Assessment Task 2: Case Study
Students will complete a case study which discusses the provision and coordination of person-centred care linked to a real person they have cared for whilst on clinical placement.. This person at the centre of care should be select with the assistance of clinical staff and/or guidance of your clinical facilitator. For presentation instructions consult the ACU academic study guide (link)
Case study instructions
? Utilise the Clinical Reasoning Cycle (Levett-Jones, 2013) (a clinical decision making framework) to plan and evaluate person-centred care
? Considering the person’s situation, collect, process and present related health information
? Identify and prioritise at least three (3) nursing problems/issues based on the health assessment data that you have identified for the person at the centre of care.
? Establish goals for priority of nursing care as related to the nursing problem/issues identified
? Discuss the nursing care of the person; link it to assessment data and history.
? Evaluate your nursing care strategies to justify the nursing care provided
? Reflect on the person’s outcomes
Criterion High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Sequencing
5%
The content in the case
study matches the outline
presented in the
introductory paragraph.
Paragraphs are organised,
and there is a logical
progression of ideas so
that content flows from one
paragraph to the next. The
case study ends with a
rational conclusion.
The content in the case
study matches the outline
presented in the
introductory paragraph.
Paragraphs are organised
in a logical manner so that
content flows from one
paragraph to the next, and
the case study ends with a
rational conclusion.
The content in the case
study matches the outline
presented in the
introductory paragraph.
Most paragraphs are
organised in a logical
manner so that content
flows from one paragraph
to the next, and the case
study ends with a rational
conclusion.
The content in the case
study mostly matches the
outline presented in the
introductory paragraph.
Most paragraphs are
organised in a logical
manner, and the case
study ends with a rational
conclusion.
There is a no clear
introduction, or
rational conclusion.
Content within the
body and within
paragraphs is not
always logically
sequenced.
Content
50%
Comprehensively defines
and discusses the
provision of ethical, legal,
evidence-based, holistic
person centred care,
including the establishment
of realistic and relevant
goals.
Includes relevant
discussion on the
collection, processing and
presentation of
client/patient information
Clearly identifies and
prioritises nursing issues/
problems.
Defines and discusses the
provision of ethical, legal,
evidence-based, holistic
person centred care,
including the
establishment of realistic
and relevant goals
Includes discussion of the
collection, processing and
presentation of
client/patient
Clearly identifies and
prioritises nursing issues/
problems.
Describes the provision of
ethical, legal, evidencebased,
holistic person
centred care, including the
establishment of relevant
goals
Includes the collection,
processing and
presentation of
client/patient information
Identifies and prioritises
nursing issues/ problems.
Describes the provision of
ethical, legal, evidencebased,
holistic person
centred care, but does not
provide clear rationale for
choices or the
establishment of relevant
goals
Discusses the collection,
processing and
presentation of
client/patient information
and outlines nursing
issues/problems
No evidence of the
consideration or
provision of ethical,
legal, evidencebased,
holistic
person centred
care,
No issues/problems
identified.
Critical
thinking,
reasoning and
evaluation of
evidence
30%
There is evidence of both
depth and breadth of
reading. A considered
argument related to
nursing care and
issues/problems is
presented, and is
supported by adequate and
appropriate evidence.
There is evidence of both
depth and breadth of
reading. A considered
argument is presented,
and is supported by
adequate and appropriate
evidence.
There is evidence of both
depth and breadth of
reading. An argument is
presented, and is
supported by adequate
and appropriate evidence.
An argument is presented,
and is supported by
adequate and appropriate
evidence.
An argument is
presented, and is
supported by
minimal evidence.
Marker:
Comments:
Paragraph, structure / intelligibility 5%
The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is organised appropriately within the paragraph. Each paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link each paragraph to the next.
The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is organised appropriately within the paragraph. Each paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link most paragraphs to the next.
The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link most paragraphs to the next.
The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is mostly organised appropriately within the paragraph. Most paragraphs relates to a discrete idea. The paragraphs mostly link to one another.
There is evidence of paragraphs, however paragraph structure is disorganised, with no clear ideas, and no links. Sources & Referencing 10%
Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations has been used.
Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. A range of in-text citations has been used.
Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. There is limited use of a range of in-text citation formats.
Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions. There is no variation of in-text citation format.
Not all references are credible and/or relevant. Many inaccuracies with the APA referencing style.
Assessment Task 2: Case Study
Leave a Reply
Assessment Task 2 – Case Study
Assessment Task 2 – Case Study
Students are to choose one (1) of the case studies available on LEO and answer the associated questions. This assignment is to be presented in a question/answer format and not as an essay
(i.e. no introduction or conclusion). Each answer has a word limit and must be supported with appropriate references.
A Reference List must be provided at the end of the assignment
For more comprehensive information on this assessment task, including the case studies for this assessment task, please refer to the ‘My Assessments’ Folder in LEO .
Due date: 20th September 2015 at 2359 hrs
Weighting: 40%
Length and/or format: 1600 words
Purpose: This assessment task is designed to assess the knowledge and
skills related to nursing care of individuals experiencing acute
medical health alterations, and the best practice in managing this
exacerbation.
Specific focus will be on students researching the pathophysiology
of the relevant disease, the pharmacology of medications used to
manage the disease, and the evidence based nursing care required
to look after these patients, while supporting this information with
appropriate references.
Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
How to submit: Students will be required to submit this assignment through the
Turnitin dropbox
Return of assignment: Case study submissions will be returned to students 3 weeks after
the due date via the Turnitin dropbox
.Assessment criteria: This assessment task will be marked according to the marking
rubric over the page.
Assessment Task 2: Case Study – Marking Rubric (40%)
Criterion High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Linked to case study Linked to case study Linked to case study Linked to case study Not linked to case study
Q1 Provides comprehensive Provides a solid indication of Provides an identification of Provides minimal identification of Does not identify appropriate
Outline the causes, incidence and risk identification of causes, causes, incidences and risk causes, incidences and risk causes, incidences and risk factors causes, incidences and risk
factors of the selected disease and how it incidences and risk factors. factors. factors. Provides minimal understanding factors.
Provides comprehensive Provides a solid understanding of Provides an understanding of the of the diseases impact on patient Does not identify the impact on
can impact on the patient and their family
understanding of the disease the disease impact on patient and disease impact on patient and and family the patient and family
(400 words – 20%)
impact on patient and family family family
Q2 Provides a comprehensive look at Identifies five (5) signs and Identifies five (5) signs and Identifies five (5) common signs Does not identify five (5) signs and
List five (5) common signs and symptoms the identified five (5) common symptoms symptoms and symptoms symptoms
of the selected disease, and for each one signs and symptoms Provides a thorough link to Provides a solid link to Provides basic links to Does not link to appropriate
provide a link to the underlying
Provides a comprehensive link to pathophysiology pathophysiology pathophysiology. pathophysiology.
pathophysiology (350 words -15%)
pathophysiology
Q3 Two (2) classes of drugs Two (2) classes of drugs Two (2) classes of drugs One (1) class identified in Drugs identifies not appropriate
appropriately identified. appropriately identified. appropriately identified. appropriate
Describe two (2) common classes of drugs No identification of physiological
used for patients with the selected disease A comprehensive understanding A thorough understanding of the Some understanding of Minimal identification of effect on the body
including physiological effect of each class and explanation of the physiological effects on the body physiological effects on the body physiological effect on the body
on the body (350 words – 15%) physiological effects on the body
Q4 The care plan was articulate, The care plan was cohesive and The care plan was cohesive and A logical care plan was presented There is little/no cohesion to the
Identify and outline, in order of priority logical, balanced and convincing. logical. A sound attempt at logical.Some attempt at analysis but mostly descriptive. Some flow of the case study. Broad
A diverse range of perspectives analysis and critique from a range and critique was made. A number structure to ideas with generalisations are made.
the nursing care strategies you, as the
offered. All important aspects are of perspectives was also made. of key areas are covered satisfactory explanation of some Irrelevant content and
registered nurse, should use within the
covered demonstrating Most of the key areas are covered demonstrating a clear key areas provided. A basic unstructured points are made.
first 24 hours post admission for this
comprehensive knowledge of the demonstrating an advanced understanding of the important understanding was demonstrated. Key areas are not addressed.
patient (500 words – 40%)
key areas. understanding of the important issues. Minimal understanding is
issues. demonstrated.
NRSG353 Acute Care Nursing 2, Semester 2 2015 Page 17 of 19
Referencing An extensive range of relevant An extensive range of relevant Satisfactory use of literature with Satisfactory use of literature. Unsatisfactory use of literature.
literature utilised with literature utilised with appropriate interpretation & Some attempt to interpret & No attempt to interpret & apply
5% sophisticated interpretation and appropriate interpretation & application. apply the literature is evident. the literature is evident.
analysis. application. Mostly accurate referencing using Mostly accurate referencing using Not accurate referencing using
Accurate referencing using APA Accurate referencing using APA APA format. APA format. APA format.
format. format.
Presentation Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit More than 10% over word limit
5% Flawless presentation High standard of written Effective written communication Effective written communication Multiple errors in spelling and
communication with few errors of with few errors of spelling, and although a number or errors of grammar
spelling, and grammar grammar spelling and grammar Structure does not flow
topics are not linked appropriately
Comments
Final Grade /100 Marker:
TEXTS AND REFERENCES: ?Required text(s) ?
. Farrell, M., & Dempsey, J. (2014). Smeltzer and Bare’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing (3rd Australian and New Zealand ed.). Sydney: Wolters Kluwer Health/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
. ?McCance, K., & Huether, S. (2014). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier/Mosby.
. ?McKenna, L. & Lim, A. G. (2012). Pharmacology for nursing and midwifery. (1st Australian and New Zealand Edition). Broadway: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
. ?Tollefson, J. (2012). Clinical psychomotor skills: Assessment tools for nursing students (5th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning ?
Recommended references
Berman, A., Snyder, S., Kozier, B., Erb, G., Levett-Jones, T., Dwyer, T., et al. (2012). Kozier and Erb’s fundamentals of nursing. (2nd Australian ed.) French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.
Jarvis, C. Australian Adapting Editors Forbes, H., Watt, E,. (2012). Physical Examination & Health Assessment (Australian and New Zealand Edition.). Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier/ Saunders
Martini F., Nath J & Bartholomew E. (2012). Fundamentals of anatomy and physiology. (9th edn). San Francisco: Pearson.
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2006). National competency standards for the registered nurse. Retrieved from http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes- Guidelines-Statements/Codes- Guidelines.aspx
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2013). Codes and guidelines. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes- Guidelines-Statements/Codes- Guidelines.aspx
Perrin, R. (2012) Pocket guide to APA Style (4th ed.) Boston Massachusetts: Wadsworth/ Cengage Learning. (Highly recommended).
Tiziani, A. (2010). Havard’s nursing guide to drugs. (8th edn). Sydney: Mosby/Elsevier
Assessment Task 2 – Case Study
Assessment Task 2 – Case Study
Students are to choose one (1) of the case studies available on LEO and answer the associated questions. This assignment is to be presented in a question/answer format and not as an essay
(i.e. no introduction or conclusion). Each answer has a word limit and must be supported with appropriate references.
A Reference List must be provided at the end of the assignment
For more comprehensive information on this assessment task, including the case studies for this assessment task, please refer to the ‘My Assessments’ Folder in LEO .
Due date: 20th September 2015 at 2359 hrs
Weighting: 40%
Length and/or format: 1600 words
Purpose: This assessment task is designed to assess the knowledge and
skills related to nursing care of individuals experiencing acute
medical health alterations, and the best practice in managing this
exacerbation.
Specific focus will be on students researching the pathophysiology
of the relevant disease, the pharmacology of medications used to
manage the disease, and the evidence based nursing care required
to look after these patients, while supporting this information with
appropriate references.
Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
How to submit: Students will be required to submit this assignment through the
Turnitin dropbox
Return of assignment: Case study submissions will be returned to students 3 weeks after
the due date via the Turnitin dropbox
.Assessment criteria: This assessment task will be marked according to the marking
rubric over the page.
Assessment Task 2: Case Study – Marking Rubric (40%)
Criterion High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Unsatisfactory
Linked to case study Linked to case study Linked to case study Linked to case study Not linked to case study
Q1 Provides comprehensive Provides a solid indication of Provides an identification of Provides minimal identification of Does not identify appropriate
Outline the causes, incidence and risk identification of causes, causes, incidences and risk causes, incidences and risk causes, incidences and risk factors causes, incidences and risk
factors of the selected disease and how it incidences and risk factors. factors. factors. Provides minimal understanding factors.
Provides comprehensive Provides a solid understanding of Provides an understanding of the of the diseases impact on patient Does not identify the impact on
can impact on the patient and their family
understanding of the disease the disease impact on patient and disease impact on patient and and family the patient and family
(400 words – 20%)
impact on patient and family family family
Q2 Provides a comprehensive look at Identifies five (5) signs and Identifies five (5) signs and Identifies five (5) common signs Does not identify five (5) signs and
List five (5) common signs and symptoms the identified five (5) common symptoms symptoms and symptoms symptoms
of the selected disease, and for each one signs and symptoms Provides a thorough link to Provides a solid link to Provides basic links to Does not link to appropriate
provide a link to the underlying
Provides a comprehensive link to pathophysiology pathophysiology pathophysiology. pathophysiology.
pathophysiology (350 words -15%)
pathophysiology
Q3 Two (2) classes of drugs Two (2) classes of drugs Two (2) classes of drugs One (1) class identified in Drugs identifies not appropriate
appropriately identified. appropriately identified. appropriately identified. appropriate
Describe two (2) common classes of drugs No identification of physiological
used for patients with the selected disease A comprehensive understanding A thorough understanding of the Some understanding of Minimal identification of effect on the body
including physiological effect of each class and explanation of the physiological effects on the body physiological effects on the body physiological effect on the body
on the body (350 words – 15%) physiological effects on the body
Q4 The care plan was articulate, The care plan was cohesive and The care plan was cohesive and A logical care plan was presented There is little/no cohesion to the
Identify and outline, in order of priority logical, balanced and convincing. logical. A sound attempt at logical.Some attempt at analysis but mostly descriptive. Some flow of the case study. Broad
A diverse range of perspectives analysis and critique from a range and critique was made. A number structure to ideas with generalisations are made.
the nursing care strategies you, as the
offered. All important aspects are of perspectives was also made. of key areas are covered satisfactory explanation of some Irrelevant content and
registered nurse, should use within the
covered demonstrating Most of the key areas are covered demonstrating a clear key areas provided. A basic unstructured points are made.
first 24 hours post admission for this
comprehensive knowledge of the demonstrating an advanced understanding of the important understanding was demonstrated. Key areas are not addressed.
patient (500 words – 40%)
key areas. understanding of the important issues. Minimal understanding is
issues. demonstrated.
NRSG353 Acute Care Nursing 2, Semester 2 2015 Page 17 of 19
Referencing An extensive range of relevant An extensive range of relevant Satisfactory use of literature with Satisfactory use of literature. Unsatisfactory use of literature.
literature utilised with literature utilised with appropriate interpretation & Some attempt to interpret & No attempt to interpret & apply
5% sophisticated interpretation and appropriate interpretation & application. apply the literature is evident. the literature is evident.
analysis. application. Mostly accurate referencing using Mostly accurate referencing using Not accurate referencing using
Accurate referencing using APA Accurate referencing using APA APA format. APA format. APA format.
format. format.
Presentation Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit Within 10% of word limit More than 10% over word limit
5% Flawless presentation High standard of written Effective written communication Effective written communication Multiple errors in spelling and
communication with few errors of with few errors of spelling, and although a number or errors of grammar
spelling, and grammar grammar spelling and grammar Structure does not flow
topics are not linked appropriately
Comments
Final Grade /100 Marker:
TEXTS AND REFERENCES: ?Required text(s) ?
. Farrell, M., & Dempsey, J. (2014). Smeltzer and Bare’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing (3rd Australian and New Zealand ed.). Sydney: Wolters Kluwer Health/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
. ?McCance, K., & Huether, S. (2014). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier/Mosby.
. ?McKenna, L. & Lim, A. G. (2012). Pharmacology for nursing and midwifery. (1st Australian and New Zealand Edition). Broadway: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
. ?Tollefson, J. (2012). Clinical psychomotor skills: Assessment tools for nursing students (5th ed.). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning ?
Recommended references
Berman, A., Snyder, S., Kozier, B., Erb, G., Levett-Jones, T., Dwyer, T., et al. (2012). Kozier and Erb’s fundamentals of nursing. (2nd Australian ed.) French’s Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.
Jarvis, C. Australian Adapting Editors Forbes, H., Watt, E,. (2012). Physical Examination & Health Assessment (Australian and New Zealand Edition.). Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier/ Saunders
Martini F., Nath J & Bartholomew E. (2012). Fundamentals of anatomy and physiology. (9th edn). San Francisco: Pearson.
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2006). National competency standards for the registered nurse. Retrieved from http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes- Guidelines-Statements/Codes- Guidelines.aspx
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2013). Codes and guidelines. Retrieved from
http://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes- Guidelines-Statements/Codes- Guidelines.aspx
Perrin, R. (2012) Pocket guide to APA Style (4th ed.) Boston Massachusetts: Wadsworth/ Cengage Learning. (Highly recommended).
Tiziani, A. (2010). Havard’s nursing guide to drugs. (8th edn). Sydney: Mosby/Elsevier