Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Alcohol

Alcohol
Paper instructions:

The Situation: All of the work we have completed so far in WRD 104 has prepared you to write an argumentative research paper. Now is the opportunity for you to draw on the wide range of skills you have developed reach out to a broad audience of readers—including your instructor, your classmates, others who will see the Digication pages—to make an argument on an issue of your choice.
The Task: The Argumentative Research Paper requires you to formulate a specific original argument in relation to an issue of your choice. To this end, you must frame some “conversation” for your audience, then demonstrate how your thesis enters into that conversation. Your argument must be clear central to your paper, you must develop it throughout the paper. Also, you must continually situate your own claims in relation to others? writing, using MLA in-text citations an MLA Works Cited page. The goal of your paper is to bring your audience into a specific issue then engage them with your own, original argument.
The Purpose: Writing this paper gives you the chance to draw on the range of skills we have been developing all quarter. It is your opportunity to demonstrate that you can use these skills to produce a strong piece of academic research. Also, it will serve as excellent practice for future work in your college career, as you will likely be expected to write research papers in other classes.
Sources, Documentation, Format: These are some of the specific parameters for the final text.
? Include a minimum of eight total sources, of which at least six must be sources you?ve found on your own.
You can use sources from the syllabus, but these will be used in addition to the six you find on your own. Although journalistic sources (from newspapers magazines) may be needed for your topic, some of your sources should be academic, which means they will come from scholarly journals or books. Also, no open website sources (including Wikipedia) will be accepted. If you feel your particular topic requires you to use open websites (not databases), talk to me about it to get my approval.
? You must cite each of your sources at least once in the body of your paper.
? Include MLA in-text documentation a complete MLA Works Cited page.
Evaluation Criteria: A successful Argumentative Research Paper will do the following:
? Contain a clear thesis that contributes to a “conversation”
? Frame overview that “conversation” for the reader
? Develop the thesis in a focused, well-organized, logical manner
? Quote, paraphrase, summarize source texts effectively without plagiarism
? Analyze others? arguments critically
? Be free of distracting grammatical mechanical errors
? Contain correct use of MLA documentation style, including in-text citations a works

TO ORDER FOR THIS QUESTION OR A SIMILAR ONE, CLICK THE ORDER NOW BUTTON AND ON THE ORDER FORM, FILL ALL THE REQUIRED DETAILS THEN TRACE THE DISCOUNT CODE,
TYPE IT ON THE DISCOUNT BOX AND CLICK ON ‘USE CODE’ TO EFFECT YOUR DISCOUNT. THANK YOU

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Alcohol

Alcohol

Conventional drug: Acamprosate
Experimental drug: Topiramate
This essay is about alcohol dependence which can be treated by acamprosate (a conventional drug). There is a experimental drug (Topiramate ) which is not approved yet to be used for the same condition. So, this essay is going to discuss this topic and the general instructions are below:

Abstract
In the abstract, half A4-page max (200-400 words), address:
–    which aspect of the pathology is targeted by experimental drug
–    mechanism of action and effects at cell level to organism level
–    reported efficacies, side effects, etc
–    your view of current status, critical evaluation of reports, shortcomings, potential

Some points should be included in this report:

–    the condition, succinctly summarised (setting the scene for the drug)
–    mechanism of action, from molecular to organism level, if known
–    clinical studies, efficacies
–    clinical studies, side-effects
–    Substance:  have the required issues been addressed adequately, appropriately?
–    Substance:  are there errors in fact? (as far as you can tell)
–    Argument:  does the report represent a coherent, flowing story?
–    View:  does the author present their own view (based on literature), rather than merely stringing together summaries from the literature?  (irrespective whether you agree or not)
–    Argument:  can you identify glaring gaps or flaws in the argument?
–    Summary:  does the summary provide a stand-alone representation, summarising the essence of the argument?

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Alcohol

Alcohol

Conventional drug: Acamprosate
Experimental drug: Topiramate
This essay is about alcohol dependence which can be treated by acamprosate (a conventional drug). There is a experimental drug (Topiramate ) which is not approved yet to be used for the same condition. So, this essay is going to discuss this topic and the general instructions are below:

Abstract
In the abstract, half A4-page max (200-400 words), address:
–    which aspect of the pathology is targeted by experimental drug
–    mechanism of action and effects at cell level to organism level
–    reported efficacies, side effects, etc
–    your view of current status, critical evaluation of reports, shortcomings, potential

Some points should be included in this report:

–    the condition, succinctly summarised (setting the scene for the drug)
–    mechanism of action, from molecular to organism level, if known
–    clinical studies, efficacies
–    clinical studies, side-effects
–    Substance:  have the required issues been addressed adequately, appropriately?
–    Substance:  are there errors in fact? (as far as you can tell)
–    Argument:  does the report represent a coherent, flowing story?
–    View:  does the author present their own view (based on literature), rather than merely stringing together summaries from the literature?  (irrespective whether you agree or not)
–    Argument:  can you identify glaring gaps or flaws in the argument?
–    Summary:  does the summary provide a stand-alone representation, summarising the essence of the argument?

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes