icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Business Law;

Business Law;

Mr Manfredi recently purchased a vegetarian cafe from HappyHippie Pty Ltd on the faith of representations made to him by HappyHippie
director, Elvis Eggp ant regarding the past and future profita ility ofthe cafe.

The historical figures, in the form of a historical

account, presented to Mr Manfredi were inflated by 60%, and amounted to nothing more than a series of numbers “made up” by Elvis
Eggplant. These were designed to induce Mr Manfredi to purchase the cafe.

hen setting up his new cafe, Mr Manfredi discovered some old

receipts and cash registertapes. He also discovered some old tax documents. On inspection, Mr Manfredi discoversthatthe figures put to
him by Mr Eggplant were false.

Mr Manfredi has come to you for advice which you must base on legislation and/or common law.

Your

assignment must be written in the third person, in the form of a legal essay. The maximum length of your essay is 1500 words, +/- 10%.
Referencing must be in accordance with the AGLC3, which can be found on the library website. Penalties may be imposed if you incorrectly
reference. he assignment must also contain a bibliography.

Plagiarism is not acceptable and will be reported. Assignments are to be

submitted through URKUND for checking before final submissions through Moodle. The assignment is an individual piece of assessment, no

rou work.

llencpourage you to look at the examples of good and bad essays on Moodle.

Your assignment is due at 5pm Friday of week 8 -3

October2014. Penaltiesfor late submissions will apply. Please see the unit outline for submission requirements, including the requirement
to submit a hard copy.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Business Law

Erma, a merchant, receives a brochure from Ammco regarding some merchandise that is sold in Erma’s business. Erma then sends in a purchase order ordering 25 units of merchandise (which exceeds $500.00 in value). Ammco upon receipt of the order, sends a letter of confirmation containing additional information which states that the price did not include shipping and insurance costs and that the shipping costs and insurance would be added on to the total contract price. Furthermore, Ammo delegates the obligation of shipping the merchandise to Ecco. While the goods were in transit, the truck was hijacked and all the merchandise, including Erma’s order. Applying “common law contract principles” are there Party issues? Formation issues? Proof issues? Performance issues? Breach and Discharge issues? What are the available remedies?

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes