Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

critical analysis

August 8th, 2017 admin

 

critical analysis

A critical analysis essay asks you to examine a selected text and develop a well-coherent
essay based on a specific topic. Therefore, choose one of the topics listed below and write
a 4 (full) pages, well-organized essay, and defend your thesis statement using the texts as
your source.
Distinguishing features:
Title:
The title of your essay should not be the title of the primary source but it should be a
creative, original and informative title.
Introduction:
Start your introduction by mentioning the author(s) and the text(s). Provide background
information about the topic or state the significance of the topic. Next, provide a well-
defined thesis stating clearly what you intend to argue in your essay. You may provide a
brief plot summary or relevant information about the author(s)/ time period) as your
background information. T
An arguable Thesis: Topic + Assertion (claim about the topic)
Beyond summary:
Your reader is already familiar with the text; the reader needs beyond the summary of the
text, gaining insight into what the text really mean and why. Therefore, in the body of
your essay, explore the parts of the reading that best illustrates or defend your thesis.
Make of sure to provide direct quotations or paraphrases from the text to support your
claim (follow MLA in-text citation). By doing so, you also need to explain the
significance of the quotations or paraphrases.
Keep in mind the elements of an argumentative essay:
0 Claim
0 Evidence
0 Explanation
0 closing
Conclusion:
In your concluding section, try to give your reader a sense of closure. Therefore, wrap up
your paper and restate your thesis, and avoid discussing any new topic in your
conclusion.
Sources:
For this essay you need to use the primary text; using secondary sources is options;
however, if you use them, make sure to cite the sources in the essay and works cited
page.

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Critical analysis

March 10th, 2016 admin

Topic: Critical analysis

Order Description
Below is the instruction on my assignment which is given to me by my lecturer:

A Critical analysis:

Reflects critically. That is, it asks serious, detailed, important and crucial questions about a topic in order to be analytical.
Evaluates what the writer is saying. It looks for the positive and negative elements, that is, the strengths and weaknesses in a writer’s views.
Asks questions about underlying assumptions (your own and the authors you read), including any controversies surrounding the topic.
Offers sound reasons as to why one might accept a position or disagree with it.

Please watch: ‘Critical Thinking’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OLPL5p0fMg

Structure of a Critical Analysis:
1. Introduction – states the work to be analyzed and includes a brief statement that summarizes your overall evaluation of the work to be critiqued, that is your
argument.

2. Critical Analysis – summarizes and questions the key points the author is making, drawing out a strength (one point you agree with) and a weakness (one point you
disagree with) in their position.

3. Conclusion – restate your evaluation of the author’s ideas as your argument.
Please choose one option:

1. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations with Indonesia. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at least one
idea that you disagree with from the article by Howard Dick, 2015, ‘Turnbull Meets Jokowi: A New Chapter in Australia-Indonesia Relations?’ E-International Relations.

The Asia-Pacific Scramble and a ‘Larger Australia’


Include in your references the article and at least two other academic references

2. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations with China. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at least one
idea that you disagree with from the article by Kerry Brown and Hannah Bretherton, 2016, ‘Australian Relations with China and the USA: the challenge of grand
strategies’ Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(1): 1-5.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2015.1103700?journalCode=caji20
Include in your references the article in at least two other academic references

3. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations in the Asia-Pacific. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at
least one idea that you disagree with from the article by Strobe Driver, 2015, ‘The Asia-Pacific Scramble and a “Larger Australia”’, E-International Relations.

Turnbull Meets Jokowi: A New Chapter in Australia-Indonesia Relations?

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Critical analysis

March 10th, 2016 admin

Topic: Critical analysis

Order Description
Below is the instruction on my assignment which is given to me by my lecturer:

A Critical analysis:

Reflects critically. That is, it asks serious, detailed, important and crucial questions about a topic in order to be analytical.
Evaluates what the writer is saying. It looks for the positive and negative elements, that is, the strengths and weaknesses in a writer’s views.
Asks questions about underlying assumptions (your own and the authors you read), including any controversies surrounding the topic.
Offers sound reasons as to why one might accept a position or disagree with it.

Please watch: ‘Critical Thinking’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OLPL5p0fMg

Structure of a Critical Analysis:
1. Introduction – states the work to be analyzed and includes a brief statement that summarizes your overall evaluation of the work to be critiqued, that is your
argument.

2. Critical Analysis – summarizes and questions the key points the author is making, drawing out a strength (one point you agree with) and a weakness (one point you
disagree with) in their position.

3. Conclusion – restate your evaluation of the author’s ideas as your argument.
Please choose one option:

1. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations with Indonesia. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at least one
idea that you disagree with from the article by Howard Dick, 2015, ‘Turnbull Meets Jokowi: A New Chapter in Australia-Indonesia Relations?’ E-International Relations.

The Asia-Pacific Scramble and a ‘Larger Australia’


Include in your references the article and at least two other academic references

2. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations with China. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at least one
idea that you disagree with from the article by Kerry Brown and Hannah Bretherton, 2016, ‘Australian Relations with China and the USA: the challenge of grand
strategies’ Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(1): 1-5.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2015.1103700?journalCode=caji20
Include in your references the article in at least two other academic references

3. Critically analyze the claim that Australia has good international relations in the Asia-Pacific. To do so, choose at least one idea that you agree with and at
least one idea that you disagree with from the article by Strobe Driver, 2015, ‘The Asia-Pacific Scramble and a “Larger Australia”’, E-International Relations.

Turnbull Meets Jokowi: A New Chapter in Australia-Indonesia Relations?

Posted in Uncategorized
«
»
Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

  • FREE FEATURES

    Free revisions

    Free title page

    Free Bibliography and Reference Pages

    Free Formatting (APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard and Others)

  • WE ACCEPT

    paypal
Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes