Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

  • time icon24/7 online - support@tutoringspots.com
  • phone icon1-316-444-1378 or 44-141-628-6690
  • login iconLogin

Philosophy

From the earliest years of Western philosophy there has been a tension between relativism and objectivism. In its formative years, this debate culminates in the confrontation of Socrates with his contemporaries as presented by Plato in his dialogues. While this debate may not be an explicit theme in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, or Mill’s Utilitarianism, it is nonetheless implicit in each of these three philosophers’ moral theories. Indeed, each of these theories recognizes some objective ground, or universal standard of moral judgment, which secures it against relativism. Discuss this in some detail.

please submit an outline of how are you going to construct the essay?
What’s the thesis of the paper?
Thanks.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Philosophy

Philosophy
Taylor claims that universal moral commitments—Universalism, the commitment to complete equality of rights leads to a commitment, a need, to treat people differently. He says…. Why does he think this? How can his view here seem, in part, to arise from the views of Kant, Mill and Rawls? Still Taylor does not think that any old difference between people can lead to the right to be treated differently. Why does he think this? What are the constraints, according to Taylor, on the sorts of differences that must be respected? How is Taylor’s view like, or different than, Rorty’s that “we must be ethnocentric”? As illustrations of points made in your essay, feel free to appeal to cases: marriage by capture, the king’s horseman,

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Philosophy

Philosophy
Taylor claims that universal moral commitments—Universalism, the commitment to complete equality of rights leads to a commitment, a need, to treat people differently. He says…. Why does he think this? How can his view here seem, in part, to arise from the views of Kant, Mill and Rawls? Still Taylor does not think that any old difference between people can lead to the right to be treated differently. Why does he think this? What are the constraints, according to Taylor, on the sorts of differences that must be respected? How is Taylor’s view like, or different than, Rorty’s that “we must be ethnocentric”? As illustrations of points made in your essay, feel free to appeal to cases: marriage by capture, the king’s horseman,

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes