chose on mega event examine why it was created and if the original vision is reflected in the event today
Order Description
Examine the growth of one of the following Mega or Major events since it has been founded. Examine why it was created and if the original vision is reflected in the event today and critically discuss issues that have arisen with the planning and delivery of the event because of its increasing size, complexity and legacy goals.
Events to be considered; (4 choose 1)
– Olympics (modern era)
– Hajj – the Islamic annual pilgrimage
– FIFA World Cup
– Glastonbury Music Festival
Task Brief 2 – Coursework
? Task Details:
Examine the growth of one of the following Mega or Major events since it has been founded. Examine why it was created and if the original vision is reflected in the event today and critically discuss issues that have arisen with the planning and delivery of the event because of its increasing size, complexity and legacy goals.
? Events to be considered;
– Olympics (modern era)
– Hajj – the Islamic annual pilgrimage
– FIFA World Cup
– Glastonbury Music Festival
Particular instructions to students:
Word limit: 2500 words +/- 10%
Style: Report
? Weighted Assessment Criteria:
The task is graded against the following criteria:
(25%) Breadth of knowledge of the chosen event
(25%) Evaluating real-life examples and evaluating and contextualising them in-line with chosen question
(25%) Level of critical analysis and evaluation applied in explanation of subject area
(10%) Evidence of reading/research
(10%) Quality and accuracy of language, structure
(5%) Accuracy of referencing and reference list
? Study Skills Support
Essay & Report writing skills are reviewed in class and guidance given on structuring the report. Support will also be provided in scheduled individual consultations.
? Mark Grid
a) Breadth of knowledge of chosen event – 25%
b) Evaluating real-life examples and evaluating and contextualising them in-line with chosen question – 25%
c) Level of critical analysis and evaluation applied in explanation of subject area – 25%
d) Evidence of reading/research
e) Quality and accuracy of language, structure and technical features – 10%