business skills
(Module Code: MOD003325)
Final Assignment
September 2015 cohort
Further Information:
- Word Limit: 3,000 (see individual tasks for word limits)
You must indicate the word count for your submission on the front page. Written assignments must fall within a 10% range of the limit for each section. Your assignment must not be shorter than 2,700 words and not longer than 3,300 words.
- Submission Date:
This assignment must be received by no later than the date and time stated above. Work cannot be uploaded on Turnitin after the stated date and will receive a mark of zero (unless an extension has been approved in advance of the deadline).
- Extensions
Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness or other cause considered valid by the Student Adviser. These must normally be received and agreed by the Student Adviser in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline. Please refer to the Academic Regulations or your Student Handbook for full details.
NOTE:
YOU MUST SUBMIT YOUR ASSIGNMENT USING TURNITIN SOFTWARE
Module Title: Business Skills | Module Code MOD003325 | |
Academic Year: 2015/2016 | Level: 4 | |
Assessment Number: 1 (interim) | Semester: 2 | |
Module Leader: Sanja Lalic | Weighting: 60% | |
Type of Assessments: Assignment | Total Word Limit: 3,000 | |
Assessed Learning Outcomes: 1 and 2 | Additional Guidance:You must complete all tasks and submit your responses in a single document, marked with your student identification (SID) number(s) and indicating the word count.
You must provide references where appropriate, following Harvard style, and include a bibliography. |
|
Please note that this is an individual piece of work and collusion is not tolerated. This means that all tasks must be written by you individually without assistance.
Task A: Report, 1250 words
Having delivered your presentation to Norling PLC, your Human Resources department have asked you to write a report that details your findings.
The report should have the title:
Investment Opportunities in E-Sports for Norling PLC
The report must follow a standard business report format, be professionally presented and include the following sections:
- Cover Page
- Executive Summary (approx. 100 words)
- Table of Contents
- Introduction (approx.100-200 words)
- Findings and Analysis (approx. 750 words)
- Conclusion (approx. 150-250 words)
- Reference List/Bibliography
- Appendices (only if required, this section is optional)
Key areas to cover in the Findings/Analysis section are:
- What are E-Sports?
- What is the international picture of the industry like?
- What are the money making opportunities like in relation to the creation of an E-Sports team?
- What are the potential costs involved in creating a team?
- What are the potential risks of investing in this type of opportunity?
- Do you advise on investing in the creation of a team? If so, you will need to give details of the type of team that should be created and reasons why. If not, then you must give a valid explanation of your reasoning.
Your appendices should include:
- Any charts or statistical data that you wish to include. Use a screen shot or the Snipping Tool to incorporate this into your work if you use Excel or similar.
- Potential start-up calculations shown on a spreadsheet. Use a screen shot or the Snipping Tool to incorporate this into your work.
Task B: Presentation Reflection, 500 words
The HR Manager at Norling PLC has asked you to discuss the challenges faced in working together with other team members on building a presentation.
Write a brief 500 word reflection for the HR Manager under the following headings:
- Division of Labour
- Team Working Skills
- Organisation
- Delivery
In each section, describe the processes used and detail the difficulties or challenges that you feel that you faced in completing the project.
Task C: Critical Essay, 1250 words
Using a standard essay format, write an essay on the following topic:
“Violence sells, but at what cost? Discuss whether violence in video games can be
shown to have an adverse effect on users.”
- You must conduct suitable research using the reading list that your tutor will provide you with. The reading list will be available on the MyARUL site.
- You must explain various arguments presented and analyse them using critical thinking skills practiced in the module
- You must use Harvard referencing and provide a Bibliography listing the sources you have used
- As this is an essay you should not use any subheadings
Marking Criteria
All tasks should be marked out of 100 separately and then the marks will receive the following weighting:
Task A: 40%
Task B: 20%
Task C: 40%
A spreadsheet will be provided to markers to automatically perform the calculations.
Each piece of work should exhibit qualities as below:
30-39% | • The overall message is hard to follow or may lack focus.• The point of the exercise has been missed
• Ideas are not developed beyond basic restatements. • The work is lacking in organisation at any level • Use of source materials is extremely limited or extremely excessive use of direct quotations • Little or no understanding of Harvard referencing • Grammar and vocabulary errors make comprehension extremely difficult |
40-49% | • The overall message is poorly developed or may deviate significantly• Ideas are poorly developed with little analysis
• The organisation of paragraphs or sections does not help the reader’s understanding • Use of source materials is limited or excessive use of direct quotations • Poor understanding of Harvard referencing; inconsistencies and errors • Grammar and vocabulary errors cause strain to the reader |
50-59% | • The overall message can be followed but is not always clear or fluent• Ideas begin to develop but lack critical insight
• The work is organised to a basic structure but may lack cohesion • Adequate use of source material • Adequate use of Harvard referencing • Grammar and vocabulary errors exist but do not cause strain • A technical and academic vocabulary can be seen emerging |
60-69% | • The overall message is clear• Ideas begin to develop and critical analysis is applied
• The work is well structured, which aids the reader’s comprehension • Good use of source material and source analysis • Accurate use of Harvard referencing • No notable grammar errors, low frequency vocabulary used effectively • A technical and academic vocabulary is demonstrated |
70%+ | • The overall message proliferates throughout and is clearly identifiable• Ideas are adeptly developed and argued
• The structure of the work helps to deliver the overall point being made • Excellent use of numerous sources, which are analysed • Flawless use of Harvard referencing • No grammar or punctuation errors • A broad technical and academic vocabulary is used to provide accuracy |
Need assistance with this?