Week 3 – Case Study (Chapter 10)

Assessment of Exchange Rate Exposure

Blades Inc., is currently exporting roller blades to Thailand and importing certain components needed to manufacture roller blades from that country. Under a fixed contractual agreement, Blade’s primary customer in Thailand has committed itself to purchase 180,000 pairs of roller blades annually at a fixed price of 4,594 Thai baht (THB) per pair. Blades is importing rubber and plastic components from various suppliers in Thailand at a cost of approximately THB 2,871 per pair, although the exact price (in baht) depends on current market prices. Blades imports materials sufficient to manufacture 72,000 pairs of roller blades from Thailand each year. The decision to import materials from Thailand was reached because rubber and plastic components needed to manufacture Blades’ products are inexpensive, yet of high quality, in Thailand.

Blades has also conducted business with a Japanese supplier in the past. Although Blades’ analysis indicates that the Japanese components are of a lower quality than the Thai components. Blades has occasionally imported components from Japan when the prices were low enough. Currently, Ben Holt, Blades’ chief financial officer (CFO), is considering importing components from Japan more frequently. Specifically, he would like to reduce Blades’ baht exposure by taking advantage of the recently high correlation between the baht and the yen. Since Blades has net inflows denominated in baht and would have outflows denominated in yen, its net transaction exposure would be reduced if these two currencies were highly correlated. If Blades decides two currencies were highly correlated. If Blades decides to import components from Japan, it would probably import materials sufficient to manufacture 1,700 pairs of roller blades annually at a price of 7,440 yen per pair.

Holt is also contemplating further expansion into foreign countries. Although he would eventually like to establish a subsidiary or acquire an existing business overseas, his immediate focus is on increasing Blades’ foreign sales. Holt’s primary reason for this plan is that the profit margin from Blades’ imports and exports exceeds 25 percent, while the profit margin from Blades’ domestic production is below 15 percent. Consequently, he believes that further foreign expansion will be beneficial to the company’s future.

Though Blades’ current exporting and importing practices have been profitable, Holt is contemplating extending Blades’ trade relationships to countries in different regions of the world. One reason for this decision is that various Thai roller blade manufacturers have recently established subsidiaries in the United States. Furthermore, various Thai roller blade manufacturers have recently targeted the U.S. market by advertising their products over the Internet. As a result of this increased competition from Thailand, Blades is uncertain whether its primary customer in Thailand will renew the current commitment to purchase a fixed number of roller blades annually. The current agreement will terminate in three years. Another reason for engaging in transactions with other, non-Asian countries is that the Thai baht has depreciated substantially recently, which has somewhat reduced Blades’ profit margins. The sale of roller blades to other countries with more stable currencies may increase Blades’ profit margins.

While Blades will continue exporting to Thailand under the current agreement for the next 2 years, it may also export roller blades to Jogs, LTD., a British retailer. Preliminary negotiations indicate that Jogs would be willing to commit itself to purchase 200,000 pairs of Speedos, Blades’ primary product, for a fixed price of £80 per pair.

Holt is aware that further expansion would increase Blades’ exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, but he believes that Blades can supplement its profit margins by expanding. He is vaguely familiar with the different types of exchange rate exposure but has asked you, a financial analyst at Blades Inc., to help him assess how the contemplated changes would affect Blades’ financial position. Among other concerns, Holt is aware that recent economic problems in the region have had an effect on Thailand and on other Asian countries. Although the correlation between Asian currencies such as the Japanese yen and the Thai baht is generally not very high and very unstable, these recent problems have increased the correlation among most Asian currencies. In contrast, the correlation between the British pound and the Asian currencies is quite low.

To aid you in your analysis, Holt has provided you with the following data:
CURRENCY EXPECTED EXCHANGE RATE RANGE OF POSSIBLE EXCHANGE RATES
British pound $ 1.50 $ 1.47 to $ 1.53
Japanese yen $ 0.0083 $.0079 to $.0087
Thai baht $ 0.024 $.020 to $.028

Holt has asked you to answer the following questions:
1. What type(s) of exposure (transaction, economic, or translation exposure) is Blades subject to? Why?
2. Using a spreadsheet, conduct a consolidated net cash flow assessment of Blades, Inc., and estimate the range of net inflows and outflows for Blades for the coming year. Assume that Blades enters into the agreement with Jogs, Ltd.
3. If Blades does not enter into the agreement with the British firm and continues to export to Thailand and import from Thailand and Japan, do you think the increased correlations between the Japanese yen and Thai baht will increase or reduce Blades’ transaction exposure?
4. Do you think Blades should import components from Japan to reduce its net transaction exposure in the long run? Why or why not?
5. Assuming Blades enters into an agreement with Jogs, Ltd., how will its overall transaction exposure be affected?
6. Given that Thai roller blade manufacturers located in Thailand have begun targeting the U.S. roller blade market, how do you think Blades’ U.S. sales were affected by the depreciation of the Thai baht? How do you think its exports to Thailand and Japan were affected by the depreciation?