Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Administrative Law

Administrative Law

Order Description

Short Essay #1

? Review the Federalist Papers 10 and 51 by James Madison and write an essay on how you
think the modern administrative bureaucracy fulfills or contradicts the kind of
constitutional republic Madison is arguing for in those papers.

Short Essay #2

?Write an
essay in which you analyze and compare the authority of government agencies to
take or to refrain from discretionary action as described in Heckler v.
Chaney and Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
In one case, the Court upheld the discretionary decision of an agency not to
act, and in the other it upheld the agency’s discretionary decision to take
action. In both cases, considerable constitutional rights were at stake, life,
and liberty. Assuming that courts will not generally intervene in such actions,
what rules should agencies abide by to make sure they are not exercising their
discretion in a dictatorial manner?
Heckler
v. Chaney link

(Click the link “Opinion” in the box labeled Case Basics.)
Reno
v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee link

(Click the link “Opinion” in the box labeled Case Basics.)

Write each short essay as a 300-450 word essay in
Microsoft Word format.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Administrative Law

Administrative Law

Order Description

Short Essay #1

? Review the Federalist Papers 10 and 51 by James Madison and write an essay on how you
think the modern administrative bureaucracy fulfills or contradicts the kind of
constitutional republic Madison is arguing for in those papers.

Short Essay #2

?Write an
essay in which you analyze and compare the authority of government agencies to
take or to refrain from discretionary action as described in Heckler v.
Chaney and Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
In one case, the Court upheld the discretionary decision of an agency not to
act, and in the other it upheld the agency’s discretionary decision to take
action. In both cases, considerable constitutional rights were at stake, life,
and liberty. Assuming that courts will not generally intervene in such actions,
what rules should agencies abide by to make sure they are not exercising their
discretion in a dictatorial manner?
Heckler
v. Chaney link

(Click the link “Opinion” in the box labeled Case Basics.)
Reno
v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee link

(Click the link “Opinion” in the box labeled Case Basics.)

Write each short essay as a 300-450 word essay in
Microsoft Word format.

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes