icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Literature review

Literature review – you should not just report past works or technologies, you need to critically review them, describe very clearly how from what you learnt led you to your own project design
Discussions – you need to be critical in your discussion
Conclusions (summary of findings) + recommendations / future works
References – IEEE STYLE!!!
The whole work, the critical review should be on the smart homenot the Internet of things as this I already have.
The techniques used, the connection and communication techniques and review the boards used against the boards, which I will be using which are:
1) A Teensy board and an Ada fruit CC3000 board, advantage is that teensy has got a powerful 32 bit ARM processor. Disadvantage an external Wifi therefore the circuit will be a bit
scattered and not very ideal for Smart home applications at it requires very small devices.
Adafruit CC3000 WiFi Breakout with Onboard Ceramic Antenna
http://uk.farnell.com/adafruit-industries/1625/teensy-3-1-header-usb-dev-kit-41×4352/dp/2430007?Ntt=teensy

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Literature review

Literature review

Order Description
Task 1: Literature review
on
“INCLUDING THE MIGRANT STUDENTS IN SECONDARY COLLEGES IN AUSTRALIA”-Word limit 2000 words

How to include the migrant students in the class: The strategies a teacher should adapt to include the migrant students(whose first language is not English)in the class.

Initial planning
First u need to write a brief plan as how u will go about this task 100 -200 words (later u can include this part in the introduction of the actual literature review.)in the initial plan u should also include some literature u will be researching couple of references will do

The criteria for the literature review are as follows:
1.Identify the inclusive education practices in Australia- for this u need to describe literature that tells you how is the practice of personalizing and including migrant students in our class(Australian school context)

2.Synthesized comparison of the process of personalized learning – this means drawing conclusions from what you find, describe the material that you find and their conclusions in a way that demonstrates your understanding

3.Comprehensive analysis of the literature on the different strategies, techniques, measures a teacher should follow to include the migrant student(s).

4.Comparison of the methodologies used in the literature

5.Critical analysis: identify bias, or gaps or methodological faults in the research

6.Critical reflection: here you reflect on your experience undertaking the study,what did we learn,how this will impact or inform your practice as an educator

7.Recommendations for the future research
Word limit 2000 words
Harvard referencing- intext and in bibiliography

THE TITLE OF THE BOOK IS

“TEACHING IN INCLUSIVE SCHOOL COMMUNITIES”

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes