Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

business economic

Attempt ALL questions

A. Assume that you are a member of the Bank of Japan (BoJ) Board of Governors in 1998. The president of BoJannounces that he is thinking of applying Quantitative Easing (QE).

1) In your view, what could be the reasons behind this decision? ??
2) What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of QE? Discuss critically.
B. Assume that the Minister of Finance is responsible for fiscal policy and the Central Banker is responsible for monetary policy. Each policy maker has two choices; either to follow a contractionary (tight) or an expansionary (easy) policy.

In 2005, the choices were as described in Table A (with the numbers within the matrix showing the payoffs to each policy maker):

Table A-2005
Minister of Finance

Tight easy

tight 3, 1 0, 2
easy 1, 1 2, 3
In 2010, the choices were as described in Table B:
Table B-2010
Minister of Finance

Tight easy
tight 3, 1 0, 2
easy 1,1 2,3

1) What is/are the Nash equilibria in each year? Explain your answers. ?

2) Assume that you are a Government Advisor and you are asked to give a policy report. What will you write in such a report regarding the tools for the chosen policy combination in each year? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the policy tools in each case. ???????????

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

business economic

Attempt ALL questions

A. Assume that you are a member of the Bank of Japan (BoJ) Board of Governors in 1998. The president of BoJannounces that he is thinking of applying Quantitative Easing (QE).

1) In your view, what could be the reasons behind this decision? ??
2) What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of QE? Discuss critically.
B. Assume that the Minister of Finance is responsible for fiscal policy and the Central Banker is responsible for monetary policy. Each policy maker has two choices; either to follow a contractionary (tight) or an expansionary (easy) policy.

In 2005, the choices were as described in Table A (with the numbers within the matrix showing the payoffs to each policy maker):

Table A-2005
Minister of Finance

Tight easy

tight 3, 1 0, 2
easy 1, 1 2, 3
In 2010, the choices were as described in Table B:
Table B-2010
Minister of Finance

Tight easy
tight 3, 1 0, 2
easy 1,1 2,3

1) What is/are the Nash equilibria in each year? Explain your answers. ?

2) Assume that you are a Government Advisor and you are asked to give a policy report. What will you write in such a report regarding the tools for the chosen policy combination in each year? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the policy tools in each case. ???????????

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes