. Introduction: Start with a leading sentence or sentences that bring(s) the reader in and also introduces them very generally to the topic of small RNAs and gene expression and the significance of this topic. At some point the introduction also needs to describe what was known about RNAi before your selected paper was published—what was the state of the field, and what were the most pressing questions at the time. You will need to first briefly describe RNAi to introduce the topic. The introduction may require one paragraph or two.

2. Main body of paper: This part should include several paragraphs that describe and highlight the aim(s) and most important results from the paper you choose to highlight, making sure to transition smoothly between paragraphs and to explain how the experiments were done and why the results were so important with respect to understanding the mechanism of RNAi. This part of this paper should provide a little more experimental detail. But be careful about the kind of details that you include.

3. Conclusion/summary: This part should contain one or two paragraphs in which you explain how your highlighted paper advanced the state of the field, and in which you spotlight the key questions that remained at that time. Looking ahead is always a good way to end this type of article.

Some additional points on things you should focus on:

Content—did you summarize the data accurately? Did you choose the most important
results to highlight?

Organization—it is structured in a logical manner?

Transitions—is each paragraph logically and smoothly connected to the preceding and/or following paragraph?

Grammar and spelling will affect your grade, but will have less weight than the scientific information you are conveying and the strength of your arguments.
i need four paragraphs because there are 4 figuresfirst paragraph is only for fig 1second for fig 2 and so onplease tell the writer to focus more on figures 2 3 and 4he has to explain in fig 3 what a superman phenotype isalso he has to put everything in his own wordsMy professor is not happy with this paper. Please explain all the
figures saying how they did it and why they did it. Explain the results
of the figures and say why they were important. Please put everything in
your own words and explain the figures at your best. Focus on figures
2,3, and 4.i don’t need an intro because i did one already  i need a good conclusion that some up the results and the importance of the entire study the authors did     he has to read the rubric    i have a F in the class now this is why i want something perfect   i need to pass this class in order to graduate   thank you for your help

Biology (and other Life Sciences)
writte at the appropriate level. Should be understood at the 8th grade level. Minimum 1 page, 12 pitch, double spaced, must include source, students may access www.citationmachine.net for assistance. Critical analysis technique should be utilized in writing paper, (i.e. does it make sense, does it include refs, do you agree or disagree with it? What did you learn? Etc.). Please follow the instruction with using this article in the link. DO the reading summery about it.

Oinn, T, M Addis, J Ferris, D Marvin, M Senger, M Greenwood, T Carver, K Glover, MR Pocock, A Wipat, and P Li. “Taverna: a Tool for the Composition and Enactment of Bioinformatics Workflows.” Bioinformatics (oxford, England). 20.17 (2004): 3045-54. Web. < http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/17/3045.full.pdf+html>