Annotated Bibliography
Order Description
Max Points: 150

Details:
Synthesis is the process of creating a new idea by analyzing multiple disparate concepts or notions to discern the common thematic or connecting principles among them. Synthesis of research is not a single innate skill. Rather, it is a process learned through time and practice. In this assignment, you will engage in the first parts of the synthesis process: annotating and outlining.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Read: Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489-505.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2012-19403-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
• Read: van Eeden, R., Cilliers, F., & van Deventer, V. (2008). Leadership styles and associated personality traits: Support for the conceptualisation of transactional and transformational leadership. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 253-267.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2009-01045-001&site=eds-live&scope=site
• Read: Odom, S. F., Boyd, B. L., & Williams, J. (2012). Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(1), 49-63.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=88906216&site=eds-live&scope=site
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Provide an annotated bibliography (750-1,000 words total) of the articles listed above. Including the following for each article:
1. The article citation and persistent link. These are provided above for you to paste into the assignment and are not included in the total word count.
2. A written summary of the key concept(s) of the article. Why was the study done? What was the population studied? What did the researcher(s) conclude? What other information about this study do you believe is unique or important to recall? Are there specific statements made by the author that you wish to retain?
Construct an outline for a paper that will explain and synthesize the articles you read for this assignment. The paper will require identification of themes common to the articles as well as a statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity You will be writing the paper in the next assignment.

Rubic for Assignment
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
73.00% 3
Satisfactory
82.00% 4
Good
91.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
90.0 %Content
60.0 % Annotated Bibliography An annotated bibliography is either missing or not evident to the reader. An annotated bibliography is present, but inaccurate or incomplete. An annotated bibliography is presented, but the elements are addressed in a cursory manner. An annotated bibliography is presented and includes all necessary elements. An annotated bibliography is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements.
30.0 % Outline of Synthesis Paper An outline of the synthesis paper is not presented. An outline of the synthesis paper is presented. However, the outline is unorganized and illogical in its construction. An outline of the synthesis paper is presented. The outline is vague, but functional. An outline of the synthesis paper is presented. It is reasonably organized and includes a moderate amount of detail. An outline of the synthesis paper is thoroughly presented. It is well organized and thoughtful, and it includes a fully appropriate level of detail.
10.0 %Format
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 % APA Format Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage

Annotated Bibliography

Sources need to be cited in alphabetical order:

“Junk Food Ads and Kids” by Common Sense Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ahMQwxN9Js
Why McDonald’s fries taste so good

Schlosser, Eric. Why McDonald’s Fries Taste so Good (2001): 50-56. Web. 30 Sept. 2015.

“Food Pyramid” http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/sites/default/files/archived_projects/FGPPamphlet.pdf

Pollan, Michael. “Eat Food: Food Defined.” In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. New York: Penguin, 2008. 147-61. Print.

Requirements:
The elements we discussed to consider improving include: Make summary details more focused/succinct. Begin with a clear summary statement that sets up the paragraph to have a clear and specific subject and purpose. Ie; “In this video, Common Sense Media presents a set of guidelines for parents… The video makes its points in this specific way: [fill in short details.] Transition to evaluation of source material. You can use the source material itself as evidence, such as the tone, organization, professional feel, etc. You can use background info on the author too. Consider the credentials and experience of the creator of this text/video. Do they set it up to be biased? Objective? Some/something you should listen to? Should you be wary of an agenda? Do they seem to have the public interest in mind, or do they seem to be focused on a limited group? Or are they mainly talking to hear themselves? Synthesize your interpretation of the sources. Do you notice any connections between the sources? Do they confirm each other? Contradict each other? Do they remind you of each other in some noteworthy way? Has a “relationship” formed in your mind between this source and the other sources in your bibliography?

The sources are to be cited and annotated

Annotated Bibliography

Sources need to be cited in alphabetical order:

“Junk Food Ads and Kids” by Common Sense Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ahMQwxN9Js
Why McDonald’s fries taste so good

Schlosser, Eric. Why McDonald’s Fries Taste so Good (2001): 50-56. Web. 30 Sept. 2015.

“Food Pyramid” http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/sites/default/files/archived_projects/FGPPamphlet.pdf

Pollan, Michael. “Eat Food: Food Defined.” In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. New York: Penguin, 2008. 147-61. Print.

Requirements:
The elements we discussed to consider improving include: Make summary details more focused/succinct. Begin with a clear summary statement that sets up the paragraph to have a clear and specific subject and purpose. Ie; “In this video, Common Sense Media presents a set of guidelines for parents… The video makes its points in this specific way: [fill in short details.] Transition to evaluation of source material. You can use the source material itself as evidence, such as the tone, organization, professional feel, etc. You can use background info on the author too. Consider the credentials and experience of the creator of this text/video. Do they set it up to be biased? Objective? Some/something you should listen to? Should you be wary of an agenda? Do they seem to have the public interest in mind, or do they seem to be focused on a limited group? Or are they mainly talking to hear themselves? Synthesize your interpretation of the sources. Do you notice any connections between the sources? Do they confirm each other? Contradict each other? Do they remind you of each other in some noteworthy way? Has a “relationship” formed in your mind between this source and the other sources in your bibliography?

The sources are to be cited and annotated