Cardiac Heart Disease and Self Care In Women

Order Description
This week the discussion focuses on creating a Synthesis Table(s) as a means to summarize and organize the body of evidence from the Evaluation Table.
1. Share your approach to synthesizing the evidence. What were the variables of interest you identified?

2. Summarize 2 articles you have identified from the Synthesis Table as pertinent to your proposal. Include:
• the level of evidence,
• study design,
• evidence of rigor.
(Use appropriate APA citation in text and references)

3. In addition to research studies, patient preference and clinical expertise should also be considered. Discuss how you will incorporate these important perspectives into your project proposal.
NOTE: Synthesis Table Exemplar and Template will be provided.

Evaluation Table with the articles to be used for this research paper will be provided as well.

Topic: Cardiac Heart Disease and Self Care in Women

Order Description
FIRST:
1. Select two (2) “keeper” studies and Summarize these “keeper” studies following the evaluation table template.
2. Summarize the synthesis of the body of evidence
3. Turn in the search tracker to demonstrate the steps you took to locate the evidence.
SECOND:
1. Discuss your experience completing the rapid critical appraisal process. Was it really “rapid” or was it more of a laborious process?
2. Did reading the abstract help you make quick decisions about including or excluding the study?
3. What worked best for you in terms of the approach you decided to use to complete the appraisal and Evaluation Table? What didn’t work?

PAPER WILL BE BASED ON STUDY THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED BY ME. I WILL ALSO PROVIDE THE EVALUATION TABLE AND SEACH TRACKER TEMPLATE AS WELL AS THE RAPID CRITICAL APPRAISSAL PROCESS GUIDELINES. THANK YOU.

Topic: Cardiac Heart Disease and Self Care in Women

Order Description
FIRST:
1. Select two (2) “keeper” studies and Summarize these “keeper” studies following the evaluation table template.
2. Summarize the synthesis of the body of evidence
3. Turn in the search tracker to demonstrate the steps you took to locate the evidence.
SECOND:
1. Discuss your experience completing the rapid critical appraisal process. Was it really “rapid” or was it more of a laborious process?
2. Did reading the abstract help you make quick decisions about including or excluding the study?
3. What worked best for you in terms of the approach you decided to use to complete the appraisal and Evaluation Table? What didn’t work?

PAPER WILL BE BASED ON STUDY THAT WILL BE SUBMITTED BY ME. I WILL ALSO PROVIDE THE EVALUATION TABLE AND SEACH TRACKER TEMPLATE AS WELL AS THE RAPID CRITICAL APPRAISSAL PROCESS GUIDELINES. THANK YOU.