ‘evaluative
analysis’ or ‘evaluand’ (Owen, 2006) which is to be the object of the
evaluation you will be planning in this Unit. The description will include:
• The rationale for the program;
• Its purposes and intentions;
• The state of the program – planning, implementation or completed;
• Characteristic activities;
• Resources and materials;
• Methods of assessment (if relevant); and
• Dilemmas and issues that have emerged during its realisation.

Part B: Justification of an Approach to Evaluation
The task here is to review three (3) approaches to evaluation representing
at least two (2) forms (Owen, 2006, Chapter 3), and then to advance an
argument for adopting one approach for evaluating the ‘evaluand’ described
in Part A. Your argument should address such considerations as why this
particular approach is best suited to the ‘evaluand’ and its consistency with
conceptions of learning organisations as empowering workplaces for all
participating personnel.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Evaluation

Evaluation
Paper instructions:

The writer who takes this work will have to know (Owen 2006) and do an action research on this assessment.

There are 2 parts to this paper, Assessment 1 = Part A and Part B, which will need to be submitted on the 20th September..

I have to resubmit this paper…. and I want at least a Distinction….

Assessment (1)

Evaluation: Improvement and Accountability

Part A: Description of a Program
The task for this part of the assignment is to write a comprehensive
description of the program, project or activity (the unit of ‘evaluative
analysis’ or ‘evaluand’ (Owen, 2006) which is to be the object of the
evaluation you will be planning in this Unit. The description will include:
• The rationale for the program;
• Its purposes and intentions;
• The state of the program – planning, implementation or completed;
• Characteristic activities;
• Resources and materials;
• Methods of assessment (if relevant); and
• Dilemmas and issues that have emerged during its realisation.

Part B: Justification of an Approach to Evaluation
The task here is to review three (3) approaches to evaluation representing
at least two (2) forms (Owen, 2006, Chapter 3), and then to advance an
argument for adopting one approach for evaluating the ‘evaluand’ described
in Part A. Your argument should address such considerations as why this
particular approach is best suited to the ‘evaluand’ and its consistency with
conceptions of learning organisations as empowering workplaces for all
participating personnel.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes