Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

Summarize legislative crime control efforts pertaining to gun control and assessing the concepts strengths and weaknesses, and to ultimately perform a value judgment.
Please read order details and paper instructions carefully.

Paper instructions:
In this paper, you are being asked to summarize legislative crime control efforts pertaining to gun control.  You are being asked to assess the concepts strengths

and weaknesses, and to ultimately perform a value judgment. Your paper should be at least 2 pages, and at most 4 pages, in length. The page requirement is for actual

content, meaning your own writing. A cover page and/or bibliography should not be counted towards your page requirement. Your paper is expected to be typed in 12 point

– Times New Roman font. Further, your paper should have 1-inch margins, be double spaced, and submitted as a Microsoft Word document.  Any assignment that is found to

be plagiarized will automatically receive a zero.  PLEASE refrain from using Wikipedia as a scholarly reference in this class.

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror

Please read order details and paper instructions carefully.

Paper instructions:
Write an essay about the right of habeas corpus in the context of the war on terror. Your essay should address the following subtopics:
Explain the historical evolution of habeas corpus, including its English and American traditions. The explanation of its evolution within the American tradition

should include the general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution and its relationship to the protection of other civil liberties.
Provide examples from U.S. history of the suspension of habeas corpus and their applicability to the present.
Analyze the relevance of habeas corpus to the contemporary U.S. situation during the war on terror, especially with respect to persons characterized by as enemy

combatants or illegal combatants.
Explain the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the right of habeas corpus with respect to enemy combatants or illegal combatants (i.e., the views of the five

justices making up the majority in Boumediene v. Bush as well as the views of the four dissenting justices).
Evaluate a minimum of four perspectives on this topic expressed by justices of the Supreme Court, leaders in other branches of government, and commentators in both

the academic and popular media. Your evaluation should consider perspectives on the following topics as they relate to habeas corpus:
The role of the President as Commander-in-Chief.
The role of Congress in determining when habeas corpus can be suspended.
The role of the Supreme Court in protecting civil liberties, including the judicial philosophy which should guide the Court in this role, and
In your evaluation, you should also include your personal philosophy, values, or ideology about the balance between civil liberties and national security in the

context of an unending war on terror.