Case Study/Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh flowers, Flowers. Inc

Order Description
Before you start:
1. Carefully review the instructions and information below.
2. If you prefer to print the assignment, right click on this block of text, and choose This Frame/ Print Frame.
3. Prepare and save your response using a word-processing program, such as Microsoft Word. Save it to your computer in a place where you will be able to find it again.
4. Attach your document using the Browse My Computer button.
5. This Case Study is worth 170 points toward your total points.
Important Guidelines:
1. Your score will be determined using the Critical Legal Thinking Case Rubric. Please read this rubric thoroughly BEFORE attempting this assignment. You should also consult the Critical Legal Thinking “How-to” rubric and the example case in the Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignments of the Syllabus.
2. Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive content. Your analysis and solutions must be based on the principles of law, ethics, and business – not on your opinions. You MUST describe how application of the principles to the key facts support your determination of the issues, in other words, you need to show the reasoning behind your decision.
3. Key facts are those facts that determine if the principles of law are met. You must demonstrate that you recognize the key facts in this case. List the key facts individually. Do NOT simply repeat or retype the factual scenario.
4. The length of your response has no bearing on your score. There is no minimum or limit, however most responses will be between two and three substantial pages.
5. Your assignment must be prepared using APA format. See the Tools and Resources page for more information about APA styling.
Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh flowers, Flowers. Inc. In order to accommodate one of the company’s best customers, Ron offers to immediately rush a delivery of fresh peonies. All of the delivery trucks are currently out on delivery. Ron directs an employee, Ruth, to use her own vehicle to deliver the flowers.
Ruth carelessly parks her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolls down the hill, knocking down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignite a grass fire. The fire spreads until it reaches a gasoline station one mile away. There is a tanker truck off-loading gasoline to the station’s gas tanks. The fire ignites the gasoline being pumped into the tanks, and one of the tanks explodes, causing part of the station structure to fall on and injure a passing motorist, Jim.
1. Can Jim recover damages from Ruth; from Flowers’ Inc? Why or why not?
2. Identify the cause of action. Discuss each element of the cause of action, and relate them to your assessment of whether Jim has a cause of action against Ruth.
3. Discuss the legal doctrine under which Jim might also recover from Flowers, Inc.

Case Study/Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh flowers, Flowers. Inc

Order Description
Before you start:
1. Carefully review the instructions and information below.
2. If you prefer to print the assignment, right click on this block of text, and choose This Frame/ Print Frame.
3. Prepare and save your response using a word-processing program, such as Microsoft Word. Save it to your computer in a place where you will be able to find it again.
4. Attach your document using the Browse My Computer button.
5. This Case Study is worth 170 points toward your total points.
Important Guidelines:
1. Your score will be determined using the Critical Legal Thinking Case Rubric. Please read this rubric thoroughly BEFORE attempting this assignment. You should also consult the Critical Legal Thinking “How-to” rubric and the example case in the Critical Legal Thinking Case Assignments of the Syllabus.
2. Your score will be determined by evaluation of your substantive content. Your analysis and solutions must be based on the principles of law, ethics, and business – not on your opinions. You MUST describe how application of the principles to the key facts support your determination of the issues, in other words, you need to show the reasoning behind your decision.
3. Key facts are those facts that determine if the principles of law are met. You must demonstrate that you recognize the key facts in this case. List the key facts individually. Do NOT simply repeat or retype the factual scenario.
4. The length of your response has no bearing on your score. There is no minimum or limit, however most responses will be between two and three substantial pages.
5. Your assignment must be prepared using APA format. See the Tools and Resources page for more information about APA styling.
Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh flowers, Flowers. Inc. In order to accommodate one of the company’s best customers, Ron offers to immediately rush a delivery of fresh peonies. All of the delivery trucks are currently out on delivery. Ron directs an employee, Ruth, to use her own vehicle to deliver the flowers.
Ruth carelessly parks her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolls down the hill, knocking down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignite a grass fire. The fire spreads until it reaches a gasoline station one mile away. There is a tanker truck off-loading gasoline to the station’s gas tanks. The fire ignites the gasoline being pumped into the tanks, and one of the tanks explodes, causing part of the station structure to fall on and injure a passing motorist, Jim.
1. Can Jim recover damages from Ruth; from Flowers’ Inc? Why or why not?
2. Identify the cause of action. Discuss each element of the cause of action, and relate them to your assessment of whether Jim has a cause of action against Ruth.
3. Discuss the legal doctrine under which Jim might also recover from Flowers, Inc.