do you have this book?
Disaster Capitalism: Making a Killing Out of Catastrophe, Loewenstein, Antony;

Important points to remember when writing your review:
• A review gives the reader a concise summary of the content. This includes a relevant description of the topic as well as its overall perspective, argument, or purpose.
• More importantly, a review offers a critical assessment of the content. This involves your reactions to the work under review: what strikes you as noteworthy, whether or not it was effective or persuasive, and how it enhanced your understanding of the issues at hand.
• Finally, in addition to analyzing the work, a review often suggests whether or not the audience would appreciate it.

1. Introduction: Introduce What’s Being Reviewed–
Begin your book review with a paragraph of introduction. Don’t give away too much of what your critical analysis will be in this section. Briefly introduce the book, the author, and maybe a few tidbits about when the book was released, etc. Mention the book’s theme. Sometimes you will need to include background to enable reader(s) to place the book into a specific context. For example,you might want to describe the general problem the book addresses or earlier work the author or others have done.

2. Summary of the Plot
Summarize the book’s content (no more than half the paper) by answering the following questions: (a) What is the topic? (b) How would you summarize the key arguments and the evidence for them? (c) Provide a summary of each chapter, Part, section, etc. (d) What does the author conclude? (d) how does this book relate to other scholarly works or literature?
3. Analysis and Conclusion

The last part of a book review should be the analysis of the book you are reviewing, and then the conclusion. You should analyze the book by answering the following questions: (a) Does the author make a persuasive case for her central point? (b) Is the evidence adequate? (c) What parts of the argument are most effective? Which are least effective? (d) What are the implications of this argument for understanding politics and economics and the nexus of the two?