Concept Analysis
DescriptionNeed paper analyzing the Concept of Quality of Life as applied to my original Phenomenon of Interest, hypertension. The Concept Analysis paper on Quality of Life is attached as well as the rubric and instructions for the title page.Summary Despite quality of life (QOL) being a commonly-used concept, it is often
not clearly defined or understood. This paper analyzes the concept of quality of life
using the framework developed by Walker and Avant [Strategies for Theory Construction
in Nursing, 3rd Edition, Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, 1995]. A literature
review examines the current usage of the concept and the concepts critical attributes.
In keeping with Walker and Avants framework, cases will be described which
further define and illustrate the concept based on the presence or absence of the
critical attributes. In closing, the concepts antecedents, consequences, and empirical
referents will be explored. The concept of QOL is particularly significant for
orthopaedic nurses. By examining QOL, nurses can become more cognizant of the
concept, patients perceptions of their own QOL, and ultimately the positive role
that nurses can play.
c 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All
Concept Analysis Paper Grading Rubric
NU 607
Student:
Grading criteria
Points
Select a concept analysis from the peer reviewed nursing literature that has relevance to the previously selected Phenomenon of Interest (POI)
/2
Introduction: identify your selected Phenomenon of Interest. The introduction should end with a thesis statements that tells the reader what will be discussed in the paper.
/1
Summarize the following key points from the Concept Analysis: What was the authors purpose for conducting the analysis? What were the critical attributes assigned to the concept in the article? What were the stated implications for nursing practice resulting from the analysis done by the author? Be sure to reference this section to the Concept Analysis article chosen for this assignment.
/5
Explain your choice of the Concept Analysis. Why was this particular Concept Analysis chosen? What is the relevance of the concept to your POI or your practice? Support this section with peer reviewed references
/5
Discuss how the Concept Analysis impacts the way you view your POI. Does the Concept Analysis provide any new insight into the POI? Did reviewing the Concept Analysis help to clarify any aspects of the POI? Did the Concept Analysis make you view the POI in a different way?
/5
Conclusion: This should summarize the content presented in your paper. No new information should be included in this section.
/1
A PDF copy of the Concept Analysis article is merged at the end of paper. The file upload should be a single PDF document including the paper, the Turnitin report, then the article.
/1
Total points
/20
Deductions:
Final score:
/20
The paper should be written in a formal, scholarly style. Correct APA format is required. The paper should be between 6-8 pages in length (excluding the Title and Reference pages)
For submission: each paper should be named according to the File naming policy of the course: see Lessons section for instructions on how to do this appropriately
Submission instruction: each paper should be submitted in PDF format to the appropriate category of Assignments section.
Up to 20% of the total points for this assignment may be deducted for an overall lack of scholarship to include:
o APA errors
o Grammatical errors
o Incorrect spelling
o Over the page limit
Concept Analysis
Leave a Reply
Concept Analysis
Description of the Assignment
This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.
Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.
Criteria for Content
1. Introduction
The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:
• Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
• Identifies the selected nursing concept,
• Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
• Names the sections of the paper.
2. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept
This section includes:
• Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
• Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
3. Concept comparison
This section includes a substantive description of the:
• The concept from the perspective of a non-nursing profession with scholarly support from the selected non-nursing profession.
• Explains the similarities for the selected concept between the nursing and selected non-nursing profession.
• Explains the differences for the selected concept between the nursing and selected non-nursing profession.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
4. Literature review
This section requires:
• A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
• Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
Support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.
5. Defining attributes
For this section:
• A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
6. Antecedent and Consequence
This section requires the identification of:
• 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
• 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
7. Empirical Referents
This section requires the identification of:
• 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.
8. Model Cases
1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
• Definition,
• All identified attributes,
• Antecedent,
• Consequence, and
• Empirical referent or Measurement
Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment.
9. Alternative Cases
This section requires:
• The identification of 2 (two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:
• Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.
• Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)
Applies information from selected nursing theory.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case. For this assignment, two alternative cases are required. These are:
• Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
• Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.
10. Conclusion
This section requires:
• Summarization of key information regarding:
o Selected nursing concept,
o Selected nursing theory, and
o Concept analysis findings.
• The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained about applying nursing theory to a professional issue or concern.
Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing (borrowed) theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
• Behavioral system
• Boundary lines
• Caring
• Cleanliness of environment
• Empowerment
• Homeostasis
• Noise
• Open system
• Palliative care
• Patient Assessment
• Patient Centered Care
• Resources
• Self-care
• Self-care deficit • Activities of living
• Actual caring occasion
• Adaptation
• Comfort
• Compassion
• Engagement
• Leadership
• Meaningfulness
• Modeling
• Nursing intuition
• Pain
• Pattern
• Transaction
Scholary resources must be from 2010 to present
Concept Analysis
Description of the Assignment
This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.
Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.
Criteria for Content
1. Introduction
The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:
• Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
• Identifies the selected nursing concept,
• Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
• Names the sections of the paper.
2. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept
This section includes:
• Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
• Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
3. Concept comparison
This section includes a substantive description of the:
• The concept from the perspective of a non-nursing profession with scholarly support from the selected non-nursing profession.
• Explains the similarities for the selected concept between the nursing and selected non-nursing profession.
• Explains the differences for the selected concept between the nursing and selected non-nursing profession.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
4. Literature review
This section requires:
• A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
• Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
Support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.
5. Defining attributes
For this section:
• A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
A substantive discussion of this section with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
6. Antecedent and Consequence
This section requires the identification of:
• 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
• 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
7. Empirical Referents
This section requires the identification of:
• 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.
8. Model Cases
1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
• Definition,
• All identified attributes,
• Antecedent,
• Consequence, and
• Empirical referent or Measurement
Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment.
9. Alternative Cases
This section requires:
• The identification of 2 (two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:
• Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.
• Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)
Applies information from selected nursing theory.
A substantive discussion of the element with support from scholarly nursing literature is required.
Explanation: Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case. For this assignment, two alternative cases are required. These are:
• Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
• Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.
10. Conclusion
This section requires:
• Summarization of key information regarding:
o Selected nursing concept,
o Selected nursing theory, and
o Concept analysis findings.
• The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained about applying nursing theory to a professional issue or concern.
Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing (borrowed) theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
• Behavioral system
• Boundary lines
• Caring
• Cleanliness of environment
• Empowerment
• Homeostasis
• Noise
• Open system
• Palliative care
• Patient Assessment
• Patient Centered Care
• Resources
• Self-care
• Self-care deficit • Activities of living
• Actual caring occasion
• Adaptation
• Comfort
• Compassion
• Engagement
• Leadership
• Meaningfulness
• Modeling
• Nursing intuition
• Pain
• Pattern
• Transaction
Scholary resources must be from 2010 to present