icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Critical review

In six records of a life adrift, the writer focuses his attention on Chen Yun. She takes the simple things in life to be the ideal situation. She has a soft spot for painting and embroidering and takes them to be an important component of poetry (Fu, 2011). From the way She Fu treats her it’s clear that he feels that people in life should be able to share things like hobbies, and feelings unfortunately, the larger society does not seem to share similar ideas.

She believes good life is about enjoying the little pleasures of life. He enjoys things like cultivating flowers and composing poems (Fu, 2011). He fondly remembers his childhood and loves nature. He makes time to search for worldly possessions too. He displays great love for his wife and believes himself to be an upright and committed man. Unfortunately, he does not take good care of her. He does not believe in following what others believe in just for the sake of it.

Liu Dapeng, on the other hand, believed that good life was about getting good grades in school and landing a good government job. He believed in practicing Confucianism (Harrison, 2005). Unfortunately, he is so rigid that he practices it even when other people think it’s outdated. He is left as the only person who sticks to the old ways. He failed his exams and never achieved his dream of becoming a high official. He believed he was a scholar first and a merchant second. Just like She Fu, Liu was not doing well on the family front. He was not able to take care of his family financially.

She Fu and Liu Dapeng both seem to have the idea that for one to be successful in life, he must take academics seriously (Harrison, 2005). She loves composing poems with other scholars and has a lot of respect for customs and historical allusions. His life greatly depends on his scholarly circles. Liu Dapeng on the other hand, tried passing the passing the civil examination several times but failed. Despite this, he considers himself a scholar first. Both She Fu and Liu Dapeng are not able to take care of their families financially. They is despite the fact that they believe in the family institution. Their other believes get in the way of taking care of their families.

Work Cited

Henrietta, Harrison (2005). The Man Awakened From Dreams. California: Stanford University

Shen, Fu. (2011). Six Records of a Life Adrift. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Critical review

Critical review

Part 2 Final Report

You will receive formative feedback on the first report submission which then leads to a process of research into relevant areas of HR practice, in order to meet the key questions you have set in the diagnostic report. In your final submission your report will:

• provide a comprehensive and critical review of the relevant literature building upon the initial literature identified in the diagnostic report
• explain and discuss what answers this has provided to the key questions you identified in assignment 1: diagnostic report
• provide some recommendations for organisational improvement specific to the context.

You are not expected to provide detailed and implementable recommendations (with costs, timetables, for example) but should consider how this specific organisation or sector might address the issue, taking into account what you have learnt through your reading, and what you know about the organisational context.
The final report will be read in conjunction with your first submission by the same marker and so it is expected that you will have addressed the formative feedback given in the diagnostic within the final report.
This final submission is due to be submitted by 8th December 2015 and will account for 70% of the module grade. The report should be approximately 3,000 words.

In both reports it is important that you use relevant literature to provide evidence to support your arguments. This must be referenced correctly, using a standard format consistently throughout (Harvard), and a bibliography provided. Both the assignments should be presented in basic report style. This means in appropriate formal writing style, with contents page, sections and subsections, a clear introduction and conclusion etc. Some guidance on report style will be provided on Moodle.
Work which exceeds the suggested count by more than 10% will be penalised, but additional illustrative material that you include as appendices will not contribute to the word count.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Critical review

Critical review

Part 2 Final Report

You will receive formative feedback on the first report submission which then leads to a process of research into relevant areas of HR practice, in order to meet the key questions you have set in the diagnostic report. In your final submission your report will:

• provide a comprehensive and critical review of the relevant literature building upon the initial literature identified in the diagnostic report
• explain and discuss what answers this has provided to the key questions you identified in assignment 1: diagnostic report
• provide some recommendations for organisational improvement specific to the context.

You are not expected to provide detailed and implementable recommendations (with costs, timetables, for example) but should consider how this specific organisation or sector might address the issue, taking into account what you have learnt through your reading, and what you know about the organisational context.
The final report will be read in conjunction with your first submission by the same marker and so it is expected that you will have addressed the formative feedback given in the diagnostic within the final report.
This final submission is due to be submitted by 8th December 2015 and will account for 70% of the module grade. The report should be approximately 3,000 words.

In both reports it is important that you use relevant literature to provide evidence to support your arguments. This must be referenced correctly, using a standard format consistently throughout (Harvard), and a bibliography provided. Both the assignments should be presented in basic report style. This means in appropriate formal writing style, with contents page, sections and subsections, a clear introduction and conclusion etc. Some guidance on report style will be provided on Moodle.
Work which exceeds the suggested count by more than 10% will be penalised, but additional illustrative material that you include as appendices will not contribute to the word count.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes